FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Exhibit III-1 Five Forces Affecting Industry Structure ENTRY BARRIERS Economies of scale Proprietary product differences Brand identity Switching costs Capital requirements Access to distribution Absolute cost advantages Proprietary learning curve Access to necessary inputs Proprietary low-cost product design Government policy and international treaties Expected retaliation RIVALRY DETERMINANTS Industry Growth Fixed (or storage) costs/value-added Intermittent overcapacity
Premium Barriers to entry Brand Substitute good
significant factors which lead to organisational success is understanding competition and one way of evaluating this‚ is through industry analysis. As explained by Porter “to sustain long-term profitability you must respond
Premium Strategic management Strategic management Management
methodology called the Porter’s Five Forces Analysis. In his book Competitive Strategy‚ Harvard professor Michael Porter describes five forces affecting the profitability of companies. These are the five forces he noted: 1. Intensity of rivalry amongst existing competitors 2. Threat of entry by new competitors 3. Pressure from substitute products 4. Bargaining power of buyers (customers) 5. Bargaining power of suppliers These five forces‚ taken together‚ give us insight
Premium Barriers to entry Strategic management Cost
A Five Forces Analysis of Allscripts‚ An Electronic Health Records (EHR) technology company Robert A. Brinker GBA 530 – Management Information Systems Professor Billie Whitfield February 6‚ 2012 The purpose of this paper is to identify competitive forces at work based on Michael Porter’s Five Competitive Forces from his Competitive Analysis Model (McNurlin‚ 2009) and provide recommendations to Allscripts‚ an electronic health records (EHR) technology company
Premium Electronic health record Health care Medicine
familiar and conduct a Porter’s Five Forces analysis. 2. What are the key success factors of the organisation identified? Businesses worldwide experience some form of competition whilst operating in their respective industry. In the macro-environment there are factors that exist that can determine whether or not an organization gains competitive advantage or becomes viable. Michael Porter developed a Five Forces model to aid in analyzing the industry. These Five forces are:- • Competitive
Free Milk Dairy Dairy farming
Using Porter’s Five Force analysis to assess this industry‚ one notices that first of all the internal rivalry would be intense between us and Empire Plastics and both companies (and others) would try to severely underprice the other’s offer. There would be considerable buyer power since the target customers would be giant supermarket chains and there is little customer diversity‚ with a very few customers dictating who they buy from and even what price they pay. In addition there would be a lot
Premium Barriers to entry Marketing Investment
Running head: PORTER’S STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK Porter Five Forces Analysis Managerial Economics – MBA 500 Instructor: Professor Franklin By: LaTonya Perryman Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration Concordia University Wisconsin November 1‚ 2011 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………3 Michael Porter’s Strategic Framework…...……………..……………………..………3 The Long-run Efficiency Implications of an Oligopoly……………………………
Premium Economics Monopoly Perfect competition
External Analysis According to Porter (1985): "The essence of formulating competitive strategy is relating a company to its environment" (p. 3) in relation to the industry or industries in which it competes. This leads companies to choose one of three generic strategies – low cost‚ differentiation or focus – which will help them to form competitive‚ profitable positions within the industry. To understand the low-cost strategies that both SBUs adopted‚ a formal PEST and five forces analysis of the
Premium Photovoltaics Renewable energy Wind power
Team #5 MGMT449 02/18/2012 Hewlett-Packard’s Five Competitive Forces "To provide products‚ services and solutions of the highest quality and deliver more value to our customers that earns their respect and loyalty. HP’s Mission Statement” Hewlett-Packard or HP as commonly known is a leading global provider of products‚ technologies‚ software‚ solutions‚ and services to individual consumers‚ small-and-medium-sized business and large enterprises‚ including customers in the government‚ health
Premium Hewlett-Packard Personal computer Competition
external interests such as satisfaction and customers’ perception of service quality. Based on this traditional definition of service quality‚ Parasuraman‚ Zeithaml‚ and Berry (1985) developed the "Gap Model" of perceived service quality. This model has five gaps: Gap 1. Consumer expectation - Management perception gap Gap 2. Management perception - Service quality specification gap Gap 3. Service quality specifications - Service delivery gap Gap 4. Service delivery - External communication gap Gap
Premium Management Customer service Quality assurance