Memorandum To: From: Date: 08/31/2012 Re: Laws of Evidence Assignment #2 Statement of Assignment You have asked me to analyze and determine whether the evidence that prosecution would like to introduce at trial can be admitted based on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Pursuant to your request‚ this memo includes my analysis‚ reasoning‚ and conclusions regarding the admissibility of such evidence. Statement of Facts The defendant was prosecuted for the murder of his wife. The victim’s body
Premium Evidence law Critical thinking Murder
Admiralty Outline Fall 2003 Overview Admiralty is federal law‚ originating in Article III‚ § 2 of Constitution. i. First Congress included Cases of Admiralty/Maritime in Judiciary Act. ii. Supremacy Clause. b. If say that case is admiralty/maritime case‚ governed by admiralty law‚ is to say that substantive admiralty law applies. i. Differences: statute of limitations‚ comparative laws for recovery‚ etc. a. Main: trial by judge. From very beginning‚ admiralty cases are w/o juries
Premium Law of the sea Common law
without a trace by butch the park ranger. 2. What types of evidence did the forensic scientists encounter in the game? The types of evidence that the forensic scientists encountered was soil‚ fingerprints‚ and a shoe prints 3. Choose one of the locations in the game. Discuss what evidence was found at the location and what challenges the location and evidence might present in the collection of evidence? At the second area of the game the evidence that was found there was shoes print but this time two
Free Forensic evidence Fingerprint Evidence
Audit Evidence This chapter deals with the types of evidence decisions auditors make‚ the evidence available to auditors‚ and the use of that evidence in performing audits. NATURE OF EVIDENCE • Evidence is any information used by the auditor to determine whether the information being audited is stated in accordance with the established criteria. • Evidence includes information that is highly persuasive‚ such as the auditor ’s count of marketable securities‚ and less persuasive information
Premium Audit Auditing Balance sheet
Based on the information given I see this as an act of terrorism because of where the explosion went off. Any explosion on a military base cannot be defined as a terrorist attack versus just an attack. In this case attacking the community center means you are looking at killing not just members of the U.S. military but also the families that reside there. Not knowing the history of the militants in Flooa and neither how they classify themselves you would not want to immediately put the stamp of
Premium Terrorism Attack Attack!
Please explain your expectations from studying in Türkiye and express your future plans University is not about growing up or living by your own‚ it’s about to expand your horizons and be prepared for your future. I’m about to step into this life full of new challenges and experiences. The great campus‚ various clubs and interesting activities these are what I expect from studying in Turkey. Living in dormitory will prepare me for independent “adult” life. When I was looking through university
Premium Higher education Academic degree Istanbul
secondary evidence was tendered and admitted. An objection was taken to its admission; Held: That such evidence was properly admitted and that the provision in the relevant statute “that no statement made by any person in answer to any question put by the Commission shall‚ except in cases of indictment for perjury committed in such answers‚ be admissible in evidence in any proceedings‚ civil or criminal” was not applicable‚ and did not prevent the admissibility of such evidence. In the
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Law
Southside High School Facilitator: Henrietta Jones 2.05 Can This Evidence Be Individualized? Evidence 1: A piece of torn clothing was found at a crime scene. A torn t-shirt was found in one of the suspect’s car. 1. Can the torn clothing from the crime scene be individualized to the t-shirt found in the car? Why or why not? Yes. Because it could be individual evidence small glass fragments large glass fragment Evidence 2: Small pieces of glass were found in a suspect’s shirt pocket
Premium Match Piece Newspaper
1. Hearsay evidence rule in Malaysia The general hearsay rule is that a statement made by a person not called as a witness is inadmissible to prove the truth of the facts stated and extends to oral evidence as to statements in documents.1 Where oral evidence is relied on‚ it must be direct in all cases.2 Section 603 has thus codified the rule against hearsay evidence. “Hearsay” does not mean that no witness can be allowed to depose anything which he has heard said by anyone else.4 It is secondary
Premium Evidence law Common law
According to the Evidence Act Cap 6‚ evidence denotes the means by which any alleged matter or facts the truth of which is submitted to investigations‚ approved or disapproved‚ admissions‚ presumption of law and observations by courts in the judicial capacity as per section 2[1]d of the act. Rules of evidence refer to the procedure of admitting relevant facts by courts of law and in general they are referred to as Relevancy and Admissibility of Evidence According to section 4‚ it may be given from
Premium FACT Appeal Evidence law