oppressively or unfairly towards them. In our case‚ Bryan is minority-shareholder; Don and his board faction are majority-shareholder. To protect Bryan’s interests and rights‚ there are two possible remedies can be advised to Bryan: s 232‚ s461 (1) (e)‚ (f) and (g). S 232 provides a remedy where the affairs of a company are conducted in a manner that is contrary to the interests of the member as a whole‚ oppressive‚ unfairly discriminatory or unfairly prejudicial.1 The court may order the winding up
Premium Corporation Stock Management
You Decide Page 1 FI561 – Mergers & Acquisitions – Week 3 Scenario Summary This is based on Merck’s Acquisition of Medco: Case 5.1‚ pp. 124-125. Your Role/Assignment You are the Chairman and CEO of Merck. Make a recommendation to the Board of Directors of Merck & Co. regarding this acquisition based on the recommendations of the three associates and your own analysis. You are the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Merck & Company‚ and you will make the final “yes” or “no” recommendation
Premium Management occupations Corporate governance Chief executive officer
YOU DECIDE: INTERNATIONAL CASE STUDY 1 You Decide: International Case Study Andree Carmelita Pierre DeVry University Keller Graduate School of Management YOU DECIDE: INTERNATIONAL CASE STUDY 2 Abstract Mary Wright is a human resources consultant for a telecommunications’ company in Miami‚ Florida‚ whose company has recently decided to expand its operations in the Arab Emirates‚ in Dubai. Mary’s extensive professional background along with her dedication
Premium United Arab Emirates
Margie Wilson‚ a 95 year old woman and patient at Golden Oaks Rehabilitation Center located on the grounds of Marion General Hospital‚ is dealing with some difficult times after losing her son‚ Williams‚ this past week. Within the past five years‚ she has also had to deal with the passing of her husband of 68 years‚ Earl‚ and another son who died in a motor vehicle accident‚ Jacob. Margie is having a very difficult time taking this all in and is not feeling alone. She has come to the conclusion
Premium Ethics Morality
We are ecstatic about your decision to get a website. That is a great business decision and perhaps one of the best investments that you can make towards growing your business. It’s my pleasure to work with you! The website will help you in many ways. One primary reason is that it will help you reach unlimited customers around the world. Well‚ let me tell you a little about our company – The Website Specialist. For years‚ we have been successful in helping thousands small businesses like yourself
Premium Customer relationship management Customer service Customer
1. In response to the request on potential liability to the sexual harassment case brought by Virginia Pollard‚ the company is vicariously liable for the conduct of its employees even though there is a sexual harassment policy in place. Virginia had become a victim of a hostile work environment supported by a supervisor with immediate authority over the employee. Pollard was working in a very stressful environment in which she (being the only female) was a minority being subjected to inappropriate
Premium Sexual harassment Harassment Abuse
federal tax income? Applicable Law & Analysis: http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/selfemployed/index.html Conclusion: The $300‚000 will be treated as self- employed income. Generally you are self-employed if you carry on a trade or business as a sole proprietor‚ independent contractor‚ or if you are a member of a partnership. Self-employed individuals are required to file an annual return‚ and pay estimated tax quarterly. Issue b) How is the $25‚000 treated for purposes of federal
Premium Depreciation Taxation Income tax
Memorandum To: Earl Levith From: Date: 6/14/14 Re: Choices and Consequences Transcript I have been informed of a heart that has become available. There are three patients awaiting a heart transplant. Each patient has their own unique situation‚ but in order to make an ethical decision that benefits the greater number of people‚ I must consider each person’s health history‚ life expectancy after the transplant‚ and the effect on their families. “If we make decisions on principles of utility
Premium Ethics Utilitarianism Immanuel Kant
understand you. A fallacy has been committed. One has proven to be a good logician. One ought to use inductive reasoning. The syllogism is sound. Instructor Explanation: Tutorial Points Received: 4 of 4 Comments: Question 2. Question : A car salesman says this‚ in order to get you to buy a new car from him: "Buddy! You gotta buy this car. You’ve seen the commercials where Governor Ahnold is driving this car‚ haven’t you? You want to
Free Logic Inductive reasoning Reasoning
1-A: How is the $300‚000 treated for purposes of Federal tax income? The tax issue here is that John Smith wants to know how the $300‚000 he earned through his client fee is taxed. The $300‚000 is taxed as ordinary income and is taxed in the year received. John Smith worked on the case for two years but he did not earn the $300‚000 until this year so he will include it in this year’s taxable income. Therefore John Smith needs to include the entire $300‚000 as ordinary income on his Federal
Premium