advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine of precedent and how judges may make new law. Include 1 case where judges have made new law. The doctrine of precedent is an important feature of judge-made law (common law). This doctrine means that similar disputes should be decided by reference to the same legal principles‚ and that lower courts are bound to follow the decisions of higher courts within the same court hierarchy. There are both advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine of precedent and the
Premium Law Common law Precedent
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine of precedent. The doctrine of precedent means that judges refer back to previous decisions to help them decide similar cases where the law and facts are alike. Top of Form Bottom of Form Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine of precedent. Judicial precedent concerns itself with the influence and value of past decisions of case law and prior legal experience. The doctrine of precedent means that judges refer back to previous
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
[pic] [pic] Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 BID AND PREPARATIONS 3 COSTS 3 MARKETING 3 PARTICIPATING TEAMS 3 INTRODUCTION The 2010 Winter Olympics‚ officially the XXI Olympic Winter Games or the 21st Winter Olympics‚ was a major international multi-sport event held on February 12–28‚ 2010‚ in Vancouver‚ British Columbia‚ Canada‚ with some events held in the resort town of Whistler‚ Richmond‚ West
Premium 2010 Winter Olympics Olympic Games Winter Olympic Games
Reasoning and Institutions Question 1: “in practice the doctrine of precedent does not constrain judicial decision-making; activist judges can always creatively interpret previous cases to reach the outcome they desire.” Discuss. Answer: In considering whether the doctrine of precedent constrain activist judges like Lord Denning in making their decision‚ we should first examine the English legal system and how judicial precedents operates. The lowest court of law in England and Wales‚ which
Premium Stare decisis Common law Precedent
PROJECT: Chicken Point Cabin LOCATON: Chicken Point‚ Idaho‚ U.S.A. OWNER: Unknown ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig Allen Architects CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Monte Clark Engineering CONTRACTOR: Doric Creager‚ MC Company‚ Spokane FUNCION: Residential Architecture PROJECT COMPLETION: 2002 The Chicken Point Cabin is Located in the North Western area of the states‚ Idaho. In Idaho the climates are similar to its neighbor state Washington where it is much cloudy and precipitates almost
Premium Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Frank Lloyd Wright
PRECEDENT: Stare Decisis - Stand by the Decision The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis‚ this means that like cases should be treated alike. Once a point of law has been decided in a particular case‚ that law must be applied in all future cases containing the same material facts. For example in the case “Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)‚ The House of Lords held that the manufacturer owed the duty of care to the ultimate consumer of the product. This set a binding
Premium Stare decisis Appeal Common law
THE DOCTRINE OF BINDING PRECEDENT INTRODUCTION The doctrine of binding precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis i.e.‚ to stand by the decided. In practice‚ this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the
Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent
Judicial Precedent means the process whereby judges follow the decisions made by previous judges in similar cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. In deciding a case‚ there will be basic tasks‚ establishing what the facts are‚ meaning what actually happened‚ as well as how the law applies to those facts. The idea of judicial precedent is that once a decision has been made in a set of particular facts‚ similar facts in later cases should be treated in the same way. The rules concerning
Premium Stare decisis Common law Precedent
Question(A) JUDICIAL PRECEDENT Judicial Precedent is a decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. In Judicial Precedent the decision made in superiors are binding on subsequent cases in lower courts on the same or similar facts. The doctrine of judicial Precedent did not become fully established until the second half of the nineteenth century. In the Common law Courts in the United Kingdom the procedure was to apply the theory of the common law‚ which as simply
Premium Common law Supreme court Court
of judicial precedent‚ which predominant value is irrefutable. However‚ it is a disputable question‚ whether the bias of the doctrine on the maintenance of the judicial authority is accurate and contemporary. The nature of precedent can be described by putting the words of Lord Denning in London tramways case: Rule of precedent is not a rule of law at all‚ but a practice laid down by the court for its own guidance; and this practice can be amended or altered. Thus‚ the precedent should be deemed
Premium Stare decisis Common law Law