was most effective-democracy or absolutism- for the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe? During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two forms of government. The two forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of government were effective in their own ways. Absolutism though was the most effective during this time. Absolutism is when the ruler has unlimited power. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the
Premium Government Monarchy Form of government
philosophical ideas and periods like the Reformation‚ Absolutism‚ and the Enlightenment. During the eighteenth century‚ France went through a period of turmoil. The French people 8much of the money and power‚ while they were left to suffer in poverty. A combination of ideas and changes were necessary to achieving a revolution. The Reformation movement was created when Martin Luther published his 95 Theses‚ debating how the church was run. Absolutism was created when money was being managed so badly that
Premium French Revolution Age of Enlightenment Protestant Reformation
Petruccio Global October 15‚ 2006 DBQ Absolutism and Democracy During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two forms of government. The two forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism though was the most effective during this time. Absolutism is when the ruler has unlimited power. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the
Free Political philosophy Government Separation of powers
In what ways and to what extent did absolutism affect the power and status of the European nobility in the period 1650 to 1750? Use examples from at least TWO countries. France: decreased nobility power‚ Louis XIV gave nobles very little power‚ made them his “lapdogs” at Versailles‚ result of the Fronde rebellion Russia: decreased nobility power‚ Peter the Great let ranking in armies be based on ability‚ giving lower class people the opportunity to move up‚ nobility did not like his reforms
Premium Monarchy Louis XIV of France Middle Ages
Enlightened absolutism was not a contemporary term to the European rulers it now describes. Consequently‚ interpretations of enlightened absolutists vary and are dependent on the time of analysis. The term was developed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and since then its interpretation has evolved. The idea of enlightened absolutism‚ however‚ was observed and the principles were familiar in the second half of the eighteenth century among certain rulers. At first‚ the term was only applied
Premium Age of Enlightenment
Democracy vs. Absolutism During the 1500’s there was a debate if the government should be Absolutism‚ or Democracy. There both really good ways to live but Democracy had a better limit. Democracy gave the people and the government freedom of speech‚ it limited the power of the government‚ and it protected them. Absolutism had a absolute monarch running the country. Democracy gave the people freedom of speech. Everyone deserves to speak their mind. Voltaire said “I may disapprove of what
Free Separation of powers Law Human rights
Ethical Consideration Though not all real estate agents are members of the National Association of Realtors (NAR)‚ those who do join the group agree to abide by a code of ethics. That code essentially stipulates that Realtors deal with all parties of
Premium Real estate Economics Real property
The problem with this type of grouping is that these religions are so very‚ very different. One example is that of Judaism‚ Christianity‚ and Islam being grouped together as the Western religions. Perhaps Islam doesn’t fit into this statement so well but for Christianity and Judaism people tend to think that these religions are very similar. Furthermore‚ many people know that there are differences between the
Premium Christianity Jesus Islam
Ethical relativism is a moral belief that what may be deemed acceptable by “one person or group‚” is not necessarily acceptable nor applicable by or for another. Thus‚ according to this viewpoint morals are based upon individual or cultural philosophies of life. Consequently‚ relativism expels moral absolutes‚ beings morality is “a matter of personal taste or preference.” In this forum I am to determine whether I agree or disagree with this viewpoint‚ I disagree. To approve of this mindset‚ I
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Relativism
Max Mayer HIS 102 Prof. McGowen GTF Nick O’Neill Feb 25‚ 2013 Absolutism Most historians would argue that the years 1660 to 1789 could be summarized as an Age of Absolutism‚ the period from the Restoration in England and the personal rule of Louis XIV up to the beginning of the French Revolution. Our textbook defines absolutism as “a political arrangement in which one ruler possesses unrivaled power (Western Civilization pg 184). Rulers received their power directly from God – theory of divine
Premium Monarchy Absolute monarchy