The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth and Online Review Characteristics on a Hotel Choice Neema Gurung Southeast Missouri State University Abstract Word of mouth whether it is traditional or online is always found to have influential effect on the purchasing decision making of the consumers. It is especially seen to be more significant in the hospitality and tourism products and services since it contains more
Premium Peer review Decision making Scientific method
Reviews‚ Reputation‚ and Revenue: The Case of Yelp.com Michael Luca Working Paper 12-016 September 16‚ 2011 Copyright © 2011 by Michael Luca Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Reviews‚ Reputation‚ and Revenue: The Case of Yelp.com Michael Luca† September 2011 Abstract Do online
Premium Take-out Restaurant Regression analysis
Remember-NYTimes.com." Movie Reviews‚ Showtimes and Trailers - Movies - New York Times - The New York Times. 25 Jan. 2002. Web. 12. Aug. 2012. <http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review? * "Dear John." StudyMode.com. 12 Aug. 2012. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Dear-John-548105.html>. * "A Walk to Remember (2002) - IMDb." IMDb - Movies‚ TV and Celebrities. 1990. Web. 12 Aug 2012. <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0281358/>. * "Dear John by Nicholas Sparks - Book Review of Dear John - Nicholas
Premium Nicholas Sparks
Sign Up Help (/faq) Log in (/login) Book Reviews : Mahasweta Devi‚ Mother of 1084. Translated with an Introductory Essay by Samik Bandyopadhyay. Calcutta: Seagull Books‚ 1997. 130 pages. Rs 160. Mahasweta Devi and Usha Ganguli‚ Rudali—From Fiction to Performance. Translated with an Introductory Essay by Anjum Katyal. Calcutta: Seagull Books‚ 1997. 156 pages‚ Rs 175. Mahasweta Devi‚ Five Plays. Translated by Samik Bandyopadhyay. Cal cutta : Seagull Books‚ 1997. 149 pages. Rs 150. Mahasweta
Premium Hinduism Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak Mahasweta Devi
(or editors) determines whether to reject the submission outright or begin the process of peer review. In the latter case‚ the submission becomes subject to anonymous peer-review by outside scholars of the editor’s choosing. The number of these peer reviewers (or "referees") varies according to each journal’s editorial practice — typically‚ no fewer than two‚ and usually at least three outside peers review the article. The editor(s) uses the reviewers’ opinions in determining whether to publish the
Free Academic publishing Peer review
Peer Review Analysis‚ Week 5 BUS/475 December 8‚ 2014 Gregory Kosicki Peer Review Analysis Team A reviewed the papers of Crystal Thomas and Valerie Sanchez for our final team review. The previous two reviews provided the team members being evaluated with constructive criticism and acknowledgements of their success. The review process also provided the team members giving the reviews with insights into how to improve their assignments. This final review will accomplish the same goals. Crystal Thomas
Premium Balanced scorecard Peer review Management
Final Year Project Review Tutorials 5. Project Profile Document Part 2 Preparation This tutorial will take place in the week beginning 25th February 2013. Check your on-line timetable for details. Before the tutorial‚ you should prepare and print out a draft copy of Part 2 of your Project Profile Document. This part of the document is all about the context of your project. Think of it as the sort of thing you might use to help you prepare for a job interview to show that you have an awareness
Premium Peer review Tutorial Tutor
How to critically appraise a paper How to review a paper 1 Checklist for a qualitative research paper 3 Checklist for material provided by a pharmaceutical company representative 4 Checklist for a paper that claims to validate a diagnostic or screening test 4 Checklist for a set of clinical guidelines 4 Checklist for a systematic review or meta-analysis 4 Checklist for an economic analysis 5 Checklist for health care organisations working towards an evidence based culture
Premium Scientific method Academic publishing Peer review
WRITING AN ACADEMIC BOOK REVIEW Writing a book review may be an unfamiliar exercise‚ it is not as complex a task as writing an essay requiring a lot of library research. It is‚ however‚ not the same as a book review in The Age‚ which is written for the general reader. Your book review is written for a reader (your lecturer or tutor) who is knowledgeable in the discipline and is interested not just in the coverage and content of the book being reviewed‚ but also in your critical assessment of
Premium Theory Scientific method Literary criticism
in fifth grade. A primary goal is to improve my instruction with the twelve inclusion kids I have this year. Ruth Berry encourages teachers to take risk (2006). The article has been peer-reviewed and therefore considered to be scholarly. The peer review also supports as a source of authority. Berry‚ R. W. (2006). Teacher talk during whole-class lessons: Engagement strategies to support the verbal participation of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Blackwell
Premium Peer review Academic publishing Academia