Assessment 4 Critical Appraisal Critical appraisal article on “Quality nursing care in the words of nurses” Burhans & Alligood (2010) Journal of advance nursing 66(8). This part will be short description of author’s qualifications‚ abstract‚ literature review‚ which methods was used to reveal answer for the research questions‚ findings on six essential themes‚ discussion on responsibility and quality nursing care. The title is clearly defined as research on ‘Quality nursing care in the words of
Premium Nursing Patient Nurse
and professional challenges and the question whether the nursing profession allows one to lead a happy‚ fulfilling life‚ which is the ultimate human goal‚ therefore need to be addressed. Nemcek (2007) and Brown (2009) have attempted to address these particular issues precisely in their quantitative and qualitative studies respectively. The former has followed a thorough and well designed approach to evaluate the three facets of life of a nursing practitioner identified by her‚ which she labels as the
Free Nursing Registered nurse
According to Schneider‚ Elliot‚ LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2004)‚ qualitative research methods‚ search for the meaning and understanding of human experiences in a naturalistic setting. A researcher obtains subjective facts in order to explore the experiences of each participant (Schneider‚ Elliot‚ LoBiondo-Wood & Haber 2004). As a result‚ qualitative research is a means in which a researcher gains an insight into the participant’s point of view concerning their personal experiences; in order gain an
Premium Qualitative research Research methods
Appraisal of the Clinical Guidelines for stroke Management 2010 related to your specific discipline (Nursing) scenario. Introduction: There is the responsibility for health professionals to take good care of patients‚ also to seek and provide better choice and outcomes for clinical practice. Therefore‚ as nurses should develop critically appraising research skill in order to improve the clinical practice outcomes and nursing care from the current evidence includes Clinical Guidelines‚ evidence-based
Premium Nursing Patient Health care
critique a qualitative study? Powers (2011a) states‚ “All scientific evidence is important to clinical decision making‚ and all evidence must be critically appraised to determine its contribution to that decision making” (p. 135). A qualitative study attempts to describe an experience from the participant’s perspective. Additionally‚ to enhance understanding‚ the objective of a qualitative study is to increase awareness of human experiences. Performing a critical appraisal of qualitative research requires
Premium Scientific method Quantitative research Qualitative research
Qualitative Research Assignment 1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research ? Yes. In the article‚ the aim of the research was to understand the experience of participants‚ their knowledge about type 2 diabetes‚ and the factors of medication adherence in Malaysia. According to Susan (2010)‚ the five components of PICOT are population‚ issue‚ context‚ outcome‚ and time. According to Al-Qazaz et al (2011)‚ the PICOT was presented by the researcher in the study were‚ P: Type 2diabetes
Premium Qualitative research Scientific method Data analysis
to become resource persons in treatment and recovery.(Appendix 1). Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing. 17‚ 304-311. The above article will be critiqued using Caldwell‚ Henshaw and Taylor’s (2005) critiquing framework as a guide (Appendix 1). The intent is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the research article and demonstrate knowledge and understanding of research methodology. The title of the above article reflects its contents and is easy to interpret‚ as Caldwell‚
Premium Research Qualitative research Scientific method
Critical Appraisal Charlene Clark Loewenberg School of Nursing Abstract The purpose of this critical appraisal is to review a particular recent research article with appropriate implication to nursing practice of the article comparing two acute migraine treatment modalities intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine versus subcutaneous sumatriptan (Kostic‚ Gutierrez‚ Rieg‚ Moore‚ & Gendron‚ 2010). Critical Appraisal Title and Abstract The title “A prospective‚ randomized
Premium
The purpose of this discussion post is to show the difference between qualitative methods and quantitative research methods relating to nursing. In the table below‚ you will find a comparison and contrast between five different elements for both of these methods. I will also provide a sample of each method approach and why this method would be chosen. Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods Data is analyzed from descriptions of informants-Descriptive language Researcher remains detached from the
Premium
Appraisal 1 Critical Appraisal by Gemekia C. Parker A Paper Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for NU 608 EBP & Quality Improvement in Health Care Systems University of South Alabama College of Nursing Fall 2010 Appraisal 2 Introduction Critical appraisal is the process of systematically examining research evidence to assess its validity‚ results‚ and relevance. (Hill‚ 2001) Critical appraisal of research is preformed
Premium Evidence-based medicine Dieting Randomized controlled trial