Divyang.Chandiramani 1st BA.LLB – B Roll no. 1316165 The Government Of India Act of 1919 Ms.Mukta Mane School of Law‚ Christ University Index Serial no | Topic | Page no‚ | 1 | Research Methodology | 3 | 2 | Government of India Act Of 1919 | 4 | 3 | Bibliography | 9 | Research Methodology: Aim To study the Government of India Act of 1919 with regard to the Montague-Chlemsford reforms. Significance These reforms made huge changes in the executive‚ judiciary and the legislature
Premium British Empire India Bihar
Police Negligence and Liability 1 Running Head: Police Neglect/Liability Police Negligence and Liability Police Negligence and Liability 2 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to examine factors involved in police negligence and the extent of liability the officers hold. Are police officers held accountable for their misjudgments or reckless behavior when they are at fault? This paper exams relevant cases in which police officers have been
Premium Police Tort Tort law
Professional and Design Liability BE0892 Practice Specialisation Professional Liability Liability for injury‚ including bodily or personal injury or death‚ and property damage arising out of the negligent act or omission of a professional‚ ie‚ pharmacist‚ physician‚ attorney‚ architect‚ engineer‚ in performance of their professional activities. How can liability arise? Contract Tort Statute and regulations e.g. Supply of Goods and Services Act‚ Building Regs. Express terms Implied terms
Premium Tort law Tort Negligence
Additionally‚ vicarious liability extends to individual partners as well‚ regardless of their individual culpability. The latter principle of spinoff liability is‚ naturally‚ highly detested among members of the partnership‚ in particular members of professional service firms. Intriguingly‚ the principle of vicarious liability has over time attracted different justifications‚ each with its own strengths and weaknesses. In the context of a partnership‚ two forms of vicarious liability are substantial: the
Premium Ethics Business ethics Morality
Doctrinal bases of liability 4 1.1. Reasonable Care and Skill . 4 1.2. Fiduciary Law 5 1.3. Knowing Receipt‚ Inconsistent Dealing‚ and Assistance 6 1.4. Emerging Standard: Due Diligence‚ Suitability‚ Good Faith 7 2. Duty to advise and the liability for the advice given 8 2.1. Duty to advise 8‚ 9 2.2. Liability for advice given 10 Referencing 12 Introduction In this report I defined the duties and liabilities of a Banker under Advisory and Transactional liability in Banking
Premium Trustee Fiduciary Common law
The hospital is only responsible for any injury to Mr. Jones as a result of improper care. Dr. Simon did not release Mr. Jones as he felt the patient’s condition might be detrimental to his health and emotional state. He may have felt that Mr. Jones was not stable enough to function outside the hospital‚ due to hallucinations and convulsions. However‚ according to the Joint Commission the hospital and Dr. Simon may be liable if they did not do everything possible to prevent Mr. Jones’ departure from
Premium Hospital Patient Joint Commission
the highest level of significance. Therefore‚ product liability is known as an issue which can jeopardize whole the business. There are many cases about companies who went bankrupt due to small potential liability issues which in normal circumstances nobody noticed and considered them as a factor. That is why only experienced and veteran attorneys handle product liability concerns and that is the reason why a company must consider product liability as one of its potential risks with high level of consequences
Free Product liability Tort
Definition of Products Liability (PL) Any cause of action having to do w/a product; not a cause of action in and of itself; rather‚ it has to do with an injury or accident arising out of the use of a product (any product sold in the stream of commerce; must be sold by a merchant) Theories of Liabilities / Causes of Actions a. Negligence(§ B - pp. 2 - 3) i. Introduction
Premium Implied warranty Warranty Contract law
Vicarious Liability Monday‚ January 12‚ 2015 10:00 PM Vicarious Liability is where one person is held liable for the torts of another. This is usually where an employer is liable for the torts of employee. For the employer to be liable: i) A tort‚ (such as negligence‚ battery or even in breach of statutory duty (Majrowski v Guys and St Thomas’s NHS Trust 2007)) ii) committed by his employee‚ iii) during the course of employment. • Original defendant (employee) must be liable in tort first Prepared
Premium Tort law Strict liability Negligence
The two occupier liability acts are‚ the 1957 act covers liability of occupier for injury suffered by lawful visitors. The Duty of care under the 1957 Act is only for people who have permission to be on the site (invitees or licensees) there is no duty of care for trespassers under this act. The 1984 act offers defence for trespassers as to the lawful visitor’s act of 1957. The occupier of the land owes a duty if he knows or has a rational thought as to if the ground is dangerous. The 1957 Act is
Premium Law Tort Tort law