that both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are justified with their views on human nature. I believe that human nature is both naturally good and bad but its nature is separate from the actions and beliefs of an individual. Most controversially‚ I think this can apply to the infamous Adolf Hitler. Evidently‚ Hitler possessed many negative natures‚ it seemed. Hitler was described as controlling and he was very greedy especially when it came to power which reflects the views of Thomas Hobbes. Even at a
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes State of nature
conclusions that made them very famous. Rene Descartes and John Locke were two philosophers that had the same idea‚ but different views of it. Descartes was a rationalist‚ which are people that argue that only reason can separate reality from illusion and give meaning to experience. The idea that eliminates reasoning can produce certain truths about reality and those important truths can be discovered without observations‚ experiment‚ or experience. Locke on the other hand was an empiricist. An empiricist
Premium Mind Epistemology Metaphysics
Political Controversy by a Malmesbury man “Thomas Hobbes was a man who boasted of his timidity as other men do of their courage. He was fearful of the dark‚ thieves‚ death and the wrath of the powerful men he offended; but this did not deflect him from his determination to seek the truth and inform the world of his findings.” The quote represents the personality of Thomas Hobbes because of the descriptions of what other might have thought of him. Thomas Hobbes was born in 1588
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes State of nature
John Locke‚ whose focus on The Rule Of Law‚ believes that humans(independent agents) who join political society(protection:rule of law) that the end result is to preserve and enlarge freedom. He believed “In all the states of created beings capable of law‚ where there is no law‚ there is no freedom”.(pg.107) Locke focused on rights and laws‚ where he believed that people left the “lawless state of nature”‚due to having no independent judge.(p.106) Locke’s principle suggests separation of the legislative
Premium Political philosophy John Locke Property
John Locke “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain‚ but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings capable of law‚ where there is no law‚ there is no freedom” – John Locke. What I feel that John Locke is attempting to express in his quote is that society believes that by having laws in place the government is taking away from the freedom they long to endure. However‚ by having laws in place it actually helps to enforce their rights to freedom. I chose
Premium John Locke United States Declaration of Independence Political philosophy
1. a. Locke denies innate principles‚ as there are no principles to which all mankind give a universal assent. He begins his denial of innate principles by stating that “Universal consent proves nothing innate” (pg. 319‚ 3.). With this statement he claims that even if there were universal principles that all mankind agreed with‚ this would still not prove these principles innate if there could be any way to show how those in agreement came to consent to these ideas. But‚ for Locke‚ there are no universal
Premium John Locke Empiricism Philosophy
the likes of Hobbes‚ Rousseau and Locke wrote about it‚ it means man when he was natural in his state of nature‚ uninfluenced by society‚ and the temptations of today. There are no rights in a state of nature‚ only freedom to do as one wishes. It is a term used to illustrate the theoretical condition of civilization before the states foundation in Social Contract Theories. In the dictionary it is described as “a wild primitive state untouched by civilization.” Both Hobbes and Locke discuss the state
Premium Social contract Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes Human nature since the beginning of time has been to fight for control over things someone found useful . To “control” something that would make yourself powerful or even god-like. Most have tried by force ‚ fear and even love to control various things from land and weapons and even smaller things like rice and water . It has taken figures with strong mentalitys to pause the everyday fight for key essentials to focus and sometimes even dedicate their life to the humans and
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes
with this scientist and the church continue to have arguments such as how the earth was created. The discussion continued for group A with the thoughts of the discussions of the different philosophers. While several people discussed how Thomas Hobbes or John Locke were the most influential philosophers I thought it was very
Premium Science Religion Scientific method
CODE : PH 101 COURSE NAME : POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY COMPUTER NO. : 12116173 QUESTION : List and explain six differences and six similarities between the political philosophy of John Locke and that of Tomas Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were philosophers from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The two men both had very strong views on freedom and how a country should be governed. Their view points are famous for contrasting one another. Hobbes has more of a pessimistic
Premium Political philosophy Social contract