Organisational Behavior BU4605 BA (Hons) Business Administration LECTURER SETTING ASSESSMENT: - Mervin Sookun 1. INTRODUCTION This paper is designed to study the behavior of “12 ANGRY MEN” and how they react to their responsibilities as individuals and as a group. The 12 men depicted in this movie are members constituted from different classes of a society‚ from an architect to a broker to a man brought up in the slums. Their one and only goal is to decide unanimously whether or not the
Premium Risk Jury Decision making
Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting film. As the evidence is brought up to question by the jurors themselves. The complexity of this case grew as the films went on. Then came the hard part‚ making the decision‚ guilty or not guilty. Especially when you have jurors that are over shadowed by prejudice that influence their decision. It is only when prejudice is set aside that the jurors’ are able to make a more logical decision on the case. As the movie continues‚ all twelve jurors slowly arrive
Premium Film Crime Violence
12 Angry Men Motivation Paper Written By: Olivia Bumgardner Imagine having to decide a young boy’s fate who is accused of murder in the first degree. This is the case in “Twelve Angry Men”‚ the prize-winning drama written by Reginald Rose. Some jurors address relevant topics‚ while others permit their personal “judgments” from thoroughly looking at the case. After hours of deliberation‚ the jurors reached the decision that the boy is not guilty
Premium Thought Mind Common law
Many interesting principles discussed in social psychology are applicable to everyday situations‚ current events‚ and movies. Specifically‚ the movie “Twelve Angry Men”‚ written by Reginald Rose‚ is a 1957 drama that illustrates a prime example of groupthink and the probable effects it can have on a group’s decision-making. In this classic movie‚ twelve members of a jury are isolated in a conference room to debate the outcome of a murder trial involving a young man stabbing his father. From the first
Premium Jury Verdict
round of the voting progress‚ his offensive behavior by blaming the 12th juror and forced him to cast a “guilty” vote. In fact‚ he forced others to vote the “guilty”. This tough attitude and even elderly rude made him debate with others all the time which eventually led to the collapse of his allies. For the 8th judger‚ as he is an architect‚ and under the influence of his job nature‚ he has a rigorous thought‚ he can analysis every detail very carefully. And during the first voting progress‚ only
Premium Jury Not proven Boy
Twelve Angry Men In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginad Rose the twelve jurors have to decide if a young boy is guilty or not guilty. The boy is accused of the murder of his father. His fate lies in the hands of the twelve jurors. Will he get the death penalty? Will they prove that the young boy is not guilty? Will he get to live the rest of his life? There are many different versions of this story including William Friedkins film version produced in 1997. Friedkins film version is easier
Premium Jury Court Judge
you have to learn how to get along and deal with others as in Respecting them that play a big part in my life as well. I try my best to respect everyone cause I won’t everyone to respect me. 12 Angry Men 1. The character that has the best critical thinking is Davis which was juror number eight. Davis looked through the case in every spectrum‚ he went to the young man neighbor hood to check out what kind of environment he was living in he basically did his own research as well as looking
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs
“12 Angry Men” The movie “12 Angry Men” takes place in a room within a courthouse where 12 men that have been selected for jury duty must decide the fate of a murder suspect. The group of men is made up of a diverse ethnic and social background which plays an important part in their decisions throughout the movie. In regards to Tuckman’s stages‚ the group introduce themselves to each other while acknowledging their purpose as jurors. After a lengthy trial they are finally able to talk openly
Premium Jury Verdict Decision making
12 Angry Men I believe in the beginning the 2 main jurors who were basing their decisions on prejudice were mainly Jurors #3 and #10. Juror #3 more based on prejudices of young men‚ particularly because he had such a horrendous relationship with his own son‚ I feel like this case really hit him close to home and really affected him in a personal way. I believe he let his feelings got in the way of his logical thinking and was practically projecting the anger he had towards his son towards the
Premium Jury Discrimination Thought
12 Angry Men Summary Fucking hot in the room…say something about the environment Coach -sets the stage for the negotiation by assigning seats based on juror number -said “you fellas can handle this any way you want to‚ im not going to make any rules”…he should have assumed more of a leadership role from the start -showed signs of becoming a good mediator by redirecting Advertising man’s attention back to the discussion. But then‚ he said to HF “and we might be able to show you were you were
Premium English-language films William Golding White people