MAN 4720 Nov. 15‚ 2011 Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the Vioxx Recall In 1999 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved Vioxx‚ what would become Merck’s “blockbuster” drug. Although the FDA had approved the drug there was uncertainty of the safety of drug. Vioxx was approved to treat a variety of conditions‚ such as osteoarthritis and acute pain‚ but there was also a chance that it would increase cardiovascular problems. What I found most interesting about this case was the changes in how drugs
Premium Pharmacology Advertising Clinical trial
August 3rd‚ 2014 Case 5: Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the Vioxx Recall Section I Merck was one of the world’s leading pharmaceutical firms. The company ranked 4th I sales after Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson and it ranked 5th in assets and market value. Merck ranked 1st in profits‚ earning $7.33 billion on $30.78 billion in sales. In 2006‚ Merck faced major challenges with their once best selling prescription painkillers‚ Vioxx which was pulled off the market in September of 2004 after Merck learned it increased
Free Pharmacology Food and Drug Administration
Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the VIOXX Recall MBA 520 Ethics and Leadership in a Global Environment 11.15.2009 MBA 520 15 November 2009 Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the VIOXX Recall In 1999‚ Merck started a clinical trial called VIGOR‚ checking the effectiveness of VIOXX in patients with gastrointestinal problems‚ and in this trial they noted for the first time that patients taking VIOXX suffered roughly twice as many heart attacks and strokes as those taking the control‚ Naproxen.
Premium Social responsibility Clinical trial Corporate social responsibility
Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the Vioxx Recall 1. Do you believe that Merck acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner with regard to Vioxx? Why or Why not? In your answer‚ please address the company’s drug development and testing‚ marketing and advertising‚ relationships with government regulators and policymakers‚ and handling of the recall. I do not believe that Merck made a socially responsible decision when Vioxx was introduced into the pharmaceutical market. Scientists that were involved
Premium Pharmacology
Merck‚ Vioxx and the FDA Recall‚ case no. 6 1. I believe that Merck was completely responsible for everything that came along with releasing Vioxx to the public. The signs that the drug might not be as safe as they had hoped for should have been enough for them to halt on the release. It was unethical thing they did was not do all the research to find out how serious the effects of the drug really were. 2. Merck should have run more tests and found out the severity of the symptoms‚ and seen
Free Pharmacology Food and Drug Administration
Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the VIOXX Recall MBA 520-D4C2 Ethics & Leadership in a Global Environment April 22‚ 2012 Merck and Vioxx Recall Did Merck act in social and ethical manner? In 2005‚ Merck was ranked fourth in sales among pharmaceutical companies. Merck had released the drug Vioxx‚ for treating Osteoarthritis in late 1990. Merck as a company has a reputation of being one of the most ethical and
Premium Marketing Brand Management
Running head: CASE STUDY: MERCK & COMPANY: THE VIOXX RECALL Merck & Company: The Vioxx Recall Albert Balogun California Baptist University BUS 520A: Managerial Ethics Jim Bishop‚ PhD June 30‚ 2010 Merck & Company: The Vioxx Recall The issues involved in Merck‚ a pharmaceutical manufacturing company’s recall of one its products‚ Vioxx‚ is the effect of direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drug on the society public
Premium Pharmacology Food and Drug Administration Pharmaceutical industry
Business and Professional Ethics MERCK AND THE MARKETING OF VIOXX – CASE ANALYSIS Questions 1) What are the highlights of the case? 2) What are the ethical issues in the case? 3) What the ethical theories evidenced in the case? 4) How would you resolve the problem? What are the ethical issues in the case? In identifying the issue(s) we first have to identify the level in which this business is operating. Merck & Company was a top‚ well respected pharmaceutical company in America
Premium Ethics
1) Introduction of Vioxx a) Introduction in 1999 b) Withdrawal of the drug in 2004 due to heart attacks c) Merck’s knowledge of the effects of Vioxx and unethical decision to continue to sell the drug 2) Vigor Study d) Vioxx lessened stomach bleeding e) Results also showed higher risk of heart attacks f) Merck blamed naproxen for skewing the results against Vioxx 3) New England Journal of Medicine Omission g) Merck omits three heart attacks
Premium Coronary artery disease Aspirin Hypertension
Merck & Company‚ Inc: The Recall of Vioxx Introduction Geroge W. Merck stated once stated‚ “We try never to forget that medicine is for the people. It is not for the profits. The profits follow. Initially‚ Vioxx was the blockbuster drug that Merck needed due to the upcoming Zocor patent cliff in 2006. With an estimated 27‚785 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths that could have been avoided if Celebrex had been used instead of Vioxx‚ Merck faces the possibility of not only having to pay
Premium Pharmaceutical drug Osteoarthritis Pharmacology