Detention for ‘Dangerous’ Offenders in Australia: A Critical Analysis and Proposals for Policy Development Report to the Criminology Research Council December 2006 [Funded by Grant CRC 03/04-05] Professor Bernadette McSherry Louis Waller Chair of Law‚ Monash University Associate Professor Patrick Keyzer University of Technology Sydney‚ Faculty of Law Professor Arie Freiberg Dean‚ Monash University‚ Faculty of Law ii Preventive Detention for Dangerous Offenders in Australia Acknowledgments
Premium Sex offender Crime
employers. Drug testing at work can be one way to implement a more efficient work environment and control or monitor such difficulties.They also had random drug testing were they would pick a certain percentage of the employees and randomly choose people to take the test. In conclusion these drug tests make the workplace more productive‚ safer‚ and overall better for the environment. i also learned lot of things from the topic citizenship on the phillipines. The documentaries that we have watched
Premium Pharmacology Drug Illegal drug trade
Statistics show 21.2% of low level drug offenders‚ that are incarcerated‚ do not have any current or prior violence in their records‚ no involvement in sophisticated criminal activity and no prior commitment. (USDOJ) Could this be the problem of prisons being over populated? There are many factors that need to be considered when looking for other possible methods of dealing with non-violent drug offenders. Some lawmakers believe the only way to deal with these offenders is to lock them up for long periods
Premium Crime Prison Criminal justice
Amanda McCloskey "Making sex offenders names public." Making sex offenders names public does have there ups and downs but i am totally for it. Sex offenders can be men or women it does not matter about what gender the sex offenders are because either way the adult is the one who is taking the innocents of a child. In most cases the child can know there sex offender. The reasons why i think that sex offenders name should be public are‚ the protection of both genders and children in the
Premium Sex offender Criminal justice
(Intro) Do you believe animals and humans are the same. “A Change of Heart About Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin‚ describes how the lives of animals are all for the benefit of the human race and how animals deserve more respect. Many concerned and caring people believe that animals should be treated with love and respect. The reality of this is that Rifkin doesn’t understand that life without using animals as a benefit is highly unlikely and would just complicate the already complex world we live in today
Premium Human Mammal Intelligence quotient
Laws requiring registration and community notification for convicted sex offenders are not constitutional. Megan’s Law deals with child molesters and sex offenders by requiring a public registration when they are released from incarceration. The concern with registering sex offenders has progressed to a nationalized level‚ with the government requiring every state to have some form of law that deals with Megan ’s Law (Menendez‚ 251). However‚ is this law constitutional? In this position paper the
Premium Law Sex offender Crime
Problem 1 Issue1 Is the La Rochelle website‚ including the slogan‚ protected by copyright law? Law Copyright law protects text‚ images and other forms of expression. The requirements for protection are as follows: (1) The creation is a ‘work’ or ‘subject matter other than works’; (2) The creation is original; (3)The creation is expressed in a material form. Application The slogan is not a ‘work’ or ‘subject matter’ because Single words‚ names‚ titles‚ slogans are too short to be protected
Premium Property Copyright Publishing
Seminar February 8‚ 2013 Megan’s Law is A Violation of a Person’s Rights and Could Cause them Great Harm Megan’s Law and how it is unconstitutional and how it effects the people who must register online. A person who just served his or her time in prison should not have to register. It’s like being sentenced twice for the same crime. This also puts all those individuals involved in serious danger. Not only is Megan’s law unconstitutional‚ it also puts the Offender’s
Premium Sex offender
the spectacle of right vs. right.” The central idea of the tragedies was not about who was right and wrong‚ because those two would be effortless to separate from each other‚ but on who was considered the most right‚ which would many times be difficult to tell apart. Throughout the tragic play‚ Antigone‚ written by the ancient Greek playwright‚ Sophocles‚ Antigone was proven to be the most right. This can be verified since Antigone decided to follow the gods’ law over Creon’s law‚ and the punishment
Premium Sophocles Law Tragedy
citizens. First U.S. Citizens passed laws requiring all sex offenders convicted of a crime to register each year with the local authorizes on their where abouts. Next‚ citizens passed Megan ’s law‚ which allowed authorities to post names‚ addresses‚ and pictures of those registered sex offenders online; allowing anybody to view sex offenders in their neighborhood. The state of California took it to the next level. Proposition 83‚ also known as Jessica ’s Law‚ after a nine year old girl was kidnapped
Premium Sex offender