parties cannot agree on a mutually acceptable name‚ tribunal will make an administrative appointment The general source of securing a list of arbitrators is through impartial agency (Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS); American Arbitration Association (AAA)) and through state and local agencies. There are three procedures in the selection of the arbitrator‚ which are the striking method‚ striking and ranking‚ or by requesting a direct appointment. With the striking method‚ the
Premium Negotiation Arbitration Collective bargaining
Plaintiff NCR Corporation ("NCR") appeals Page 811 the order of the district court[1] compelling NCR and defendant Korala Associates Ltd. ("KAL") to arbitrate NCR’s claims against KAL‚ pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 206[2] part of Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act‚ see 9 U.S.C. § 201‚ et seq.‚ which implements the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards‚ June 10‚ 1958‚ 21 U.S.T. 2517‚ 330 U.N.T.S. 38. I. BACKGROUND NCR is one of the largest providers of
Premium Automated teller machine Supreme Court of the United States Copyright infringement
NEW YORK 198 F. Supp. 2d 377; 2002 U.S. Dist. January 2‚ 2002‚ Decided January 3‚ 2002‚ Filed DISPOSITION: [**1] Defendant ’s motion to compel Brennan to arbitrate denied. Brennan ’s cross-motion to strike the defense of arbitration and stay arbitration granted. COUNSEL: For Plaintiff: Mona C. Engel‚ Esq.‚ Law Offices of Robert F. Danzi‚ Westbury‚ New York. For Defendant: Jed L. Marcus‚ Esq.‚ Gotta‚ Glassman & Hoffman‚ P.A.‚ Roseland‚ New Jersey. JUDGES: SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN
Premium Contract Arbitration
Week 3 by 9/29 TOC TOC \h \z \u \t "Heading 2‚1" Topic 1 Due by Wed Oct 2: PAGEREF _Toc368407018 \h 2Topic 2A Due by Wed Oct 4: PAGEREF _Toc368407019 \h 3P Argument: PAGEREF _Toc368407020 \h 6Rule of Law: PAGEREF _Toc368407021 \h 6Conclusion: PAGEREF _Toc368407022 \h 6References PAGEREF _Toc368407023 \h 8 Each student has to post at least one main posting by WEDNESDAY 11:59 p.m.‚ of each week and respond to all assigned discussion topics by FRIDAY‚ 11:59 p.m.‚ leaving time for you to respond
Premium Arbitration
A L T E R N A T I V E D I S P U T E R E S O L U T I O N I N I N D I A SUBMITTED TO: Prof. VIKRAM KUMAR SUBMITTED BY: AKANKSHA PRIYA ROLL NO. 105. A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T Before starting this project we would like to thank my faculty‚ Prof. Vikram Kumar for giving me such a wonderful topic to work on. The topic was really nice and I were very interested in doing this
Premium Dispute resolution Alternative dispute resolution Mediation
Legislation 6 DAMAGES FOR DELAY - New Developments 6 RCW 4.24.360 6 In the Scoccolo case 6 The City’s franchise agreement with Puget stated in part 7 The TCI franchise agreement 7 RESOLVING DISPUTES THROUGH MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION 7 Tips For Mediating Disputes 7 Arbitration 8 Dispute Resolution Using Project Controls 9 PROJECT CONTROL SYSTEMS 9 Cost Control Systems 9 Network Scheduling 10 Time impact analysis 10 Project Delays‚ Disruptions‚ and Changes In a perfect world‚ all
Premium Arbitration Project management Mediation
Critical Analysis of the Case of Salem Advocates Bar Association v. Union of India. (2005) 6 SCC 344 Facts of the Case The present case Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India[1] is basically an aftermath of the original case Salem Advocates Bar Association‚ Tamil Nadu. v. Union of India[2]. The Honorable Judges presiding over the case were Y.K. Sabharwal‚ D.M. Dharmadhikari and Tarun Chatterjee. The subject is basically related to Constitution and is a case of civil nature. In the former
Premium Dispute resolution Alternative dispute resolution Mediation
Sample International Contract for Sale of Goods‚ pursuant to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods TERAMATE‚ Ltd. with its principal office West Road Drive27‚ Hopson Chart‚ Briston‚ AN4 4FL‚ UK represented by Matt Wattson‚ on the basis of Power of Attorney from 23 June 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the „Seller“ on the first side) and AGFH‚ a. s. ID: 783 33 998 having its principal office at: Palachova 152‚ Prague 2‚ Zip Code: 120 00 registered
Premium Arbitration Contract Contractual term
ensuring the finality of arbitral awards‚ the court must also safeguard the countervailing public interest in ensuring that its processes are not abused by litigants. [emphasis added] 36 In this connection‚ we note that the authors of Singapore Arbitration Legislation ([23]supra) take the view that the threshold for invoking public policy to resist enforcement of a foreign arbitral award (pursuant to s 31(4)(b) of the IAA) is more stringent than that for invoking
Premium Arbitration
THE GROWTH OF ADR IN NIGERIA By Enenche Eleojo 1. INTRODUCTION As human beings‚ we are caught up daily in a complex web of social and commercial interactions. For as long as these interactions continue‚ interests are bound to clash. When interests clash or are in completion with the interest of others then we can say a dispute has arisen. For as long as humans exist there will be disputes. What makes the difference is how the disputes are resolved. Instinctively‚ once a dispute arises
Premium Dispute resolution Law Alternative dispute resolution