COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II‚ CITY OF MANILA PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES‚ Plaintif-Appellee‚ -versus- GA. G.R. No. 123456 PEDRO SARMIENTO Y TORDECILLA Accused-Appellant‚ x------------------------------------------x APPELLEE’S BRIEF SUBMITTED BY OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL #234 Palack St‚ GSIS Building‚ Brgy. Vito Cruz‚ Manila‚ Philippines By Dioxenos Barreras Sulit Associate Solicitor
Premium Criminal law Rape Manila
the Negotiable Instruments Act‚ 1881. In the complaint‚ B.S.N.L. alleged that the cheques were issued to it by the Data Access (India) Limited in discharge of a pre-existing liability based on the business transactions between the companies. The appellant herein and respondent No. 2 in the complaint were the Directors of respondent No. 1 Company and they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of Data Access (India) Limited. The relevant statement in the complaint read: "That
Premium Cheque Legal terms
3. Mr Butters‚ the appellant‚ and Ms Mncora‚ the respondent‚ lived together for nearly 20 years as husband and wife but were never married. Butters was a business owner while Mncora ran their household and raised the children. (para 1) When the relationship ended‚ the respondent claimed half of the appellant’s assets based on the fact that she believed that a tacit universal partnership existed between them. (para 2) 4. Heher JA and Cachalia JA (15) 5. The appellant is appealing the claim
Premium Marriage Law Ontology
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACivil Appeal No. 3401 of 1988Decided On: 16.07.1991Appellants:M/s. Burn Standard Company Ltd. and another Vs. Respondent: Union of India and othersHon’ble Judges/Coram: K. N. Singh and Kuldip Singh‚ JJ.Counsels: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Shankar Ghosh‚ Naresh Bakshi and K.D. Prasad‚ AdvsFor Respondents/Defendant: Ashok H. Desai‚ P. Parmeshwaran and A. Subba Rao‚ Advs.Subject: ExciseCatch WordsMentioned INActs/Rules/Orders: Central Excises and Salt Act‚ 1944
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Manufacturing Duty
is on the Bill of Exchange act. The definition and several examples of other cases concerning this act are mentioned in the case. The actual case that is mentioned is about the appeal from a decision of Judge Robotham date 18th of June 1980. The appellant‚ an architect‚ sued the bank of Nova Scotia after noticing that the bank paid out a check that is noticeable altered. The architect wants the bank to pay back the 6000 dollars that the bank deducted from their bank account plus interest and other
Premium Appeal Money Credit card
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION‚ PUNJAB SCO NO. 32-33-34‚ SECTOR 17-C‚ CHANDIGARH Mrs. Naveen‚ W/o Late Sh. Shiv Kumar Abrol‚ R/o H. No. 95‚ Shingari Gali Chhota‚ Bazar Qadian‚ Tehsil – Batala‚ Distt. Gurdaspur … Complainant Versus Public Information Officer‚ O/o Senior Superintendent of Police‚ Batala‚ Distt. Gurdaspur. …Respondent Complaint Case no- 2799/2013 ORDER Present : Representative‚ Mr. Aman Abrol‚ for the complainant. Mr. Parkash Singh
Premium Punjab Appeal Punjabi language
224 of the Penal Code minor offence in relation to s. 215 of the Penal Code. Headnote The appellant was convicted of attempting to cause death contrary to s. 215 of the Penal Code. The learned judge held that following some kind of difference the appellant had armed himself with three spears and attacked the complainant. The only question that arose for decision in this appeal was whether the appellant was correctly convicted of attempting to cause the death of the complainant or whether he should
Premium Criminal law Crime
SUNIL INDUSTRIES versus RAM CHANDER PRADHAN & ANR Dated: 14 November 2000 Appellant: M/S. SUNIL INDUSTRIES Respondent: RAM CHANDER PRADHAN & ANR Bench: S.N.VARIAVA‚ S.R.BABU Judgement: S. N. VARIAVA‚ J. ACT: WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT‚ 1923 Supreme Court Case INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE This Appeal is against an Order dated 7th May‚ 1997 by which the first appeal filed by the appellant has been dismissed in limine. Briefly stated the facts are as follows: The Petitioner
Premium Index finger Finger Appeal
State of U.P . Where Appellant Asgar has been convicted under Sec. 302 of IPC for intentionally causing the murder of one Ramswaroop Singh on account of an alleged dispute concurring the repayment of debt. On appeal Supreme Court held (Justice UNITWALLIA): "The High Court while confirming the death sentence does not seem to have clearly kept in view the change of law which was brought about by the 1955 amendment of the old code‚ when the
Premium Crime Capital punishment Murder
Wright v.Kehoe‚ 2010 ONSC 319(CanLII) Parties: David Kehoe and Total Credit Recovery Ltd. – Appellants Camille Wright – Respondent Date of Decision: January 12‚ 2010 Facts: On November 27‚ 2008‚ Camille Wright was awarded damages for slander and costs on a substantial indemnity basis in her lawsuit against David Kehoe and his employer Total Credit Recovery Ltd‚ a collection agency. In an effort to collect money owed from Ms. Wright for a leased car‚ which had been repossessed by the lessor
Premium Jury Law Tort