The issue is whether the district court erred when it refused to reconsider a state court’s order instructing Appellant Tampa Sports Authority’s policy of conducting pat-down searches of all ticket holders seeking to attend Tampa Bay Buccaneers games at the Raymond James Stadium in Tampa‚ Florida. Holding: In this case‚ it was a clear error for the district court
Premium United States The Star-Spangled Banner National Football League
Nicholas)Tong)Wei)Jie) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Nick’s Admin Law " ) 2012-2013 Exam Notes " 0)Page)1)of)20)0) Nicholas)Tong)Wei)Jie) ) GENERAL" ESSAY)WRITING)TIPS) SUMMARY:)Summary)of)what)happened)in)one)sentence)e.g.)_____)applied)for)a)licence)but)did)not)get)it.) REMEDIES:)_______)is)seeking)judicial)review)of))__________’s)decision)to)_________.)) Incorporate)desired)remedies)(certiorari/mandamus/prohibition)) GROUNDS"OF"REVIEW:)Give)a)short)summary)of)your)analysis)e.g.)A)has)3)potential)grounds)for)review
Premium Law
MBA560 COUGHLIN v TAILHOOK 112 F.3d 1052 (1997) United States Court of Appeals‚ Ninth Circuit Facts: During a convention at the Las Vegas Hilton in September 1991‚ Navy Lieutenant Paula Coughlin was attacked by a group of men in a hotel hallway. The resulting post-traumatic stress disorder and other problems related to the attack eventually hampered her ability to perform her duties. Ultimately‚ she resigned from the US Navy. Coughlin brought action against the Hilton Hotels Corporation
Premium Tort Jury Nevada
Mercer should have had equal opportunity in making the squad. Duke University operates a Division I college football team. During the period relevant to this appeal (1994-98)‚ appellate Fred Goldsmith was head coach of the Duke football team and appellant Heather Sue Mercer was a student at the school. Legal Issues- Mercer claims that the coach Fred Goldsmith made offensive remarks about her gender. She was cut from the team in 1996‚ and claimed that the reason she was cut was because of her sex
Premium National Collegiate Athletic Association United States High school
INTRODUCTION Modesty is not only an ornament‚ but also a guard to virtue… Crimes against women be it female infanticide‚ child marriage‚ pedophilia‚ sexual harassment‚ dowry deaths‚ physical abuse‚ etc follow them as a constant scare from cradle to grave. We might just believe that position of women in our country has improved‚ especially in bigger states‚ but that is nothing other than a myth. We might have progressed but what’s the point in boasting of our growth-story if it hasn’t taught us
Premium Woman Supreme Court of the United States Crime
CASE DIGESTS: 1. ALCANTARA vs. ALCANTARA FACTS: On Dec. 8‚ 1982‚ petitioner Restituto Alcantara and respondent Rosita Alcantara‚ without securing the required marriage license‚ went to Manila City Hall for the purpose of marriage. They met a “fixer” and arranged everything for them. A Rev. Aquilino Navarro‚ a Minister of Gospel of the CDCC Chapel solemnized their wedding. The petitioner and respondent went through another marriage ceremony on March 16‚ 1983. The marriage was likewise celebrated
Premium Marriage Wedding
Regina (Rottman) V Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2002] 2 AC 692 [2002] UKHL 20 House of Lords 16th May 2002 Lord Nichols of Birkenhead‚ Lord Hoffman Lord Hope of Craighead‚ Lord Hutton and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry The powers of the police to search and seize property from private premises with an arrest warrant issued under S.8. of the Extradition Act 1989 . Whether the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 ss. 17‚ 18 and 19 or common law powers to search and seize extends to
Premium Law Arrest Police
3a) Explain the way(s) in which the historical development of the equitable jurisdiction informs our contemporary understandings of the relationship between law and equity. Historical development of equity Until 14th Century‚ if justice was not achieved‚ a litigant could appeal to the king in King’s council (Curia Regis). The council possessed royal power and could thereby make order to delegate the hearing of injustice function to the Chancellor. Starting from 15th Century all petitions went directly
Free Common law
Offer Proposal is defined under section 2(a) of the Indian contract Act‚ 1872 as "when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything with a view to obtain the assent of that other to such act or abstinence‚ he is said to make a proposal/offer". Thus‚ for a valid offer‚ the party making it must express his willingness to do or not to do something. But mere expression of willingness does not constitute an offer. The rules regarding the offer are The offer
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
Law 494 Part 1 Shlensky v. Wrigley Facts: William Shlensky (plaintiff/appellant)‚ minority stock holder for the Chicago Cubs baseball team sued the team directors who deferred the case to Phillip Wrigley (defendant/appellee) stating mismanagement and negligence because of the refusal of the directors in installing lights at Wrigley Field‚ home field for the Chicago Cubs. Procedural History: Plaintiff original case was lost at trial and plaintiff appealed. Issue: The issue
Premium Corporation Limited liability company