namely the shop house project and the TAR Centre. FACTS OF THE CASE: • The appellant become the sole developer of the TAR Centre project after it had acquired Tamasa Holding’s share for a cash consideration of RM 572758. • The development expenses and costs relating to the two projects such as shop house project and the TAR Centre‚ were capitalised in the development accounts of the appellant. • The income of RM 35914865.48 come from the proceeds of sales of the shop houses
Premium Real estate Expense Revenue
revoked it. In 2008‚ Ms. Lindsay stated that she had left “everything” to the appellant in her Will. Nora Lindsay passed away on 16 October 2012‚ aged 90 and was survived be her two children; the appellant‚ Geoffrey Lindsay and the respondent‚ Heather McGrath. The appellant considered that the deceased may have passed away without a last Will and was granted Letters of Administration on the basis of intestacy. The appellant obtained a five-page handwritten document from
Premium Document Documents
15thFebruary 2010 Saira Banu MLS Tutorial: 3-4 pm Cases i) Strait Settlements Reception of English Law Case Kamoo v Thomas Turner Bassett In the Goods of Abdullah Facts Pf‚ a native from Bengal‚ had agreed in June 1806 to be employed by the Df‚ as a “khidmuggur” or a table servant in Penang at a salary of $6/mnth. Unfortunately‚ since his employment‚ the Pf had been severely ill-treated by the Df. On July 20‚ 1907‚ the Pf was whipped 20 times with a rattan by an order by the Df. Pf complained
Premium Common law Malaysia
harm others. This concept is known as the "harm principle". The cases of R. v. Malmo-Levine and R. v. Caine deal with the possession of marihuana and the appellants argue that criminalization and punishment of possession of marihuana goes against their rights as stated by section 7 in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The appellants rely on the harm principle as a principle of fundamental justice and suggest that such criminalization is a violation towards that fundamental principle. The
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Law
Port Trust (Second Respondent) entrusted the work of construction of certain bridges to Afcon Infrastructure Ltd ( Appellants) in 2001. The Appellants sub-contracted a part of the said work to Cherian Varkey Construction (First Respondent) duirng the same year without any provision for reference to arbitration. II) M/s Cherian Varkey Construction filed a suit against the appellant for recovery Rs 2‚10‚70‚881/- along with interest of 18% per annum. In the suit an order of attachment was made in
Free Alternative dispute resolution Dispute resolution Civil procedure
2000 CASE DIGESTS C R I M I N A L L A W SUMMARY OF DOCTRINES JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES Self-Defense The invocation of self-defense is an admission of the killing and its authorship. By this admission‚ the burden of proof shifts to the accused who must establish all elements of the justifying circumstance. The nature and number of wounds inflicted disprove the plea of self-defense because they demonstrate determined effort to kill and not just defend himself. (People v. Magayac
Premium Criminal law Rape
As your lady is aware the advertisement identified that the offer was to remain open until the end of March. One would likely presume this meant the offer was open until the 31st of the month and this was the day on which the appellant expressed his wish to withdraw his offer. The 31st however fell upon a Saturday‚ a day on which the shop was closed for trading. The law in question must therefore consider if the remained open until the last day of March or the offer did in fact finish on the last
Premium Contract
parts of a larger transaction. Liability may be attached where at some point in the series of acts‚ the accused has the necessary mens rea even if the mens rea does not coincide precisely in time with act causing death. Argument by the appellant: The appellant contended that the two acts done were separate acts. The first act was done accompanied by mens rea which did not caused the death but the second act that caused death. They argued that the second act was not accompanied by mens rea‚ therefore
Premium Causality Death Criminal law
Tay Kim Chuan Patrick v PublicAccountants Board Facts The appellant ("Tay")‚ who was a publicaccountant‚ appeared before an Inquiry Committee ("IC") appointed by the respondent ("PAB")‚ where he faced 19 charges concerning breaches of professional and technical standards. The appellant was then suspended for 18 months on the ground of professional misconduct. On appeal‚ he denied the allegation of professional misconduct and asserted that the penalty was too harsh. Held‚ dismissing the appeal:
Premium Audit Profession Financial audit
that before there can be a verdict of guilty‚ the prosecution must make the jury feel sure that the verdict is the right one - Imprecise. Criminal Law - Defence of automatism - Unsworn statement of accused - No foundation for defence. The appellant was convicted of the murder of his wife and sentenced to death. On his appeal it was con-tended‚ inter alia‚ that: (i) the learned trial judge’s directions to the jury on standard of proof were defective; and (ii) the learned trial judge was in error
Premium Jury Law Appeal