Kupferman Written by: Andres Torres Procter and Gamble Case Study Analysis Actors: 1. Alan Lafley: Head of P&G Beauty Care GBU 2. Paolo de Cesare: President of Max Factor Japan 3. Durk Jager: P&G CEO 4. GLT: Global Leadership Team (made up of business GM’s of crucial MDO’s‚ people from R&D‚ consumer research‚ product supply‚ HR‚ and finance). Chaired by Lafley. INTRO: In this case study we are introduced to P&G as an organization and their changes in structure overtime
Premium Procter & Gamble China Marketing
(odds: 23‚220:1) and Johnson & Johnson (odds: 15‚275:1). While some might dismiss the results‚ not surprisingly‚ the companies at the top of the list do not. “We are a leadership engine and a talent machine‚” said retiring Procter & Gamble CEO A. G. Lafley. Questions 1. Management consulting firms did very well on a per-employee basis‚ partly because they are mostly made up of managers (as opposed to blue-collar or entry-level workers). How big a factor do you think composition of the workforce is
Premium Management consulting Leadership
Final Exam Study Guide Building Leadership Skills Chapter 7 1. Discuss the differences between micro and macro leadership a. Who is the leader? Micro: One person heading a group‚ team‚ or department Macro: A person heading a whole organization with a variety of titles (president‚ CEO‚ COO); Top Management Team (MT; governance body such as board of directors b. What is the scope? Micro: Small group‚ team‚ or department Macro: Entire organization c. Where is the primary focus? Micro:
Premium Leadership
(odds: 23‚220:1)‚ and Johnson & Johnson (odds: 15‚275:1). While some might dismiss the results‚ not surprisingly‚ the companies at the top of the list do not. “We are a leadership engine and a talent machine‚” said retiring P&G CEO A. G. Lafley. Questions 1. Management consulting firms did very well on a per-employee basis‚ partly because they are mostly comprised of managers (as opposed to blue-collar or entry-level workers). How big a factor do you think composition of the workforce
Premium Management consulting Management
‚ 130-185. Johnson‚ B. (2012‚ October 29). Procter & Gamble Co. ’s Advertising Spending‚ 1987 to 2012. Retrieved June 10‚ 2014‚ from AdAge: http://adage.com/article/special-report-pg-at-175/procter-gamble-s-advertising-spending-1987-2012/237974/ Lafley‚ A M.E.‚ P. (2004). Generic Competitive Strategies. Competitive Advantage‚ porter M.E ‚ 11-25. P&G Annual Cash Flow. (2014‚ June 23). Retrieved June 23‚ 2014‚ from The Wall Street Journal: http://quotes.wsj.com/PG/financials/annual/cash-flow P&G.com
Premium Procter & Gamble Strategic management Porter generic strategies
Vision “Touching lives‚ improving life”. Mission Statement We will provide branded products and services of superior quality and value that improve the lives of the world’s consumers. As a result‚ consumers will reward us with leadership sales‚ profit‚ and value creation‚ allowing our people‚ our shareholders‚ and the communities in which we live and work to prosper. History William Procter‚ a candle maker‚ and James Gamble‚ a soap maker‚ immigrants from England and Ireland‚ respectively
Premium Marketing Procter & Gamble Brand management
Five years later—the acquisition by P&G hasn’t paid off —yet • Gillette’s businesses have been a drag for P&G • Sales growth projections have been under met • Most of Gillette ’s senior managers have left. • P&G ’s stock has lagged behind key competitors ’‚ including Colgate-Palmolive Co. and Unilever • Efforts to expand Gillette and Venus brands have not been too successful-fewer people shave since they’re unemployed or don’t go out as much • There have been more international success (Europe
Premium Stock Stock market Procter & Gamble
CONTENT 1. Introduction 1 2. Brief History and Strategic Challenges 1 3. PESTLE Analysis 3 4. Five Forces Analysis 4 5. SWOT Analysis 6 6. Generic Strategy 8 7. Recommendations 9 8. Conclusion 10 9. Bibliography 11 1.0 Introduction For the fiscal year of 2010‚ Procter & Gamble witnessed an increase on net sales by 3% to $78.9 billion and a 4% increase in unit volume (Deloitte‚ 2010). Under the unfavourable environment of global recession‚ P&G has successfully retained
Premium Marketing Brand Strategic management
beverages.[2] In 2014‚ P&G recorded $83.1 billion in sales. On 1 August 2014‚ P&G announced it was streamlining the company‚ dropping around 100 brands and concentrating on the remaining 80 brands‚ which produced 95 percent of the company ’s profits. A.G. Lafley‚ the company ’s chairman‚ president and CEO said the future P&G would be "a much simpler‚ much less complex company of leading brands that ’s easier to manage and operate." [3] P&G remains a highly selective employer as less than 1% of all applicants
Premium Procter & Gamble
My project will be based on the case studies of two of the world’s largest successful mergers / acquisitions. I will be comparing the cultural changes they gone through and how they successfully handled‚ managed the change. Brief over view of the two companies as follows: Exxon Mobil: ExxonMobil Chemical is a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation. It is incorporated in 1882. It is a global organization and is the world’s largest publicly traded international oil and gas company that focuses
Premium Procter & Gamble Standard Oil