Preview

You Decide: Laws 310 Week 3 Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
795 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
You Decide: Laws 310 Week 3 Essay Example
The (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer is seeking the sum of $1 million from the (Defendant) Bobby Bandleader, for alleged copyright abuse of the song “Happy Birthday to You”. The (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer is the copyright holder to the said song. The (Defendant) Bobby Bandleader is a Bistro owner who performs the song in an altered version (his own words are used) to his customers on their birthdays and have been doing so for the past twenty years without obtaining any licensing or permission from the copyright holder (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer.
Is the (Defendant) Bobby Bandleader committing copyright infringement, by singing the song to his customers? Should the (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer be paid royalties from the (Defendant) Bobby Bandleader, when he sang the song “Happy Birthday to You”, in his own reword/altered version?
The (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer stated that “I’m glad I finally found out what he’s been doing. I inherited the copyrights to the “Happy Birthday to You” song fair and square from my family and I want what’s coming to me”. The (Defendant) Bobby Band leader stated that, “... My version is better anyway. I harmonize it a little bit and use some different words. It’s not even the same song; it’s much better. People love to come to my bistro to celebrate their birthday because they love how well I sing the “Happy Birthday to You” song.”

From that statement, it appears that the (Defendant) Bobby Bandleader has created a song parody of the song “Happy Birthday to You”. According to the U.S. Copyrights Office, Section 107: Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use, “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or

phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As the technological age has approached and developed the definition of creativity has broadly expanded. The editing and reordering of a song or movie is the art of which we call remixing. Lawrence Lessig recognizes remixing as an accessible, forbidden art in his essay “Why Crush Them?” Unfortunately laws, such as copyright laws, infringe on the creators thought and ability to publicly make their name with this form of art.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    business answers cengage

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5-3. In this case, the parties’ conduct established that Wilchcombe gave LJESB and the other defendants a license to use his song. Lets remember that he created the song at Lil Jon’s request. Meaning that he knew that it would be used on LJESB’s album and that it would be widely distributed. Wilchcombe never indicated to any of the defendants that their use of the song would constitute copyright infringement. In othere words, we can say that the license constitutes a valid defense to to Wilchcombe’s claim of copyright infringement, and the defendants are entitled to a judgment in their favor on that claim.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iinet Case Decision

    • 3401 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Cowdroy J acknowledged the importance of the proceedings to the law of copyright in Australia, and…

    • 3401 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Williams Vs Gaye

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page

    Great choice of an example Lea. Something similar happened just in the past two years. Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke were sued by Marvin Gaye's family. The claim that Blurred Lines came from Gaye's song "Got to Give it Up". Gaye's family received $7.2 million after a ruling by seven jurors. This article on the lawsuit actually even mentions Michael Bolton's lawsuit as well. Gaye's family won the suit due to owning the rights to the sheet music of "Got to Give it Up" and with the help of some…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mattel Controversy

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The lawsuit filed by Mattel was dismissed by the lower courts, and this dismissal was upheld, though Mattel took their case up to the Supreme Court of the United States (Mattel's appeal was later rejected). In 2002, Judge Alex Kozinski ruled the song was protected as a parody under the trademark doctrine of nominative use and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. He also threw out the defamation lawsuit that Aqua's record company filed against Mattel. Kozinski concluded his ruling by saying, "The parties are advised to chill."[4][5] The case was dismissed, and in the process, it garnered lots…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1994,the case of Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc was decided in the Supreme Court. The members of music group 2 Live Crew were being sued for composing a parody song of Roy Orbisons song Oh, Pretty Woman. The rap group had asked permission from Acuff-Ross Music for a license of the tune of Roy Orbisons rock ballad for a song they wanted to create. Without permission from the company to use the tune, the rap group made and released the parody. After nearly a quarter of a million copies of the parody was sold, Acuff-Rose sued the rap group on the grounds of copyright infringement.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although DJ Earworm is using copyrighted material that is illegal to use in the opinion of most people, DJ Earworm deserves to be credited for his work regardless of copyright and should not be sued for his creation of art. To begin with, DJ Earworm has the same right as anyone to use these pieces of music even though they are under copyright. As he mentions in the article, DJ Earworm believes that he follows the “U.S. Principle of Fair Use”(Morse) ; therefor, allowing him to not be attacked by the copyright of the songs. As long as he doesn't benefit financially from these songs, which he does not, he shouldn't be sued for his works. Also, an alternative to use copyrighted material would be for Earworm to use music under the Creative Commons tag.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study: Troy Walker v Viacom International Inc., Nickelodeon Studios, Inc., Paramount Studios, Inc., and Stephen Hillenburg, the creator and Executive Producer of SpongeBob SquarePants. Troy Walker alleges that Stephen Hillenburg's series SpongeBob SquarePants (SBSP) infringes the copyright of Troy Walker's comic strip, “Mr. Bob Spongee ‘The Unemployed Sponge.’”. (Walker v. Viacom International, Inc., et., al Defendants, 2008)…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nba Vs Motorola

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The U.S. District Court disagreed because a state law claim can be preempted when: “i) the state law claim seeks to vindicate "legal or equitable rights that are equivalent" to one of the bundle of exclusive rights already protected by copyright law under 17 U.S.C. § 106 -- styled the "general scope requirement"; and (ii) the particular work to which the state law claim is being applied falls within the type of works protected by the Copyright Act under Sections 102 and 103 -- styled the "subject matter…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case for this week’s assignment, a number of performances were performed in Stockholm in 1969 by Jimi Hendrix and the Swedish broadcasting association made a recording of it and made a public broadcast of the event. In 1970 Hendrix died intestate and the later his entire estate was transferred to Experience Hendrix several years later There was no private law rights and remedies for exploitation at the time of these performance in Sweden relating to live performance, [ ] Retrospective rights are conferred by the CPDA and does also confer such rights to countries that may have qualified for it and at that time Sweden was not as it only became a member in 1985. Purple Haze Record Ltd being defendants in this case[ ] had recoded the performance and sold copies of them in the UK. Their (claimant’s) arguments in this case relied on section 182A and 182B of the CPDA[ ]and they claim that the performances could qualify and their rights had been infringed. The defendants disagreed on their claim that the claimants were depending of the court’s interpretation of the CPDA which approach backs the fact that Sweden was not a qualifying country at the time the performance took place.[ ]…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, copyright infringement has become a big controversial issue in the society. In the late 1980’s, Negativland sampled a part of U2’s song, “I still haven’t found what I’m looking for”, into its own music. They also used the letter “U” and number “2” in their name of the album cover. U2’s record label, Island Record, believed that Negativland was stealing U2’s rhythm because Negativland never asked for permission to use their song. However, Negativland’s record label, SST records, claimed that they have the freedom of expression, and that it’s new music they’ve created to publish. In a similar case, Danger Mouse mixed the vocal from Jay-Z’s The Black Album and the beats from the Beatles’ The White Album to create The Grey Album. As a result, the original artists sued Danger Mouse and all of Grey Album was forfeited. Some people think…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cases went to the Supreme Court, where both sides were allowed to present their argument. Judge Sotomayer and Robert were both active in asking questions. , while Justice Thomas stayed quiet . The Supreme Court 4-3 outcome was that U.S Office of Trademark was unconstitutional in denying Tam and his band members the name slant. Justice Robert wrote the opinion where he stated that while the words may be offensive, the trademark was not a government entity but a public entity involving citizens. He further goes on to highlight the differences between political speech and commercial speech the latter of which is held to a lower standard of constitutional review (Lee vs Tam,…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2) From what the case describes, the overall guiding policy of Song seems to be an…

    • 1613 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Essay

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law is a set of behavioural norms that are set in place by a ruling class to adjust the behaviour of humans when attempting to develop society to a certain stage. This can ultimately be discussed as the essence of law. These behavioural norms can be found in the majority of societies in today’s modern age, and is a huge influence on how the majority of people go about their daily lives. Although these particular sets of behavioural norms are written to benefit the ruled society, it can be debated who may be the best party to effect, change or implement these laws, and can be argued between the courts or professional politicians who may be fitter to make radical legal changes or decisions.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law and Society Essay

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For women in the 19th century, marriage was a binding contract that required them to sign their life away to the man that they loved. They lost all of the rights to their property, their income, and basically their independence. Women were expected to keep the household tidy and running smoothly, as well as earn some type of living that didn’t require much of leaving the house. Women were also expected to present their husbands with everything they needed, and wanted, in a timely matter and without complaint. They had virtually no voice. Men were only expected to provide their wife with the necessities of life, and to protect her. This system or way of functioning was called “coverture”.…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays