Preview

Us History Regents

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Us History Regents
1) Which idea is illustrated by the Supreme Court cases Schenck v. United States and Korematsu v . United States?
1. The free speech rights of Communists have often been violated.
2. During wartime, limitations on civil rights have been upheld by judicial action.
3. The rights of protestors have been preserved even in times of national stress.
4. Economic interests of foreign nations are frequently upheld in United States courts.
2) The Dred Scott decision on the issue of slavery upheld the Southern viewpoint that
1. the power of the Supreme Court does not extend to cases of race
2. Congress could not pass a law depriving territorial residents of their property
3. a national vote should be held to decide the legality of slavery
4. the economic well-being of the western states depended on slave labor
3) The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Escobedo v. Illinois all advanced the
1. voting rights of minorities
2. guarantees of free speech and press
3. principle of separation of church and state
4. rights of accused persons
4) An immediate result of the Supreme Court decision in Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935) and United States v. Butler (1936) was that
1. some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
2. State governments took over relief agencies
3. Congress was forced to abandon efforts to improve the economy
4. the constitutional authority of the President was greatly expanded
5) Under Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Supreme Court was considered "activist" because of its
1. reluctance to overturn state laws
2. insistence on restricting freedom of speech to spoken words
3. expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
4. refusal to reconsider the issues of the Plessy v. Ferguson case
6) The "clear and present danger" ruling of the Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States illustrates the continuing conflict between
1. free speech and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Worcester vs Georgia

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Chief Justice Marshall sided with Cherokees and stated that laws were “repugnant to Constitution, laws, and treaties of the US”…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Muller vs. Oregon was a landmark court case that took place in 1908. The major issue…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi Vs Rumsfeld Summary

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Cyr, which questioned the district court?s jurisdiction under the general habeas corpus statute when dealing with illegal immigration and anti-terrorist groups. Zadvydas v. Davis, asking whether the Attorney General has the authority to arrest a removable alien after the removal period or not. Matthews vs Eldridge, dealing with an inevidentary hearing to a disabilities beneficiary being terminated violating the Due Process of the Fifth Amendment (Cornell Law, 2004).…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Student Name ______________________________________________________________ School Name _______________________________________________________________ The possession or use of any communications device is strictly prohibited when taking this examination. If you have or use any communications device, no matter how briefly, your examination will be invalidated and no score will be calculated for you. Print your name and the name of your school on the lines above. A separate answer sheet for Part I has been provided to you. Follow the instructions from the proctor for completing the student information on your answer sheet. Then fill in the heading of each page of your essay booklet. This examination has three parts. You are to answer all questions in all parts. Use black or dark-blue ink to write your answers to Parts II, III A, and III B. Part I contains 50 multiple-choice questions. Record your answers to these questions as directed on the answer sheet. Part II contains one thematic essay question. Write your answer to this question in the essay booklet, beginning on page 1. Part III is based on several documents: Part III A contains the documents. When you reach this part of the test, enter your name and the name of your school on the first page of this section. Each document is followed by one or more questions. Write your answer to each question in this examination booklet on the lines following that question. Part III B contains one essay question based on the documents. Write your answer to this question in the essay booklet, beginning on page 7. When you have completed the examination, you must sign the declaration printed at the end of the answer sheet, indicating that you had no unlawful knowledge of the questions or answers prior to the…

    • 7115 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision of 1857 is one of the most famous Supreme Court decisions because it declared that slaves could never become citizens of the United States. The Court’s 6-3 decision stated that the Constitution could not protect blacks and “blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” Since slaves could never become citizens they had no right to sue and Dred Scott remained a slave. The courts reputation following this decision plummeted to an all time low in the North and now Republicans of the time viewed the court as controlled by the Slave Power.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper I’m going to detail the judicial process of a Supreme Court case, which was the first of its kind. The Supreme Court did not have original jurisdiction over this case. It traveled through each juridical system before reaching the Supreme Court. This case was of interest to them, not to question it the defendant was guilty, but were his constitutional rights violated in the process of prosecuting him. This case began with an anonymous tip that the defendant was growing illegal contraband at his home. The DEA assigned Detective Padraja and Detective Bartelt to sit on the home. After making the decision that no one was home the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mіrаndа vs. Arizona was а case that consіdеrеd the rights of the dеfеndаnts in criminal cases in regards to the power of the government. Indіvіduаl rights did not change with the Mіrаndа decision; however it created new constitutional guidelines for law enforcement, attorneys, and the courts. The guidelines ensure that the individual rights of the fifth, sixth and the fourteenth amendment are protected. This decision requires that unless а suspect in custody has been informed of his constitutional rights before questioning anything he says may not be introduced in а court of law (Mіrаndа v. Arizona, 1966). The decision requires law enforcement officers to follow а code of conduct when arresting suspects. After an arrest is made, before they may begin questioning they must first advise the suspect of their rights, and make sure that the suspect understands them.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1960’s was an evolution of change in American history. When Earl Warren became Chief Justice of Supreme Court in 1953 it made the most dramatic changes and held a far more liberal view than any other Supreme Court before. Some of its most important rulings were on African-American civil liberties. The Supreme Court changed American law on segregation in schools, criminal procedure, and privacy rights. Before the Warren Court the American law treated blacks as second class citizens, and by the end of Justice Warren's term racial equality was inevitable.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately the court claimed that they could not take the case because they could only hear cases from certain groups for a specific set of claims and that based off of the constitution-…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    True Or False Analysis

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6a. The United States Supreme Court (S.Ct.) heard the case of Metro-Goldwyn Mayer v. Grokster (see p. 7-8 of your text). What courts heard the case before it reached the S. Ct.?…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. History Course

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Advanced Placement program in United States History (APUSH) is designed to provide students with the analytical skills and factual knowledge comparable with a two-semester introductory college course. As such, it is not a college prep course; it is the real thing. In order to deal critically with the challenges of APUSH, students will evaluate a variety of historical materials, including text, primary resources, scholarly articles, historical novels, and the like. Students will read a minimum of 60 pages per week and should expect to spend two hours working outside of class for each hour in class. Students will take notes from printed materials and lectures, write article reviews and essays, take quizzes, take tests in objective and essay format, and prepare team presentations. This class is rigorous and demands a yearlong commitment presently unknown to high school students. It is imperative that assignments are completed on time; once behind, it is difficult to catch up.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foreword: on American Exceptionalism; Symposium on Treaties, Enforcement, and U.S. Sovereignty, Stanford Law Review, May 1, 2003, Pg. 1479…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays