Preview

To what extent

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1508 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent
To what extent was Austria responsible for the failure of the Italian revolutionaries in the years 1820-1849?

Austria played an integral part for the failure of Italian revolutionaries in between the years 1820-1849, due to their incredible influence throughout Europe at that time, being known as a superpower. Their military strength shone through, and crushed every revolution between 1820 and 1849. However, they are not the sole reason for failure. There are also other important factors that contributed to the failure of Italian revolutionaries, such as the lack of communication between leaders, and lack of foreign support.

Austria was responsible for the failure of the Italian revolutionaries due to two main reasons: their strict Chancellor Metternich, and the strength and efficiency of their army.

Austria was responsible for the failures of the Italian revolutionaries due to the influence of their chancellor, Metternich. The impact of Austria in Italy was felt before the first revolution in 1820. Due to the defeat of Napoleon in the Battle of Waterloo, 1815, the Holy Alliance (containing Prussia, Russia and Austria) ensured that France’s power was severely limited. In order to do this, land from Italy was distributed to Austria, as a way of enticing Austria to protect Italy from French expansion. The lands of Lombardy and Venetia came under the influence of the Austrians, due to the Congress of Vienna. The Austrian Chancellor Metternich, was therefore alarmed when he heard of revolutions occurring in Italy, as it made him think that the three states: Naples, Sicily and the Papal states, were challenging his authority, and this would have an impact on Austria, as it would have reduced trade between the two countries. Metternich explicitly states that “Italian affairs do not exist”, scorning the idea of a united Italy. When the revolution of Naples was successful, Metternich rapidly called together the Great Powers of Europe, and managed to convince

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Congress of Vienna, held after Napoleon's exile to Elba, aimed to sort out problems in Europe. Delegates from Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia (the winning allies) decided upon a new Europe that left both Germany and Italy as divided states. Strong nationalist elements led to the re-unification of Italy in 1861 and Germany in 1871. The settlement at the end of the Franco-Prussian war left France angry at the loss of Alsace-Lorraine to Germany and keen to regain their lost territory. Large areas of both Austria-Hungary and Serbia were home to differing nationalist groups, all of who wanted freedom from the states in which they lived.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Britain and Italy’s relationship was cordial before the Abyssinian crisis, indicating success in their appeasement policies. The Stresa front of 1935 between: Britain, France and Italy manifested this, as they agreed to prevent further revision of the treaty from Hitler and to resist him in his expansionist aims, and to also condemn Hitler’s actions. The Stresa front was suggested by Mussolini himself who was very co-operative and acted on the side of Britain and France as they all shared the same opinion on German rearmament. This showed how prepared Mussolini was to take action and stand against German aggression, as Mussolini was the only one who actually sent troops, during the Austrian Putsch of 1934, when the Nazi’s attempted to exploit Austria’s condition by trying to take over and employ a Nazi government. Italy was the only country who was prepared to take stance that was not mere condemnation but an actual military reaction, these clearly suggested Mussolini strong feelings in regards to Hitler. This found great success as they all agreed to it and this manifested Britain’s success in appeasement policies.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Austria and Russia are enemies, Russia and Britain pull back from continental affairs, leaving Austria without powerful friends.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assessments chapter 9

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. How did the lack of a single strong ruler benefit Italy during the Renaissance?…

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria's attempts to suppress uprising in Italy in areas that Austria controls initially had to deal with the French forces supporting the uprisings.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revolutions broke out in Italy in January making it the first revolt of this historic year. The Italian peninsula was made up of many smaller states and hadn’t yet been unified into one country. Revolutionaries demanded freedom from foreign powers, unification of the peninsula, and the creation of a constitutional government which provided more civil liberties to the people. The leaders of several Italian states such as Sicily, Piedmont, and Tuscany along with Pope Pius IX granted the creation of constitutions for…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1796, a French leader named Napoleon Bonaparte lead his army to attack Italy. Napoleon was an innovator and an opportunist. Although Napoleon had his own reasons for taking over Northern Italy, France mainly wanted Italy for financial and strategic reasons. At this time, Austria owned a portion of Italy, but France wanted to keep this land from them because “it was an ideal outpost for defense and offense” (Sarti 19). Only a few months into Napoleon’s rule, he had changed the political landscape of Italy which had been in place for years. After the Jacobins took power in Genoa in the north and the Roman Republic replaced papal rule in Rome, the Parthenopean Republic replaced the royal court, who escaped to…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War 1 Dbq

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife ( Austria-Hungry president ). That maybe the alliance,…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This however fell short of its reality as it required a level of enthusiasm in its peoples. The PNF however, failed to bring about this in reality. This is as the Fascist Party failed to establish the link between Italian people and Fascism through both its organisation and propaganda. The failures within Italy’s fascist regime can often be linked to the idea that they were trying to replicate Hitler’s Germany. Their fascination with his regime especially towards the treatment of the Jews did not go unnoticed.…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    based in Rome, losing influence over much of Northern Europe. Weakened, the various Italian city-states became vulnerable to conquest by Spain, France, and Austria. Italy remained a patchwork of principalities controlled through proxy by various European powers until the 19th century, when the French leader Napoleon supported the unification of Italy as a way of creating a buffer state against his many enemies. With the backing of France, Italian nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi led a popular movement that took over much of Italy in 1861 and would be ending in 1870 with the fall of Rome and complete unification of the…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both German fascism, led by Adolf Hitler and Italian fascism, led by Benito Mussolini exploited many economical and political difficulties within their nation in order to gain power. Hitler blamed Germany's ruined economy on the Weimar Republic, Communists, and Jews, while Mussolini blamed large Socialist and Catholic parties for Italy's economic struggles. They also gained the support of farmers, small businessmen, civil servants, and young people by advocating strict nationalistic goals and blaming their economic troubles on the Bolsheviks. Nevertheless, the most crucial components of securing political power was though…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was barely powerful enough to be counted as a great power. Its parliamentary system was corrupt and inefficient. Its industrial progress was slow. But Italy had great territorial ambitions. Italy wanted Tunis and Tripoli in northern Africa. This brought Italy into conflicts with France because Tunis was adjacent to the French colony, Algeria, and was long regarded by France as French sphere of influence. Italy also wanted Italia Irredenta-Trieste, Trentio and Tyrol. Although the majority of the people in these places were Italians, they were kept under the rule of the Dual Monarchy. Thus Italy came into serious conflicts with…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The revolution saw that the monarch be overthrown and feudalism abolished in the interests of the majority. Surrounding countries mainly Prussia, Austria and later Britain who were ruled by absolute monarchies viewed the uprising as a threat to their power and intervened with the use of military force. It was not only foreign powers to oppose the revolution, but also the clergy, nobility and others who had benefited from feudalism.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Long-term government financial chaos played a lead role in the cause of the French Revolution. This point is supported by William Doyle, in Origins of the French Revolution. Government debt and lack of available funding seriously deteriorated authority and credit, leading to extreme measures in taxation, thereby acting as a catalyst of the French Revolution.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays