Preview

Rousseau and Private Property Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1440 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rousseau and Private Property Essay Example
Jessica Trinh
Essay #1
LBST 301
2 March 2006
Rousseau's View of Private Property
Land and private ownership has been the reason for many wars and debates throughout history. There are various people whom believe that land should be used as private property, Rousseau, Jefferson, and Smith, and others whom believe land should only have public use, Marx and Engels. Rousseau believes that land should be used for private property and that it is necessary within the social contract to demonstrate the status of citizenship.
Rousseau's The Origin of Civil Society describes how horrendous life would be if we were in a state of nature because of the brutish lifestyle that we would have to endure. In the civil state we have given up many of our freedoms that we would have in the state of nature to ensure that we live a peaceful and civilized manner. He believes that an aspect of the civil state would then include ownership of private property. He states, "All men have a natural right to what is necessary to them" (70). It is apparent then that he means that in the civil state all men have the right to own private property because of the necessity man has for land. He understands that the right of private property would then entail that they would have to follow the rule of "first occupancy" (70). Rousseau understands the flaw of weakness in this idea of "first occupancy," (70) but he supports this idea by stating, "First occupancy [...] is guaranteed to every man enjoying the status of citizen" (70). If the right of private property is given to man by a mutual understanding then it is obvious that private property if essential to mankind and its citizenship.
His most important idea of his civil society is that ''as owners they are trustees for the common wealth. Their rights are respected/by their fellow citizens and are maintained by the united strength of the community [.. .]" (71). In this quote Rousseau is stating that private property allows the owners to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his 1755 discourse on 'The Origins of Inequality', Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues his conception of the natural state of mankind, and its subsequent corruption throughout the progress towards civil society. Whilst Rousseau's idealism can be targeted as unrealistic, and his criticisms of the state potentially destabilising to certain societies, ultimately he makes a valid philosophical argument against tyranny which helps found republican political values.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Jean-Jacques Rousseau 's “the Origin of Civil Society, Rousseau presents Ideas that, in his society, were considered very radical. He points out that a Society was in a natural state and that when we were that we were born free, and when we subject ourselves to a king, he must hold up certain rights and protect them, and in return they give him power, what Rosseau called the “Social Contract” . Thomas jefferson 's “Declaration of Independence” is Dirrived from Rousseau 's text about “rights” and “the Social Contract.” The ideas that Rousseau has written about are greatly applied to the ideas that Thomas…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in his Social Contract, argued that in every country the sovereign voice of government…

    • 3293 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson sees to Rousseau in justifying colonial claims to independence. Jefferson writes, "Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it…" (Jefferson 80). This reflects Rousseau's thinking that, [the only foundation left for legitimate authority in human societies is Agreement] (Rousseau 61). Rousseau argues that all society exists because…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After explaining how the state of nature evolved into civil society when people began to rely on each other for resources, Rousseau concluded that the social contact that made civil society possible is more important that the individuals who created it. Although civil society created inequality, it also created freedom, morality, and rationality, which make people human. On the other hand, Locke explained that the state of nature evolved into civil society because people wanted to protect their property and liberties. He concluded that civil society exists to benefit the people; if the present government fails to do so it should be overthrown.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Second Treatise, Locke states that the world is given “to mankind in common” by God, yet his argument is for the right of private property with the justifications of: the property must be designated for the property to be useful, those who labor for the property own it through their labor, and any man can take as much property as he wants as long as the property is used and not spoiled.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He also thinks citizens should have the right to revolt and government should always give and protect our rights. However, the Enlightenment thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau, feels we protect our own rights by working together. In class we discussed how his belief is similar to the phrase: If we all have superpowers the no one has superpowers. We considered this phrase because if everyone were to have superpowers, then we wouldn't wish to have them anymore since everyone has them. Rousseau also stated we must use reason to give the individual rights of life, liberty, and property. Locke shows his views on liberty by inferring one should have the ability to choose who governs them, as well as having their freedom of religion protected. Rousseau expresses his conception toward liberty by explaining whatever the majority of the people want should become law and rules should be strictly enforced if the people are in…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke claims that in the state of nature, the common is of no use, which means a tree is just a tree until you cut it down, use the wood to build a house or fire. Everything that was naturally grown and given on earth is worthless until mankind puts value on them. The world is waiting to be claimed and Locke says that private property begins when we remove it from the state of nature claiming it through labor. “The labour that was mine, removing them out of that common state they were in, hath fixed my property in them” (§ 28 pp.20). At first, it was the common right for anyone to fish anything from the ocean, but the act of actually removing the fish from this common state that nature has left it in, made it private property.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His theories severely degrade philosophies regarding divine right and emphasize natural as well as manual labor. In Émile, Rousseau makes this quite clear by stating that of all the trades "which can furnish substance to man, that which most nearly approaches to the state nature is manual labor...do not work from necessity, work for glory. Lower yourself to the splendor of the artisan in order to be above your own" (Rousseau 232-233). Although his beliefs regarding the government 's role in society could be considered by some as oppressive or totalitarian, Rousseau 's writings played an incredibly important role in Europe 's individual rights…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Rousseau

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rousseau and Locke both provide arguments for how they would protect their citizen’s liberty and equality. However, Rousseau’s society was more likely to protect their liberty and equality by establishing a political order, that was the Sovereign and the social contract. The Sovereign, looked over the general population and ensured that all the laws that were passed were for the general good, and the social contract would ensure that the Sovereign would not abuse their power for their own good. Locke, however, had the same idea except rather than having a social contract keeping checks on everyone, the legislative and executive branch would keep each other in check. Having people keep each other in check instead of relying on a social contract would be a more efficient way to ensure that one group could not abuse their power. Overall, however, Rousseau proposed a strategy that would protect the people’s liberty and…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These new skills and techniques allowed for the development of housing, which led humans to become domicile. This then permitted the formation of the family unit, leading to the first concepts of private property. This leads into another important difference in the philosophers: that unlike Hobbes and Locke, Rousseau believes that there is a natural inequality between people in the State of Nature. Some people are simply better suited for their environment and are able to accumulate resources and possessions more proficiently. This led to a respect between people for private property in the State of Nature (Discourse). However, this beginning of the concept of private property also led to the beginning of industry, and the beginning of industry led to materialism, which Rousseau believes is the process of burdening ourselves by seeking things that we do not…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau explains the philosophical underpinnings of the social contract as well as its suitable form. The suitable form is the ‘sovereign’ which according to Rousseau is the collective description the people who mutually agree to enter into a civil society. The individuals may have different needs and opinions, but the sovereign, as a product of the social contract, expresses the common will and good for the entire…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Declaration of Independence,” written by Thomas Jefferson, is a statement adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776. “The Origin of Civil Society” is an article written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Jefferson writes about human rights because all men shall be equal and free; Rousseau writes about social contracts because by understanding the concepts of social contracts, the people will live with better security and significance. By analyzing these two articles, readers can see how important it is for a writer to understand the concepts from previous generation of writers, how much Rousseau’s ideas have influenced Jefferson’s statement, and how Jefferson has expanded Rousseau’s concepts.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays