Preview

Quotes from Henrey David Thoreau, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King Jr. Pertaining to Civil Disobedience Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Quotes from Henrey David Thoreau, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King Jr. Pertaining to Civil Disobedience Essay Example
Quotes that answer specific questions:

What is civil disobedience?

All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now. But such was the case, they think, in the Revolution of '75. If one were to tell me that this was a bad government because it taxed certain foreign commodities brought to its ports, it is most probable that I should not make an ado about it, for I can do without them. All machines have their friction; and possibly this does enough good to counter-balance the evil. At any rate, it is a great evil to make a stir about it. But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us not have such a machine any longer. In other words, when a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law, I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize. What makes this duty the more urgent is that fact that the country so overrun is not our own, but ours is the invading army. (Henry David Thoreau)

In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive, negotiation, self-purification, and direct action. (Martin Luther King Jr.)

You may well ask, ‘Why direct action, why sit-ins, marches, and so forth? Isn't negotiation a better path?’ You are exactly right in your call for negotiation. Indeed, this is the purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has consistently refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. I just referred

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to him, nonviolent movement stands in the middle of “the force of complacency”, which dedicated to a passive agreement to the existing unjust racial segregation, and “the force of bitterness and hatred”, which sought to use extreme violence against the white and the racists (King). In addition, he further explains that complacency will result in political stagnation and a prolonged suffering of African Americans, while extreme violent protest will cause the South to “be flowing with floods of blood” (King). In other words, unlike the other two extreme options, nonviolent protest is a kind of rebellion that is full of love and compassion. It will not only prevent inhuman and brutal clashes between different groups, but also open the door for negotiation and changes. And more importantly, compared to violent protest, which involves injuries and even killings in order to achieve certain goals, nonviolent protest is able to achieve those goals at a minimal cost or…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay “Resistance to Civil Government,” Thoreau criticizes men who claim to oppose the Mexican-American war and refuse to fight, but “directly by their allegiance, and so indirectly by their money, furnished a substitute.” This statement demonstrates his belief that the government obtains its power through taxes, which are used to fund an unjust war. In the same way the withdrawal of vital institutions can devastate ISIS, the refusal to pay taxes would immobilize the government’s push for war because there would be no money to pay for…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Case Against Civil Disobedience the unknown author claims in his very first sentence that “the most striking characteristic of civil disobedience is its irrelevance to the problems of today” and that it is “the resort… exercised because the subject cannot or will not take up the rights and duties of the citizen.” What he fails to realize is that the rights and duties of a citizen is to keep an eye on the laws that rule the land and to revolt when those laws become unjust. It’s all part and parcel to the social contract thought up by Locke and heavily leaned upon by Thomas Jefferson. As Henry David Thoreau says in Civil Disobedience, “a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscious.” Civil disobedience can never become irrelevant because corruption will forever attempt to corrode even the best intentions of a government and so there will always be a need to revolt when unjust laws get pasted.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, “It may only takes 3.5% of the population to topple a dictator- with a civil resistance,” depicts that a nonviolent approach is more effect than a violent for civil movements. Because of nonviolence, it got voting rights for women, empower the labor movement, helped get Aids patients the care they needed, protected free speech, closed down several power plants, and changed systemic racism and black lives. Nonviolent movements are the quickest, safest, and cheapest way to change something. It is even recognized as a fundamental human right under the international law. The Women's March shows that people can really come together for defending their rights.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Big to Fail\

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The article “A Movement Too Big to Fail” by Chris Hedges with his criticism of “faux liberal reformers, whose abject failure to stand up for the rights of the poor and the working class, have signed on to this movement because they fear becoming irrelevant”(Hedges) to the reformers along with heads of financial leaders. Through non violent movements and protests against those who threaten the lower class wellbeing, that somehow they as a group gathering for the greater interests can show that others do exist and this is their way of saying that we as a whole united can make a difference and that we as Americans have that right to voice our opinions. It happened in the 1960’s, with the Vietnam war, nonviolent protesting made known that many people of the united states were against the war. Just like what we were doing in the 60s is no different from now, when the “union leaders pull down salaries five times that of their superiors”(Hedges).…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of nonviolent direct action is to create a situation in which a community is forced to face a problem and come to common ground with the opposition. This was showcased in Birmingham Alabama when the local civil rights groups and merchants negotiated to remove biased signs on windows and equal treatment in the stores. Through this nonviolent action the local civil rights groups thought they had won a moral victory over the merchants. However when the signs were only temporarily removed or just stayed in place the groups knew they needed a new set of tactics. This came through the course of nonviolent direct action. Nonviolent direct action has four steps, determine whether injustices exist, negotiation, self-purification, and…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout our history as a free society, countless nonviolent protests have arisen as a means to try to create change. Peaceful protest is not a new concept, even in America. Henry David Thoreau, a Transcendentalist writer in the 19th century, refused to pay taxes because he did not support the Mexican War. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau claims that so many men today blindly follow the government’s wishes and that “in most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense.” Peaceful protest is a way for men to “be men first, and subjects afterward,” expressing their opinions and acting as a catalyst for change in a free state. Without peaceful resistance, there would be little diversity of ideas; the government would control all policy without much regard to minority opinion, and scant progress would be made. Peaceful resistance is a means in which citizens are able to influence the laws and encourage progress. From Thoreau’s time to now, civil disobedience, to put it in Mr. Thoreau’s terms, has played a positive and necessary role in…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1968, close to 50 years ago, Martin Luther King, Jr. was killed by an assassin's bullet. He had given us a decade of nonviolent protest and civil disobedience during the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. While the idea of nonviolent protest was still relatively new, MLK hadn’t invented it; he had been one of a few who pioneered the idea and made it popular. The theory of civil disobedience can be traced back to an essay by Henry David Thoreau by the same name. This theory was adopted and popularized by Leo Tolstoy, Mahatma Gandhi, and eventually, Martin Luther King, Jr.. In “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau said that if a law “requires you to be the agent of injustice to another,” you should break that law, rather than be unjust to another person.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In King’s piece of writing, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” he writes about how a peaceful protest should be held and how it is most effective. He writes: “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action” (Martin Luther King Jr.). These four steps have been used, are being used, and are always going to be used. Even though Martin Luther King Jr. was not the first one to come up with non-violent protest, he was someone who made it work and he did in a big way. All of these four steps are critical in non-violent protest because without one of the steps the whole thing will fail. It is just like if a structure is built with one piece of the foundation missing the entire structure will most likely…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.” Martin emphasis that the people are left with no other alternative but to take direct action against their oppressors. Direct action incites confrontation without violence. Martin has a more deliberate tone when speaking of direct action, inferring that his actions are priority and needed to be rushed. Well staying purposeful, he makes it clear that “violent tension” is not something he supports but that “constructive non-violent tension which is necessary for…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some argue that civil disobedience represents a genuine cause, but reject the methods of direct action simply as disruptive, immoral, and an illegal standard to combat inequality. Civil disobedience is stigmatized to be corrupt and ineffective; however, I believe these labels do no justice to the cause the act of civil disobedience embodies. Unfortunately, the reality becomes a simple and cruel true: Justice prolonged is justice denied. Not everyone is granted the luxury of timely inalienable rights. Had it not been for those who protested and engaged in the Boston Tea Party how long would have the conversation or much less the American Revolution been delayed? Had it not been for Rosa Parks and the countless others who engaged in civil disobedience how long would it have been before society was desegregated at the choice of the oppressor? When one engages in peaceful civil disobedience, one is given the platform to address the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year is 1989, and there are people who want change. The yearly cost for AIDS/HIV treatment cost an average of $10,000 a year, which is way too far out of reach. AZT, the only AIDS treatment of that time was making people suffer, and making a fortune over their medication. September 14th, 1989, a small group of protesters who referred to themselves as “ACT UP” (AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power), stormed into Wall Street, handcuffed themselves to the VIP balcony, and held a sign reading “SELL WELLCOME”, telling the people of Wall Street to sell their Wellcome stock, which is the company that medically sponsors AZT’s overpriced drugs. Shortly after, AZT reduced the drug’s price to $6,400 a year, which was still too much. People might be thinking that this small group of protesters made a difference, and made a big change, but that is not the case. Yes, these protesters shined light on the issue, much more than there was before, but they were not the reason. The reason any small protest might “work” is for one reason: morals. Morales meaning the place at which a certain viewpoint is looked on in modern society. In context, small protests aren’t making the difference, but rather the common morals on the viewpoints that they are protesting for that really make the change.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation, self-purification and direct action. Socrates, a man hailed as one of the greatest philosophers of all time, and Doctor Martin Luther King, known to the world as one of the greatest public speakers and advocate of civil rights, both utilized nonviolent campaigns by voicing their opinions in intelligent ways and surrounding themselves with people who shared similar views.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Disobedience

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The voice of modern society can be heard through civil disobedience. People all around the world has encountered or even experienced protest against an issue in his or her own country. Throughout history and even today, it has been one of the only ways people can persuade the government to resolve a problem. Some of the key points that Henry David Thoreau states in On the Duty of Civil Disobedience are applicable to modern-day societies that people have the right to resist, should and must practice integrity, and attempt to attain a just, limited government.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rewinding almost 150 years, we turn towards a man who believes that civil disobedience is actually a necessity in society. Henry David Thoreau defended civil disobedience by stating it is a citizen's responsibility to act against a corrupt government. In his time, he protested vehemently against a greedy government who was seeking dominance. His refusal to pay a poll tax towards the Mexican-American War made him a criminal, but also a hero. Despite the repercussions, he refused to back down in the face of governmental power. From his defiance against the government, he wrote the essay "Civil…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays