Preview

Quiz answers / 100% correct Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1234 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Quiz answers / 100% correct Essay Example
http://www.homeworkmarket.com/content/quiz-answers-2

1. Which of the statements below best describes the concept of Enterprise Risk Management?

• Management of a single function of an organization that, upon implementation and testing, is then processed entity wide

• People, systems, and processes working together across the organizations to systematically thin about and manage a wide range of risks that could impede achieving organizational objectives/opportunity

• An approach that capitalizes on human intervention as processed through real change leaders

• A process affected by an entity’s leaders, management, and other personnel that is designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, and to manage risk

2. Diane bought an action figure for her son David from Terrence’s Toy Shop. The packaging did not mention that the toy contained small detachable parts. David accidentally swallowed and choked on one of the detachable parts and had to be taken to the hospital. On which of the following product liability charges can Diane sue Terrence’s Toy Shop for damages?

• Nuisance

• Misrepresentation

• Fraud

• Negligence

3. Making false statements about a competitor’s products, services, property, or business reputation could make a company liable for

• tort of appropriation

• intentional misrepresentation

• disparagement

• misappropriation of the right to publicity

4. A plaintiff wants to sue a defendant under the tort theory of negligence for his injuries, but the plaintiff knows he was partially at fault for his own injuries. Which of the following is true?

• A state whose law applies contributory negligence will not allow the plaintiff to recover if the plaintiff has any fault for his injuries

• If the plaintiff's fault is only 5 percent, his recovery will be the same under either pure or partial comparative negligence.

• The plaintiff will have to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most common types of product liability cases are based on the following types of defects:…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This group is considered powerful if it is not obliged to contend with other products for sale to…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samantha Smith Memo

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A: If the claimant is found to be more at fault than the defendant, the claimant will be barred from recovery.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LEG 100 Final Exam

    • 5282 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Question 4 5 out of 5 points Under the doctrine of ________, the plaintiff's negligence is an absolute bar to recovery against the defendant. Answer Selected Answer: Correct contributory negligence Answer: contributory negligence…

    • 5282 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bnad 302 Study Guide Ch5

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4. Management by objective (MBO) is a process that includes all of the following EXCEPT:…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 2 Quiz Essay Example

    • 721 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Question 3.3. Gillian is a college student who believes that whatever her professor states must be true because of who he is and what he does. Gillian is practicing _______________. (Points : 1)…

    • 721 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is a system of government in which members of the polity meet to discuss all policy decisions and then agree to abide by majority rule?…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be guilty of negligence, a defendant in a lawsuit must breach that duty of care, and the breach of duty must be the cause of harm to the plaintiff.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Memo PA110

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The plaintiff shall be barred from recovering damages if the trier of fact finds that the contributory fault on the part of the plaintiff is more than 50% of the proximate cause of the injury or damage for which recovery is sought.” Illinois State Statute 735 ILCS 5/2-1116(c) (2011). Thus we must provide proof that the plaintiff, Mr. King contributed at least 51% of the negligence.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Case Study

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages

    As, for the first time, demonstrated in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson , negligence may exist despite there being no direct relationship between two parties. After the Shaddock’s Case , the duty of care was extended to include the giving of information. In general, defendant will owe the plaintiff a duty of care if, at the time of making the statement, the defendant knows that:…

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence and Points

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    D. the facts of the case (5 points); There were no warning signs on tobacco products, Ohio supplier was liable for warn when he should have known the dangers of the product, and defendants were charged with breach of negligence for not displaying…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Explain the general differences between intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability. Additionally, explain the elements of intentional torts and negligence and provide working examples to illustrate each.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adam decided to play a practical joke on Linda, a co-worker. As Linda was leaving the office one night, Adam, wearing a mask, stepped out from behind some bushes. He pointed a handgun made out of licorice at her and demanded her purse. He then pushed the candy gun to her head and told her if she told anybody he'd kill her. Linda was very scared during the whole incident. She did not think it was funny when Adam pulled the mask off and took a bite out of the gun as he gave her the purse back. Did Adam commit the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress? a…

    • 2540 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays