Preview

Explain What Is Meant by the Doctrine of Parliamentary Legislative Supremacy and Discuss the Relevance of the Enactment of the European Communities Act 1972 and the Human Rights Act 1998. Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2199 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain What Is Meant by the Doctrine of Parliamentary Legislative Supremacy and Discuss the Relevance of the Enactment of the European Communities Act 1972 and the Human Rights Act 1998. Essay Example
The English legal system has existed for hundreds of years and it is made up of sources of law. The main sources of law include: Acts of Parliament/statue/legislation which is created by Parliament making Parliament the supreme law maker. The other main sources of law consist of: Delegated Legislation which is the Parliament Delegates, Common law and Case law which the courts apply, Equity which involves fairness rather than certainty, European Community Law and International Treaties. The International Treaties have been ratified by Parliament such as the European Convention on Human Rights has been implemented through the Human Rights Act 1998 consequently meaning the treaties have been put through domestic law.

The doctrine of Parliamentary Legislative Supremacy is a long-established concept with roots in constitutional law. The doctrine is the idea that Parliament, made up of the House of Commons and the House of Lords, is the sovereign power, supreme to all other bodies in its ability to legislate. The concept of the doctrine of legislative law making has been defined by the legal theory of Dicey as “Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatever” and that “no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament” (Dicey 1959). Again, this shows that parliament is the supreme law maker.

Parliamentary Supremacy states that no body, including the courts of law, has the right to override or set aside an Act of Parliament. From this, it means that nobody can achieve the following: alter parliament’s power, devolve the power of parliament to other bodies, give effect to international treaties, and surrender or limit its own power. (Alison Cronin). Parliament has the power to enact and revoke any new laws on any subject matter and the courts are unable to question the legitimacy of the law. (Macintyre 2001)

In addition, a Parliament cannot bind its successor meaning that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Parliament as a Law Maker

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Parliament is the supreme law making body consisting of all elected members of both houses. Its main role is to make laws, laws that not only protect society and individual rights but reflect the societies values. Parliament can be viewed as an arena for debate where new ideas for laws and proposed laws are discussed and debated on their purpose for an effective law to be delivered. Thus lessening the chance of an unjust law being created. However, parliament is not always effective when making laws as many factors can hinder the process of legislation within the two houses. However there are multiple strengths that far outweigh the weaknesses when determining parliament’s effectiveness.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TMA 1 W200

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are four main sources of law in England and Wales are legislation, judge-made law and European Union (EU) law and human rights law. This essay will look at the difference sources of English law (as highlighted above) and explain the relative importance of each source with particular reference to case law, and conclude whether the view articulated by your friend is correct.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The parliament makes laws in future. Which means they think ahead of what the world’s developing to and thinks of what new laws will be needed for society once this is done it allows society to know what the law is and how it will apply to them.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament does not govern, but its role is to check or constrain the government of the day. Many therefore argue that parliament’s most important function is to ‘call the government to account’’, there by forcing the members to explain their actions and justify their policies. There are three groups within the UK parliament, the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the Monarchy. The HoC consists of 646 MP’s and each MP is elected in a local constituency to gain a seat in parliament. The House of Lords consists of 721 peers, there are approximately 600 life peers where as there are only 92 hereditary peers. The Lords spiritual are the second smallest group of the Lords. They are bishops and archbishops of the Church of England, and now only 26 remain. Law lords are the final group to make up the House of Lords. There are only 12 of these, and they focus on judicial work, which is carried out through the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. The final group that can hold the government to account is the monarchy. The monarch is often ignored as part of parliament, which is understandable as the Queen is normally entirely ceremonial and symbolic. As a non-executive head of state, the monarchy symbolizes the authority of the crown. Parliament holds the government to account by scrutinising and overseeing what the government does, and this is the key to ensure a responsible government.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Upper House Case Study

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Re: Authority of Parliament in relation to the Upper House, [1980] 1 SCR 54, 1979…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Poop

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a parliamentary Democracy their core principle is parliamentary sovereignty, which means that parliamentary actions can not be over turned by any other branch...…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Legt1710

    • 25471 Words
    • 102 Pages

    The Law is a systematic set of rules to control conduct within a society, created by parliament and is enforced by courts.…

    • 25471 Words
    • 102 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One factor which can be argued to of had the biggest effect in terms of changing where parliamentary sovereignty resides in recent years is the EU. The UK initially joined the EC in 1973 since then the EC has become the EU and has also become increasingly more powerful over the UK as time has passed, the EU could even be argued to be supreme over UK statues and the UK parliament. This is shown in the factortame case in which EU law took precedent over UK wishes, allowing Spanish fishing boats to fish in UK waters, this was the first time UK law was scrutinized and removed by courts due to EU law contradicting these laws. Furthermore, being part of the EU ultimately is a way of binding the UK governments successors partly due to the fact that if the UK left the EU there could be major…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is the supreme law-making body in the UK. This means that there are no constitutional restrains on legislative powers. This also includes the fact that courts are under an obligation to give effect to legislation passed by Parliament and not question statutes. Most importantly, Parliamentary Sovereignty is not a constitutional relic. This is simply because UK courts cannot strike down Act of Parliament. First assertion of Dicey is that Parliament’s legislative competence is unlimited. This was shown in Mortensen v Peters (1906). In this case, it was held that parliament is supreme over international law and UK courts felt bound to apply the UK Act, even though it was in contravention of international law. Another case that illustrates…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Parliament Act 1911, the House of Lords enjoyed equal power with the Commons over legislation, with the exception of which by convention, recognized the supremacy of the House of Commons in relation to financial matters. However, in 1909, House of Lords rejected the Finance Bill which in breach of convention, resulting Parliament Act 1911 without the consent of the House of Lords. It replaced the Lord’s power to veto legislation by a power to delay it, except in the case of extending the life of Parliament requires the consent of both Houses.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is the supreme law-making body; it can make laws on all issues within its jurisdiction. However, the process of law-making can be slow. The courts, on the other hand, can change the law quickly if a relevant case is brought before them, they also can create precedent to be followed by other in the community in the future. Courts cannot change the law unless a relevant case is…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Parliament is the only body which can make laws in the United Kingdom (UK), and is therefore sovereign. No other authority can over-rule or change the laws which parliament has made. Political commentators often say that parliament can do "what the hell it likes" in terms of law making. This by and large means that the government of the day can pass legislation easily through parliament as long it has a strong, supportive majority in the House of Commons.’ So if, for example, Parliament had passed a law stating that all newborn boys had to be killed, or that all dog owners had to keep a cat as well, there might well be an enormous public outcry, but the law would still be valid and the court would, in theory at least, be obliged to uphold them. The reasoning behind this is that the Parliament, unlike the judiciary, is democratically elected, and therefore ought to have the upper hand when making the laws that every citizen has to live by.…

    • 3353 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays