Preview

Deontological vs. Teleological Ethical Systems Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deontological vs. Teleological Ethical Systems Essay Example
Deontological theories identify various duties and rights. Duties and obligations have been classified under several categories and they include duties to God, oneself and others. Those others include family, social and political duties. Basic rights including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are considered to be natural, universal, equal, and inalienable. The focus of deontological theories is on moral duties or obligations rather than on moral value or goodness. Intentions play a significant role in determining whether an act is ethical. (Ethics: Survey and Observations July 23, 2003) Consequentialist (teleological) theories determine ethical behavior by weighing the consequences of an action. The good and bad consequences of an action are tallied and if the total good consequences outweigh the total bad consequences, then the action are ethically proper. Therefore an action is ethical if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable with respect to some criteria. Criteria include affected groups and the dimension of time. Three criteria with respect to agents have been suggested. These criteria are Ethical egoism: only consequences to the entity performing the action are considered, Ethical altruism: only consequences to everyone except the agents performing the action are considered and Utilitarianism: the consequences to everyone of an act or rule are considered. (Ethics: Survey and Observations July 23, 2003)
The focus is on moral value or goodness rather than on moral duties or obligations. An action's consequences (what is good) are more important than on moral obligations (what is right). Human nature and experience determine what the good is. Social contract theory is a consequentialist theory in which morality is defined by a set of rules accepted by rational people for their mutual benefit. (Ethics: Survey and Observations July 23, 2003)

DEONTOLOGICAL THEORIES
1. The focus is on moral duties or what is right.
2.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Deontological ethical systems are associated with judgments that are based on an action. If the action is considered to be in a good intent, even with the possibilities of having negative consequences, then it is still defined as being good. Branches of deontological ethical systems can extend out to ethical formalism, religion, and natural law. Ethical formalism is defined as the motive and intent of a person has based on what action the person commits. An example I can recall from the recent news was a high school girl’s coach had a student confide in her that she was pregnant and did not want to tell her parents for fear of what the consequences would be. The high school coach then…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    HU4640 Project Part1

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper is going to discuss Ethics and Ethical Theories. It will include an introduction to ethical theories, virtue ethics, and care ethics. There will be sections discussing absolutism versus relativism, consequentialism versus deontological ethics, and lastly, free will versus determinism. It will also include a discussion about the study of morality and identify which of the approaches (Scientific, Philosophical, or Theological/Religious) are closest to my own personal beliefs. There will be a discussion regarding the three sources of ethics and what they are based on (Reason, Emotion, and Intuitionism).…

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2009 Afghanistan surge, the “bargaining paradigm”, defined by Allen , best reflects President Obama’s decision making process by which he used the ethical lens of “deontology”, discussed by Shaw , as the moral compass of his decisions.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are different systems in which an individual or a company could make ethical decisions. They can vary depending on the issue at hand and they relate and different in certain ways. In this writing I will compare the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. I will include a description of the differences in how each theory addresses ethics and morality. And I will give a personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are three main approaches to ethical theory. The three areas are utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Utilitarianism is often thought of as the consequences. In a utilitarian’s mind, the best choice is the one that is made to meet most people’s satisfaction and is ethically correct. The problem with utilitarianism is that as time passes and they begin to have wrong predictions, then the benefit is less for everyone and that person begins to look unethical. Also, there is the possibility for laws to conflict with a utilitarian’s way of thinking, at times they will infringe upon one person’s rights in order to benefit the greater population. Deontological theory states that people should follow their own obligations first and foremost ahead of other individuals or society. In this person’s thinking, they believe that following through with their own obligations is ethically correct. A deontologist has the thinking that they must follow the rules set, no matter the consequences. The biggest fault with a deontologist is that there is no logical basis for setting these rules. Since deontology is not based on specifics of different situations, there is no true guidance when there are conflicting obligations in any situation. Lastly, virtue ethical theory focuses mostly on the character of the person instead of the action that the person is committing. This theory takes into account a person’s morals, reputation and motivation for the act. The biggest fault with this sort of ethical theory is that a person’s change in morals is not considered.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth316 Week 1 Individual

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is not one single deontological theory but Kant is held as the standard by many. Deontological ethics judges morality based on one’s obedience to rules. Kant believed that nothing in the world could be good without qualification except good will, therefore, deontology suggest that all actions must be measured by their adherence to rules or duty and not the effects they produce.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing and contrasting ethical theories helps one to understand ones guidance system which helps or aides one through their decision making process. “Each theory emphasizes different points such as predicting the outcome and following one's duties to others in order to reach an ethically correct decision.” (2011) Each theory has a familiar thread with an end goal. In this paper each of the following three ethical theories utilitarianism, Virtue, and Deontological will be described relating to ethics and morality. Concluding with a personal experience with which the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to utilitarianism.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism favors a course of action that facilitates happiness. It can be considered as a form of consequential processes. According to this principle of classical ethical theory, utilitarianism refers to the moral value of an action though the determination of the resultant outcomes of the action. However, considerations should be placed on actual consequences, intended consequences and foreseen consequence. A classical study of this principle can be seen in the orders the military gives out or obeys (Arrigo, 2006). Utilitarianism principles have characteristics of reductionist and quantitative approaches to ethical issues, and it can be seen as a form of naturalism. Utilitarianism can be distinguished from deontological principles because deontology does not regard consequences as a determinant to moral value. Utilitarianism can also be distinguished from virtue ethics because virtue ethics emphasis on habits and acts that lead to happiness.…

    • 2731 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, in this paper I will discuss normative ethics and how people go about making hard decisions. I will explain to you what consequentialism and deontology are. I will also explain how our emotions play a role in our decisions to make consequentialist moral judgements and deontological moral judgements. Next, I will discuss how our emotions influence our decisions. Greene believe that we should not trust our deontological moral judgements. I agree with Greene and I will give examples and reasoning behind why I also do not think we should make deontological moral judgements.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good, bad, right, wrong…how do we know? Ethics is the study of how we determine what is right or wrong, good or bad (Mosser, 2010). While there are many ethical views, I focused on the three classical approaches for this paper. Utilitarianism states when given a choice between two acts, the one that creates the greater happiness for the greatest number of people is the ethical choice. Deontology stems from obligation or duty. This view takes the position that one has a duty to choose the right or moral act. Virtue ethics focus on the character of the individual rather than the act. If the individual has the proper balance of virtuous characteristics, they are ethical. While all three approaches have merit and all three have weaknesses, I believe that the deontological approach is the most convincing ethical view. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view and an opposing view and explain why I have chosen my position.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deontological theory contends that right and wrong are determined by the consequences of an action. Deontologists do not negate that consequences are significant but they believe there are more relevant aspects to the moral duty of the action. Deontology mainly focuses on Immanuel Kant and W.D. Ross. Kant based his view on moral principles that define between right and wrong. He also views deontology as an act on any maxim if and only if you can will it into a universal law. Kant introduces that there are rules to determine situations and he also shares that we should never treat people as means to ends. In this way, rational beings should always treat each other as ends in themselves, never as only means. Kant believed that humans have intrinsic worth and we should act to respect the mortality for us and others. He also believed that when humans recognize their worth, they cannot see themselves being used as entities to an end. Kant also shows the importance of not actually doing the right thing, but doing things for the sense of duty for getting moral worth in return. W.D. Ross developed the prima facia obligations. These obligations are obligations that override other obligations. According to Ross, there are seven types of obligations: 1. Duties of fidelity, 2. Duties of reparation, 3. Duties of gratitude, 4. Duties of justice, 5. Duties of beneficence, 6. Duties of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Virtue Theory

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In today’s world, ethics is a very big issue that involves many different views and beliefs. Ethics has become more prevalent with the general public in today’s business world. When it comes to ethics, there are three main theories. The first is the virtue theory which is all based around virtue ethics. This is sometimes simplified into being character based ethics. It states that “to be an effective person in the world one must adopt various characteristics and habits and characteristics that others would deem as praiseworthy” (Boylan, 2009). The next theory is the utilitarianism theory which is best described as the team first theory. Utilitarianism is a theory that suggests that “an action is morally right when that action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternative” (Boylan, 2009). The third theory is the deontological theory. Deontology is a “moral theory that emphasizes ones duty to do a particular action just because the action, itself, is inherently right and not through any other sort of calculations-such as the consequences of the actions” (Boylan, 2009). This is a basic overview of the three basic ethics theories that exist today.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism and deontology are two moral theories that can often pull us in different direction. Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons. This can be viewed as a contingent right. Contingent means something that could happen or come up depending on other occurrences. An example of a contingent right is the unexpected need for a bandage on a hike. The bandage is what the hiker needs and it will bring happiness to the person.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This theory decides where the goodness is in our consequences (280). This viewpoint contemplates the potential advantage or disadvantage that comes with the consequences. Humans decide whether the ends justify the means. Therefore, when weighing the consequences with the reason why one did something it's an example of the teleological theory. According to the deontological theory, morality is the act of carrying out obligations, it has nothing to do with the consequences. Through this outlook, maintaining a law or rule is something one must do to be morally right (281). The morality of a rule is impartial to whatever advantage it gave, it's decided by whether the rule was obeyed. For example, a man robs a bank and harms several people in the process to fund their child's life-saving operation. From the deontological stance, this action is morally wrong. Breaking into a bank is a federal offense also, harming and stealing from others is breaking two moral rules. Since this person broke the federal law and broke moral rules they are in the wrong, no matter how someone else benefits from this. The nobility of an action does not matter, only if an absolute moral rule was disobeyed…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays