Preview

A Man for All Seasons- Cromwell vs. More.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
334 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Man for All Seasons- Cromwell vs. More.
A Man For All Seasons The play, “A Man For All Seasons” written by Robert Bolt demonstrates many character personalities that contrast with others. Contrasting personalities are mainly portrayed through the two characters, Sir Thomas More, and Thomas Cromwell. Their different personalities cause their actions to further the play and the situations in the play. The two characters, Sir Thomas More, and Thomas Cromwell are depicted as smart, men. More is a kind man, who seems to put others before himself, and bites his tongue even when he has an opinion on a subject. This is demonstrated through his opinion on the king's divorce. Cromwell is portrayed as a serious, self-conceited man, whose actions only benefit himself. This is displayed in the scene when Cromwell is attempting to get information on Sir Thomas More from Steward. In order to receive the information Cromwell wants, he is willing to bride Steward with coins. This scene in a way foreshadows the rest of the play, because it shows how Cromwell is willing to get what he wants with a little manipulation. In the play, King Henry the VIII wants to divorce Queen Catherine because she did not produce him a son. Through these decisions, Sir Thomas More, and Thomas Cromwell's personal thoughts on the situation come out, and seem to contrast. As More is a good friend of King Henry the VIII, he believes that the Queen Catherine is still his wife and should not be divorced because she simply cannot produce an heir for the King. Thomas Cromwell's opinion varies greatly from More's. He believes that the King should divorce Catherine, because if the King were to pass away he would not have an heir to run England. More and Cromwell's characters contrast in the play, “A Man For All Seasons” by Robert Bolt. More is a compassionate person, while Cromwell is very self-conceited and seems to be the villain type character. These two elements will further the play, and it's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Allegory Man of the PeoplePlato utilizes The Allegory of the Cave in his writings The Public. It is a depiction of the nature of the education of man and the need for education in the society. Robert Bolt wrote the second play, The Man for All Season, and finally, the third writing, An Enemy of the People, is written by Henrik Ibsen. A comparison will also be made between the lead characters of the last two plays. The writer will compare Sir Thomas More from A Man for All Seasons with Dr. Thomas Stockmann, the lead character from An Enemy of the People. A comparison between the characters of the two men will reveal that Sir More is a greater man than Dr. Stockmann.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Claudio And Benedick Foil

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ever wonder why a character’s personality is completely different from another person in a book? These are known as foils because one of these characters brings out a personality of another one. In the book much ado about nothing by Shakespeare, this a comedy brings characters that are drastically different from each other, this essay focuses on Claudio and Benedick who are friends but are also very different from each other. These characters are different they bring out each other's reactions, feelings, and experience.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catherine, understandably, was opposed to be divorced from Henry and tried her upmost to prevent the marriage being ended. Henry believed it would be easy to get a divorce from his wife due to Wolsey’s contacts, as papal legate and cardinal. However when it became clear that Wolsey’s efforts weren’t materializing, growing pressure began to remove Wolsey from his position. Wolsey went to desperate measures to resolve the problem, even attempting to put Catherine in a nunnery. However when all of these attempts failed, it was a combination of this, the failure of the amicable grant along with other factors, such as Wolsey’s opposition at court that combined to caused Henry to dismiss him from his position as Lord…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    admission. The work I have chosen to compare this novel to is the classic play…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters, namely Richard III and Richmond, offer an insight into the contextual concerns of the Elizabethan period. Their values offer modern audiences the opportunity to identify contextual features because the values are a product of the context, as is the text itself. Richard III is the epitome of the villain. He values deceit, devilishness, power and a disconnection from God and family which is against everything the pious Elizabethans believed in and this is depicted through his actions and language “I am determined to prove a villain” (I.i.30). The emphasis on good vs. evil and wrong vs. right was of the utmost significance to audiences because it taught them moral lessons. These moral lessons were important to Elizabethans because religion was an overarching aspect of their cultural context. Shakespeare combined the idea of Richard being deformed together with these values to emphasise the insidious nature of his personality and in effect, contrast him against the heroic Richmond.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This male domination is shown in the play through Lord Capulet's relationships between his wife, daughter and other members of his family. This patriarchal domination makes him very powerful and makes other characters in the play weaker by comparison. This power is very important in determining the outcome of the play. The portrayal of Lord Capulet's character, shows him as one who has the power to tell others what to do as well as having complete power over his household and what happens in his household. He expects his wife (Lady Capulet), daughter (Juliet) and his servants to do exactly as he tells them.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Titus Andronicus Analysis

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many of William Shakespeare’s plays are so memorable because of the protagonists presented in them. Shakespeare delicately crafts (his) protagonists as complex characters that (evoke) different responses from the audience, often leaving the audience with a memorable impression of how they initially felt about the protagonist and how over time those feelings changed due to their experiences in life. Even after the play, the protagonist’s reactions to the events that took place in the play stay with us, because they make us question how we would have handled the situations that the protagonist was presented with. This exact feeling happens in two of Shakespeare’s early plays, Titus Andronicus and Hamlet. Both plays present two protagonists of…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    towards Richard were all different. For example, in the novel, Sir Thomas More's and later accounts of…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    More's Foil Character

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the play “A Man for All Seasons” by Robert Bolt the character Sir Thomas Mores characteristics are brought out by a couple of other characters in the play. Thomas More encounters characters in situations that really bring out the personality of Thomas More. One of these characters is Richard Rich. This character clearly helps the reader with understanding Thomas More better and better as they interact with each other in the play. This character contrasts from Thomas More by the way More believes his morals and his down fall at the end.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Interpretive Essay

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Man for All Seasons, by Robert Bolt illustrates the adult life of Sir Thomas More. In this play, the Common Man portrays man and his vices and sins showing the ordinary man of every age, class, culture, and society. Bolt uses the Common Man in the roles of the steward, boatman, and jailor to show how man can easily sin. Common Man exhibits man’s immorality through the roles of the steward, boatman, and jailor, in A Man for All Seasons.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this introduction to the play Stephan Greenblatt directly emphasises not only the depth but also the mystery about the main character of Hamlet. He points at the different impressions Hamlet makes on his co-characters and the spectator can only refer to these onstage interactions. A diverse character like Hamlet therefore leaves much space for interpretation.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>The two seem to have the same ideas on marriage even though we learn through the play that this is not true, they both know it is important to get married but have different viewpoints on the matter, they both appear to want their individuality. We can see this idea in the passage provided and many other parts of the play…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later on in the first play his character changes. He is presented as a disheartened, wretched man. This is shown in the line:…

    • 782 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel, many of the characters can be pointed out as crazy and disillusioned .As different characters are seen to be talking to themselves and show various sides of their characters, I chose King Lear as one who reveals to me the most surprising and unexpected in the scenes through soliloquies and monologues.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Points on Cromwell

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Historians have very different opinions about Cromwell. Some say he was a hypocrite and acted very much like the king he tried so hard to remove. Others see him as a great military leader and focus on his importance in increasing the power of parliament. They see the execution of Charles 1 as the first step towards democracy in Britain. Opinions at the time were just as divided.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays