Preview

A House Divided Speech Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A House Divided Speech Analysis
"A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand"
Abraham Lincoln June 17, 1858

MR. PRESIDENT AND GENTLEMEN OF THE CONVENTION: If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do, and how to do it. We are now far into the fifty year since a policy was initiated with the avowed object and confident promise of putting and end to slavery agitation. Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only not ceased, but has constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crises shall have been reached and passed. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new, North as well as South. Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Let any one who doubts carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination - piece of machinery, so to speak -- compounded of the Nebraska doctrine and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted; but also let him study the history of its construction, and trace, if he can, or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidences of design and concert of action among its chief architects, from the beginning. The new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State constitutions, and from most of the national territory by congressional prohibition. Four days later commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that congressional prohibition.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    I have no purpose, directly or -Antithesis indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no -Parallelism lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. Those who nominated and elected me did so with full knowledge that I had made this and many similar declarations and had never recanted them; and more than this, they placed in the…

    • 5601 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the 1760s to the 1860s opposition to slavery grew and morphed, culminating in the outbreak of the American Civil War. The writing of the Three-Fifths Clause, in 1787 (Source 1) reveals how, from the birth of the Union, the issue of slavery forced sides to come to uneasy compromises. Slavery at this time was purely a political and economic issue. Throughout the 100 years however, the opposition to slavery evolved. The formation the single issue party, The Free Soil party, in 1848, symbolised a shift towards a moral opposition to slavery. Although the Free Soil Party had an economic incentive to push for the abolition of slavery, they also argued that free men on free soil offered a morally superior system to slavery. Magee depicts the multifaceted…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Why does Lincoln in the “House Divided” speech believe the pro-slavery side was winning regarding the expansion of slavery in the territories? Why does Calhoun in opposing the Compromise of 1850 think the South was at a disadvantage? Because starting the new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State Constitutions, and from most of the National territory by Congressional prohibition. Four days later, commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition. This opened all the National territory to slavery, and was the first point gained…… Although each side received benefits, the north seemed to gain the most. The North had absolute control over the government. The South…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion stated that because of Dred Scott’s race he was not a citizen and had no right to sue under the Constitution, in March of 1857. Stretching beyond the case of the moment, the court’s decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that had for nearly 40 years placed restrictions on slavery north of the parallel 36 degrees, 30 minutes, in the vast territory of the Louisiana Purchase. Scott’s abolitionist lawyers might have hoped for a landmark decision but not the one they got. The Supreme Court’s ruling galvanized the abolition movement and spurred Abraham Lincoln to publicly speak out against it, the event that led to the resurgence of his personal political career.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “In 1857, the highest court in the United States held that blacks in America possessed no rights, could never become citizens of the United States, and that Congress was powerless to abolish slavery.” (Kaczorowski, p. 45) Was this true? Could slavery really never be abolished? In his article “To Begin the Nation Anew: Congress, Citizenship, and Civil Rights after the Civil War”, Robert J. Kaczorowski shows the process of the abolishing of slavery in the United States. Kaczorowski discussed the reactions of the Republicans, Democrats, and the Federal Judges on the major political issues of the Civil War, specifically: slavery, civil rights, and who had authority to enforce a solution? While providing information on these topics, he describes the different roles of 13th Amendment, 14th Amendment, and the Civil Rights Bill of 1866, some of the many decisions that helped form an exceptional nation.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown's Raid DBQ

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many different views and ideas about John Brown flew around the North before the Civil War. Debates and arguments sprung up about whether Brown’s actions and means could or should be justified. Some agreed only partially with Brown. Document A proves that with Horace Greeley’s statement “And, while we heartily wish every slave in the world would run away from his master tomorrow and never be retaken, we should not feel justified in entering a slave state to incite them to do so, even if we were sure to succeed in the enterprise.” Greeley is merely saying that he approves of Browns means but not his violent way of going about accomplishing those means.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talks about the significance and background of the Dred Scott case. In fact this actually hurt the cause of anti-slavery because now, slavery could spread into the free states. Now, the free states laws that used to create this safe haven for the fugitive slaves, now no longer have any power because the Constitution, debatably the strongest document the United States has, contradicts any law protecting slaves. This is because the United States Constitution protects all property of the individual, and slaves to the southern people in the 1850’s thought of slaves as property.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    What poses antagonism, are arguments over whether that decision was just, fair, or moral. In the mindful opinion of this writer, the legal conclusion was completely unethical. Abraham Lincoln delivered a series of oppositional speeches and declarations after the fact. Dyer’s article assigns a commentary which discusses how certain modern scholars try and paint Lincoln’s sentiment another way, against what he truly felt about the situation, and his true moral disgust. Dyer emphasizes that Lincoln had a huge respect for the law, and legal principles based upon natural law, truth, and fairness.9 Dyer states of Lincoln’s love of the law, prior to Dred Scott, as “A younger Lincoln had taught that respect for law – even bad law – was the central doctrine in American civil religion…In a his famous Lyceum Speech in 1838, Lincoln declared, ‘Let ever American, every lover of liberty,”10 never violate the country’s laws. But even then, prior to Dred Scott in that same speech, Lincoln distinguishes that some laws are so badly legislated and need immediate repeal. The national debate, after the dust of the Dred Scott decision had dispersed, centered upon “the territorial question of slavery.”11 Thus, proving judicial authority can falter, in terms of ethics and legal balance, the Dred Scott Decision remains a hot topic among historians and…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Section I: Calhoun’s Oregon Bill Speech: A Denunciation of Natural Law in Defense of Slavery…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With drama now rumbling in the American underbellies, the small weight of anything slightly bad could set off a secession bomb. A freesoiler does not want to spread slavery, but he is okay with keeping it in a state it is already in. When the idea of popular sovereignty came about with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A), those freesoilers in office were pushed harder…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.” Whether it was the last resource to keep the Union together or he truthfully supported the amendment, the notion that slavery was the deciding factor that triggered the Civil War does not give justice to other significant events that transpired to reach such…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many times during our class discussions and lectures we tried to examine the stages leading up to the succession and Civil War in America. During the critical time period of the middle 19th century, the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision of the Supreme Court was one of those major treads on the pathway to secession. The man Dred Scott was taken to Missouri with Peter Blow as a slave from Virginia and sold. His new master from Missouri then moved to the free state of Illinois for a while, but later moved back to Missouri. Following his master 's passing, Scott asserted that since he had resided in a free state, he was inevitably a free citizen.…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Baptist Anti-Slavery

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “We propose,” it reads, “to endeavor to remove this ignorance [of the true nature of Slavery] by the circulation of publications depicting its true character, and its appropriate remedy” (10). The Constitution therefore conceives the primarily problem of slavery as one of ignorance. At issue, then, is unveiling what slavery really is, which the Constitution assumes will make abolition appear as the only appropriate remedy. This assumption is worth dwelling on: what is entailed in viewing the persistence of slavery as primarily a problem of ignorance? How would the Society respond to charges that there are many, especially in the South in the heart of plantation slavery, who know slavery quite well, yet are anti-abolition? One answer, on the basis of the Constitution so far, is that those that maintain the tolerance or slavery, or, further, are politically committed to its maintenance, do so because of prejudice against people of color. Slavery is fundamentally related to the problem of racism. This more fundamental problem, according to the Constitution, could also be cast as a problem of ignorance. Racism, as a system and culture arranged by racial hierarchy, is about not knowing the truth about fellow human…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 14th Amendment

    • 1800 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fourteenth Amendment was a direct outgrowth of the national debate over slavery1, and the subsequent emancipation of the slaves during the Civil War. In the aftermath of that war, Congress confronted a number of thorny issues: what would be done about the rebel leaders? Would the defeated states contribute to paying off the Union’s debts? Would slave owners be compensated for the loss of their property? What measures would be required of the defeated states as a condition of their full re-admittance to the Union? Two cases that took place before the creation of the Fourteenth Amendment are particularly important, considering that in a way or another they would help shape this Amendment: Barron vs. Baltimore and Dred Scott vs. Sanford.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1787, at the time of the Constitutional Convention, slavery in the United States was a harsh reality. The census of 1790 counted slaves in nearly every state, the only exceptions being Massachusetts and the "districts" of Vermont and Maine. In the entire country 3.8 million people were counted; 700,000 of them, or 18 percent, were slaves. These statistics are a striking example of the prominence of slavery in the history of the United States. They also exemplify the obvious contradiction between the institution of slavery and the advocacy of equality presented by the framers of our Constitution. Despite the freedoms reserved in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, slavery was not only tolerated, it was regulated.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays