Preview

Wrongdoing The Prosecutor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
274 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wrongdoing The Prosecutor
The position of the prosecutor is powerful through the broad discretion the office holds. “The local prosecutor has been called the single most powerful figure in the administration of criminal justice” (Goelzhauser, 2013). Therefore, it would be unethical to destroy evidence of a defendant’s guilt. The main duty of a prosecutor is to see justice being achieved and the destruction of evidence goes directly against the pursuit of justice and public safety. The use of improper prosecutorial methods would fuel the already unsteady relationship with the public and being tempted to use this power for wrongdoing would greatly tarnish professionalism, justice and trust in the legal system.

The defense attorney’s legal counsel to clients must be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is accountable for exhibiting the state’s evidence as well as presenting and preparing the state’s case against the accused. It is also the prosecuting attorneys responsibility to decide which matters should be tried or not. It is the prosecutor who makes these determinations based on a several sets of criteria. Most prosecutors will study the evidence against the accused, study the crime, as well as many other factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1985, Orenthal James Simpson married Nicole Brown Simpson. Several years later, the couple had filed for divorce. Throughout their marriage Orenthal was allegedly abusing Nicole. On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found dead outside of her Los Angeles home. Both victims had multiple lacerations across their faces and necks. Also, the wounds in their necks were very severe and exposed their larynxes. The police believed the crime was committed between 10:15 and 10:40 p.m. Soon enough, Orenthal was arrested because the LAPD believed he was the main suspect in the double homicide case. When he was arraigned, OJ pleaded not guilty to the charges of first degree murder.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the states evidence and preparing the states case against the accused. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to determine which cases should be pursued and which to let the charges drop. The prosecutor makes these decisions based on a variety of criteria. They will look at the evidence against the accused, the crime itself, the history of the accused as well as many other factors.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brandon L. Garrett's book, Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, he makes it very clear how wrongful convictions occur and how these people have spent many years in prison for crimes they never committed. Garrett presents 250 cases of innocent people who were convicted wrongfully because the prosecutors opposed testing the DNA of those convicted. Garrett provided simple statistics such as graphs, percentages, and charts to help the reader understand just how great of an impact this was.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is somewhat an oxymoron to consider yourself a prosecutor and a good person. Paul Butler writes describing the discrepancies with progressive prosecutors who believes they are able to change the “definition” of a prosecutor. Butler defines a prosecutor as someone one who is “more part of the problem than the solution” and a person who is “geared toward punishing people whose lives are already messed up.” Furthermore, Butler qualifies his definition of a prosecutor by saying the job of some prosecutors is to “mitigate the harshness of the system.” This is a failed attempt to mend the system because their principal work applies the criminal laws instead of ameliorating its negative effects.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Mistakes

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    O.J. Simpson is a very powerful man that revolutionized the idea of a criminal trial. The well known former National Football League player and actor, was tried for the murder of his ex wife Nicole Brown Simpson, and waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman. The trial was broadcasted throughout the country and became part of people's lives. It lasted for almost a year, however on October 3, 1995, Simpson managed to walked out acquitted. To reach such results, Simpson took advantage of his juror's life experience; by making himself sound relatable, also, the prosecution was not well prepared and made several mistakes.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you've been arrested for driving under the influence, or DUI, you're probably worried and confused about what's going to happen to you. If you're like a lot of people, a DUI arrest is your first brush with the criminal justice system, and it can be scary. While you can represent yourself, it's best to hire a criminal defense attorney. Here's why.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Within the criminal trial process, natural tensions ordinarily occur between all participants and procedures of which the system operates, for example Investigation, Trial and Sentencing are three key processes within the criminal justice system that require an appropriate amount of discretion in order to properly and lawfully achieve justice.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecutorial Discretion is the prosecuting attorney having complete authority on the turnout of a case. The prosecuting attorney has discretionary power over matters that involve "whether or not to bring criminal charges, deciding the nature of the charges, plea bargaining, and sentence recommendation" (U.S. Legal Inc, 2016, p. 1). Prosecutors are not obligated to take a victims accusations and represent it in front of a jury. However, the prosecutor is obligated to listen to the story, analyze the evidence, and then decide if they want to move ahead with the case (Bazelon, 2006, p. 2). The discretion comes into action when the prosecutor has analyzed the evidence and learns whether or not the case can be won with the evidence provided.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A prosecutor has limited constraints when bringing charges against someone. A prosecutor cannot bring charges vindictively against a person because a defendant successfully appealed a conviction. In the presence of probable cause the prosecutor is not permitted to bring charges for such improper reasons. It would be inappropriate for a prosecutor to bring charges against someone is if he or she knew that the evidence was tampered with, like improper behavior of a cop. If the attorney knew that the evidence given was under false pretense or had been fabricated, filing charges would be inappropriate. Another case would be if the lawyer trust that there is insufficient evidence to convict or if the case is not sufficiently strong to warrant an indictment. A prosecutor choosing that…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statute Of Limitations

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First of all, prosecutors should be concerned with current crimes, not ones that no longer have any relevance to the community because it is a waste of time to focus on a very old crime. Due to the fact that as criminals get older, they become less active and may no longer be a threat to the society. The data from Federal Bureau of Investigation on crime in the US shows that crime rate decreases when the age of criminals get older. Moreover, new criminals appear every single day. They come up with some new tricks or strategies. Thus, police officers and prosecutors should focus on current crimes in order to provide best safety to the society.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science 1

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that it is important to use proper methods when collection evidence from a crime scene because if you don’t you risk contaminating the evidence and then it will not be able to be used in court.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Idea and City Council

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is very important for the city council and commissioners to understand and appreciate the value of forensic evidence because all funds have to be approved by elected officials and they have to provide oversight for LEO to help prevent violations of funds. Forensic processing and evaluations can be costly and failure to conduct a timely use can lead to a law suit against the city and county. Neither city nor the commissioner wants a law suit against them. Forensics is very important for the commissioner, city council and other people that’s have something to do with running a town to appreciate and understand the value of it. Forensic gives an insight on someone innocent or to prove them guilty and the commissioners should be appreciative of that.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays