Preview

Writ Of Habeas Corpus Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Writ Of Habeas Corpus Essay
Jaquilynn Williford
American National Government ACK1509F
Week 5 Final Paper

Writ of Habeas Corpus Habeas Corpus is simply defined as recourse in law that may be applied before a court in cases where the unlawful detention or imprisonment of a person is suspected. (Wikipedia) A writ of habeas corpus is a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that an inmate be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody. (Lexicon) A habeas corpus petition can be filed to a court by a person who objects to his or her own or another’s detention or imprisonment. Think about pervious wars we have endured. How many detainees have been detained and questioned then released? Many Presidents have tried to deny
…show more content…
It is a commonly used among many countries still today. The concept was first introduced in the Magna Carta in June of 1215; which is “sometimes called the Great Charter, the Magna Charta is widely considered to be the foundation of the English and U.S. constitutional systems, representing the first time the often tyrannical power of the monarchy was restrained by law and popular resistance” (Legal-Dictionary). In the Magna Carta, it states “"No free man shall be seized, or imprisoned, or disseized, or outlawed, or exiled, or injured in any way, nor will we enter on him or send against him except by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land." This principle evolved to mean that no person should be deprived of freedom without Due Process of Law. This defined as a fundamental, constitutional guarantee that all legal proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away one 's life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law shall not be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Magna Carta was the stepping stone for the constitution.It was the first document to challenge the Kings authority and prevlieges.This not only made the king abide by the law, but it also made sure the king couldn't over use his power.The king wasn't allowed to overly abuse his power as king. The Magna Carta has clauses, and these clause list certain laws everyone must abide by.The first Into clauses mainly talk about inheritance and land ownership”The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues, customary dues, and feudal services. He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property.”Clauses six through 8 have to deal with marriage and courtship between people”At her husband's death, a widow may have her marriage portion and inheritance at once and without trouble.”Also it talks about women who lose their husbands and they are know widows. Clauses nine and…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Magna Carta has an example that said, “No freeman shall be captured or imprisoned or...exiled…, except by...lawful judgement. (Document 3) Due Process is also in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen and the example goes like this, “All persons are innocent until...declared guilty.” (Document 6) My last document of discussion is the US Bill of Rights which also has an example of Due Process. As shown by these quotes, Due Process was the right to a fair trial. Fair trial was important in establishing self-government because they knew if they were done wrong, which in turn caused them to want to get rid of their ruler so they could receive individual liberty. In conclusion, the ideal of due process the was in these documents got the ball rolling with knowing the consequences of things that were…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Habeas Corpus today especially after what happened on September 11th President Bush made many efforts to rescind the constitutional rights of habeas corpus. He wanted to refuse habeas corpus trials to those that were in custody at Guantanamo Bay. The President pushed…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” According to our text habeas corpus means, “a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges” (Waldman-Levin, 2012, 5.7). In my opinion for most Americans, habeas corpus protects a prisoner and it also allows a prisoner to indicate that his/her constitution guarantees rights to a fair trial. “From a political point of view, the great value of habeas corpus is that it protects citizens from a dangerous tendency which is generally found in those who exercise the powers of government” (S. G. F., 1888, pg. 454). Habeas corpus is important when it comes to a prisoner questioning why he/she is being held or imprisoned. The Habeas Corpus Act was formed in 1679 and is used to keep an individual from being unlawfully imprisoned.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is derived from the Latin term “you have the body” which is the opening terms of a legal writ (Merriam-webster.com, 2013). Habeas corpus is a legal writ that a person or prisoner can use when they are being detained by the law illegally. A prisoner has the right to know the charges that he or she is being held for and they also have the right to a trial by a jury of his or her peers (Lobban & Halliday, 2011). Habeas corpus is the actual legal action that commands the law (police or military police) to have a court inquiry as to why the detainee is being detained (The Characters of Freedom, n.d.). If the person is being detained for insufficient or unjustifiable reasons the court can order the release of the prisoner. So basically putting it, Habeas corpus is identified as a legal safeguard that protects people’s individual rights and not being illegally imprisoned (A Constitutional History of Habeas Corpus, 1982).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus (or writ of Habeas corpus ) is a judicially enforceable order issued by a court of law to a prison official ordering that a prisoner be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that prisoner had been lawfully imprisoned and, if not, whether he or she should be released from custody. The right of habeas corpus is the constitutionally bestowed right of a person to present evidence before a court that he or she has been wrongly imprisoned. The rights of writs of habeas corpus are granted in Article I of the Constitution, which…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is another check on the use of government power. The definition of habeas corpus translates to “produce the body.” This is a court order stating to deliver the accused individual to the court issuing the order and to show sufficient and valid reasoning behind the arrest…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bush and Habib v. Bush were the initial cases that challenged the Presidential Executive Order in 2001, “which authorized indefinite detention without due process of law, as a violation of international law and the U.S. Constitution” (http://ccrjustice.org/). The government had argued that the detainees were not persecuted under military order, but in fact the “common law powers” (http://ccrjustice.org/). Furthermore, the government had claimed that the matter at hand was not a political question that was under the jurisdiction of the courts; these two claims caused both cases to be dismissed. This action caused the petition for habeas corpus to be void for non-US citizens detained outside the jurisdiction of the United…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    So no one can be placed in a prison and the government can’t explain why. With Habeas Corpus the prison would have to let that individual go. This idea that America uses today was adapted from England. In the late 1600’s the English passed the Habeas Corpus Act.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    haebus corpus

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Habeas corpus has certain limitations. It is technically only a procedural remedy; it is a guarantee against any detention that is forbidden by law, but it does not necessarily protect other rights, such as the entitlement to a fair trial. So if an imposition such as internment without trial is permitted by the law, then habeas corpus may not be a useful remedy. In some countries, the process has been temporarily or permanently suspended, in all of a government's jurisdictions or only some, because of…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Habeas corpus is used when the United States capture someone from another country during war times. It gives the detainees the same privileges the protection under our constitution, but when they are being held in another country they lose those rights. Is it right to hold them in another country just so we can prevent them from having those rights? Is this what needs to be done so we can do as we please to get the information we want from them? You can decide that for yourself on what you believe. We will take a further look into habeas corpus and the war on terror.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Habeas Corpus is known as the Great Writ because it ensures that a person detained by the government is entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. The modern form of Habeas Corpus has evolved over the years, from it beginnings in England, to its addition to the US constitution. While Habeas Corpus pertains to every citizen that is tried in a US court, there is an argument as to weather habeas also applies to alien prisoners that are being held by the US government, on foreign land. In 2002, The Supreme Court began to get involved in this argument, considering the level of the war on terror was high and the Bush Administration had just developed GITMO prison. The argument between the President and the Supreme Court continue today. The question that needs to be answered is: should aliens that are under U.S. detainment on foreign land be entitled the right of habeas corpus?…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War in Terror

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The writ of Habeas corpus is established for any prisoner that is brought before a judge. The writ justifies the defendant to stand trial. If the defendant denied the trial however, the judge will dismiss the trial. Under the US constitutional law the American celebrates the Habeas corpus liberties under a safe guard to give all terrors a chance to attend their trial. Since, June 2004 and 2008 the Habeas corpus has being change because of matter of the trail and historical interest which lead to the Supreme Court to decide about the trial. Habeas case can interact with three interconnected and they are judicial jurisdiction, ordering their release such as ended the trail if the terror that does not show up for their case, and to see if the terrors are enemy combatant of the United States as when terrors attacks the United States. The noncitizen should hold their trial in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba were the Habeas corpus plays a role in which gives them the authority to stand trial. When congress tried to interfere with the Habeas corpus this is when Boumediene step in and let people know congress interfere with the Suspension Clause of Article 1. Therefore, in the United States the Habeas corpus cannot be suspended unless it invasion the public safety.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bush Administration

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. Some legal commentators refer to the right of habeas corpus as the "great writ of liberty" because it is a prisoner's ultimate recourse to an impartial judge who can review the possibility that he is being held…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people don't have the rights of habeas corpus they're not even allowed to fight against why they were or are imprisoned, they can't do anything about it at all. That is a big reason why I think that everyone should have the rights of habeas corpus. if someone is wrongly accused an innocent person is basically just going to be stuck in prison or wherever the government wants to hold them and there's literally nothing they can do about it. So if a foreigner comes to our country and is suspected of being linked with any sort of terrorism their rights are just taken away and they don't have a chance of fighting against…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays