Preview

Words Should Be Removed Persuasive Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
960 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Words Should Be Removed Persuasive Essay
Some people believe the words should be removed for two reasons. The first reason is that the words are unconstitutional. The second reason is that including the words forces certain religious views upon a captive audience. While it seems that the words violate the Constitution, and they appear to force particular tenets onto everyone, in truth the words do not coerce particular religious views, and the words are a part of American culture. The first reason some people claim the words should be removed is because of their belief that the words violet the constitution. The constitution says in the first amendment that you have the freedom of religion. If the U.S. tries to establish an official religion then it would violate the constitution. …show more content…
A captive audience is a group of people being forced to attend. Wisconsin state law says that students have to be in school and the pledge has to be said to be said. This doesn’t mean you are forced to say the pledge, you can opt out if you would like. Humanist Society, a nonprofit religious organization, “The use of the current version of the pledge in public schools violates this Court’s coercion analysis. Reciting ‘under God’ is a religious act. Children, while theoretically having the right to opt out of reciting the Pledge, may not do so because of fear of exposure as outsiders, because they do not have the capacity to do so, or because they wish not to appear unpatriotic to their teachers and classmates. Furthermore, the wish of parents for their children not to recite the Pledge may be ignored, indoctrinating them against the parents’ will,” (10). The Humanist Society believes that you are under some kind of pressure from your peers if you don’t say the pledge. However, they are wrong because people can put up christmas displays in public places. If people can have christmas displays in public areas, then why would it not be ok to keep the words in the pledge. Because some people mistakenly believe the words force religion on a captive audience, they argue the words should be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands; one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The Pledge of Allegiance, written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy has undergone quite an evolution. It was made mandatory in schools by the US Supreme Court in 1940 but was withdrawn three years later, was congressionally recognized as national pledge in 1942 and was further augmented with words “under god” in 1954. Originally meant to be a promise or oath of loyalty to the Republic of United States of America and an expression of patriotism, it has become a lightning rod of controversy, heated passions and lawsuits. The question is whether the Pledge of Allegiance with the words “under god” violates the protections of religious freedoms enshrined in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment? The phrase “under god” does not violate the freedom of religion found in the first amendment. This Clause dictates, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When they added the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, it struck a controversy. Which some people argued it violates their First Amendment. But the phrase reflects America’s civic culture and it isn’t necessarily a religious statement. Though, people has the right to say the Pledge omitting the phrase, thus not violating their freedom of religion.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gwen Wilde, says “In my view, the addition of the words “under God” is inappropriate and they are needlessly divisive –an odd addition indeed to a Nation that is said to be “indivisible.” I agree with the author and believe that the words “under God” can cause hostility or disagreement between fellow Americans. I believe the pledge should be revised. I know that when I recite the pledge I do exactly what I am saying and feel proud to say it. I believe in God, so really I have never had a problem saying the entire pledge of allegiance. I do remember though, when I was in grade school a boy in my class did not recite the pledge of allegiance because of his religion. As Gwen said, “In short, the pledge which ought to unite us all, is indeed divisive.” Therefore, by revising the pledge of allegiance and omitting the words “under God,” many patriotic Americans, new citizens, and school children will be able to pledge allegiance to our flag aloud and proud instead of having to remain silent.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    My opinion my not be the one anyone wants to here because I’m a high school but I have one. Yes, I understand that forcing kids into saying the pledge is crazy but write a note to the teacher or principal and say I don’t what my kid say this or that. I am one hundred percent positive that that school won’t force your kid into saying it. The man Mr. Newbow took it to court on how it’s very offensive to him, well there is a lot of offensive think in this world to me…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under God in the Pledge

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I personally believe that the inclusion of ‘Under God’ should remain in our Pledge, for the simple fact that the majority of our population are believers in a God. I believe that this inclusion becomes unconstitutional when it becomes mandatory for a student to recite this Pledge, being that there will be exceptions with children who do not wish to recite the Pledge for religious-conflicting reasons. An example of this unconstitutionality is the Engel v Vitale case, which included a New York law that required every public school student to recite a non-denominational group prayer written by the State. The prayer written by the State, though non-denominational, is highly suggestive of an inferiority to a higher being, which may often times conflict with those of a Godless belief system. Although the simple requirement of its recitation made it unconstitutional, I believe that the requirement to recite that “we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee [God]…” is controversially immoral, as this recitation not only addresses that…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While I agree with you that there are plenty of other issues going on in the world that needs to be addressed; however, I do think that this is one of those issues. I believe that this is a problem because it still stands for a country that no longer represents what those words have to say. Keeping those words in the Pledge of Allegiance only further promotes reasons for people to point out those that are different. I'm not religious at all and I have never been. I was forced as a child to go to church and I was forced to recite the Pledge of Allegiance every day at school. It always made me feel uncomfortable to say under God because I never felt that it represented me and what I thought our country stood for. We can't keep saying…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some think that it was part of something far and unknown. No, actually it is and forever will be a big part in American history. Trying to remove it now is thoughtless, we shouldn't have to relearn to whole pledge because of some small percentage of who either don't believe in God or don't believe in "forcing" students to say it. Removing the words "under God" from the pledge, is going to hurt our belief in traditions. In the same article it says, " 'Most Americans have recited the pledge hundreds of times and are not inclined to memorize a different pledge', he says. 'Changing it may just feel wrong. Most Americans they believe in God or a higher being and feel comfortable having "under God" in the pledge.' " In other words barley anyone wants to learn a different pledge and the current one makes sense to the majority. Furthermore, our nation was built up on religious principles, shouldn't it stay that way? Why should we change it? Also, in an article called "Trump: 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance Is 'a Great Thing' it says, " 'Because that's what we are and that is what we will always be, and that is what our people want', he said." Trump says that we thought of ourselves as living under God, and we think the same way…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Of the civil liberties included in the constitution which do you think is most important? Why?…

    • 351 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal side of the pledge of allegiance, it has been brought up to the supreme court more then one separate occasion. “The state’s Supreme Judicial Court is currently weighing an atheist couple’s argument that the words “under God” be struck from the Pledge of Allegiance, because they claim the phrase is exclusionary to atheist children like theirs” (Let’s End the Pledge of Allegiance in Schools). Again, going back to the history, the original version of the pledge of allegiance had no stating of religion. When Francis Bellamy added “under God” into the pledge, what he didn't realize is that it was violating peoples freedom of religion and was to be used in public school systems across the country. It sparked a world wide debate that is…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pledge Of Allegiance

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1954, President Eisenhower and Congress added the phrase “under God” into the Pledge of Allegiance. It has remained in our nation’s pledge for sixty-two years. However, some of our nation’s population believes that the words “under God” are a religious phrase and therefore violate the establishment clause of the first amendment. They think that “under God” is offensive and too straightforward and do not realize the history behind it. I strongly believe that the words “under God” should be kept in the Pledge of Allegiance.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This mindset ostracizes those who choose to opt out of saying it. Recently, a Colorado teacher of Angevine Middle School assaulted a student who refused to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance (Wootson). While this is just one instance, many school officials react violently to students who wish to opt out. While some are merely unaware that students have the right to sit out the Pledge, others are aware of the law but make it a point to bully students into participation anyway (Niose). Additionally, when used in an exercise designed to teach patriotism to children, the words “under God” send the message that true patriots believe in God. “While a God-believer can proudly say the Pledge of Allegiance, [a] [nonbeliever] must choose to: 1) absent [themselves] from the practice 2) participate in the exercise that denigrates [their] beliefs, or 3) say a different pledge by omitting ‘under God’ which exposes the student and makes [them] appear unpatriotic” (Miller). No one would seriously contend that the daily recitation of “one nation for atheists” is not discriminatory simply because it is optional, yet “under God” is deemed as…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pledge of Allegiance was written to fit any person in any country but the in 1945 the U.S. adopted it and changed it twice to fit our country but it wasn’t used in the morning to start the day for fifty-five years. In 2004 a student named Michael Newdow argued that “under God” challenged the right to freedom of religion and violated the prohibition on the establishment of religion in the First Amendment of the United States…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Again this comes from years of twisting and turning of words and arguments as to the intent of the framers. The issue stems from the interpretation of the wording “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion”. Some people say that this means that no laws will be made that respects any religion over another, while others argue that the intent of the framers was to prohibit the government from establishing laws that set up one religious point of view as the official religion such as they experienced in England. Regardless of what position people take, the Supreme Court has ruled that there shall be no law that respects one religion over another. This decision affirmed the idea of separation of church and state. In response to this ruling, it has become illegal to display the Ten Commandments in public buildings because this is considered the foundation on which Christianity and Judaism was founded. According to the Supreme Court this display violates the First Amendment rights of those citizens who are not Christians or Jews to have no official religion. Christians argue that while they believe that the Ten Commandments were given to the people by God as a way to self govern themselves according to His will, they also believe that these are good rules for anyone to follow regardless of their religious position and that by removing these laws of God from publicly owned property, it violates the Christians right to freedom of…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.“ This amendment prohibits the government from making a national religion as well as protecting those who practice any religion from Christianity to Judaism. This amendment was written on June 7, 1789 and ratified December 15, 1791. James Madison, include an attribute said “ The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretence, infringed.'' Freedom of Religion was important to our Founding Fathers. In Britain there was a lot of Religious Persecution in the 19th century. Many people were executed for practicing a religion other than Protestant. Clearly our founding fathers knew that something was wrong with that. Why should someone be killed for practicing a religion other than the one you personally believe…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The First Ten Amendments

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages

    My father was a minister, and was thus afforded the right to practice and teach his children what he believed, without government interference. The Freedom of Speech goes right along with the Freedom of Religion, because I am allowed to voice my opinions and beliefs without repercussion. There are many issues with the First Amendment when it comes to Freedom of Religion, with one of the major issues being the Separation of Church and State. Is our right to Freedom of Religion being taken away from us by not allowing the use of prayer in schools? If you want to say a prayer in school with other believers, is this in violation of the amendment? How is it that if for religious reasons, you choose not to immunize your children, you can then have the State Department called to your home for child neglect? Does this Amendment not give us the right to make choices for ourselves and our families? I chose this picture to represent my feelings on religion. I believe it should be my right to teach, express and voice my beliefs, without the interference of the State.…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays