Preview

Words Are Loaded Pistols

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Words Are Loaded Pistols
Ways of Knowing: Language
“Words are Loaded Pistols” – Jean-Paul Sartre

This essay is written, to show the power of words, and to explain the quote above by Jean-Paul Sartre. I will relate this topic to ways and areas of knowing. Some examples might be given throughout the explanation of the quote and how it can be seen.

Words are loaded pistols means to me, that thoughts are pistols, and words are loaded pistols, when you speak, you shoot the words out. The difference between thoughts and words is that thoughts are something we think of, evaluate it for ourselves, words are eventually the conclusion we have made out of our thoughts. This can be seen as a political thing, politicians, before taking extreme measures and going to war, talk diplomatically. They kind of shoot each other with thoughts and words. When they speak they give their opinion and therefore it can be seen as a violent thing. Politicians quarrelling about what they want and need from the other, demanding for peace while trying to get something out of it as well. For example, the Middle-East conflict, where Israel wants to make peace with the Palestinians, who see Israel wanting peace so much as an opportunity to demand more and more land.

This quote can be related to emotion, perception and even belief. This quote can be a form of perception, since every person sees it differently just as Sartre had his own view when he wrote this quote. For some, this might seem emotional, and may not agree with it. Going back to the political use of it, if someone has died in ones family by a gunshot, he might see it the political way and say the person shooting could have just talked instead of shot. Violence is not always the answer to everything.
This can also be seen as a thing you believe in, belief may restrict you from talking in some religions. Some religions, have things to hide, here is a fragment about a man who has reconsidered his views of the church and wants to leave.
“ This bishop,



Bibliography: http://www.exmormon.org/mormon/mormon150.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Scott attempts to address three questions: “Is there one way of knowing or many? What sort of knowing does rhetoric strive to achieve? Is rhetorical relativism vicious?” (1976, 259). He states that there are many ways of knowing, emphasizing the pluralistic nature of ‘ways of knowing.’ He believes that rhetoric should strive to achieve an actuality, or an agreed social construction (later it will become apparent that this facet of his argument is the one sparking the most debate). Finally, he attempts to dispel the positivist argument against him, that rhetorical relativism is vicious. This leads to some deeper discussion on the nature of subjective knowledge, of which his defining argument seems to…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This statement was in response to his participation in a non-violent campaign march in a town that still had many problems with segregation. He explains that he was asked there because of organizational ties, and that he was there because of injustice. He also brings up that the demonstrations were in response to a meeting they had previous with city leaders where promises were made and then broken. He goes on to explain the situation and the need for direct action so that it can lead to negotiation. He also brings up an idea that there is a difference in laws and how they are used. This difference is referred to as "just" and "unjust." Laws are unjust depending on if they restrict people unfairly, or if man uses them to restrict other people unfairly. He gives blame to the white moderate who is happy living with a negative peace and not willing to have the disorder to gain a positive peacefulness. He gives examples of injustices in the past, such as Christians being willing to face hungry lions versus submitting to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire. He says that society must, "protect the robbed and punish the robber." He also brings up the example that what Adolf Hitler did in Germany was legal at the time. Just because it was legal, didn't…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This quotation reminds me of the crime that happened around Middle East which the kids didn’t have a safe life and they are live in dangerous everyday. This is because of the trttorist organization take over the control of government. Also, this quotation makes me feel sad becasue they are still kids but they are already lose their future and their life.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Are We?

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this section ‘I think, therefore I am’ Alsford looks into human beings as subjects and refers to the philosophy of Rene Descartes concerning human nature. Descartes theorized that if he thought that something is false and he is the one thinking it, he states: “I think, therefore I am.” Descartes philosophy continues to dominate Western thought and culture even to this day.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Methods and Meditations on First Philosophy is a discourse by Rene Descartes, which largely focuses on the nature of humanity and divinity. This essay is a discussion of this discourse, and will summarize, explain and object to various parts of his work. The majority of this essay focuses on Descartes Sixth Meditation, which includes his argument that corporeal things do exist.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "In the deeper layers of the modern consciousness, all means are unlawful, every attempt to succeed is an act of aggression, leaving one alone and guilty and defenseless among enemies: one is punished for success."…

    • 1567 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ishmael Beah

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "There is only one way in which one can endure man's inhumanity to man and that is to try, in one's own life, to exemplify man's humanity to man."…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Later on a French philosopher, René Descartes, comes along and tries to answer the question of true knowledge on his…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I will attempt to explain why Sartre argues that emotions are transformations of the world in his book, “A sketch for the Theory of the Emotions”. According to Sartre, an emotion is a response to a situation, an interaction with the world. Emotions control the way we act under certain circumstances and in certain situations, which is our behaviour, and we feel like we have no control. However, although we blame our behaviour on our emotions (“I hit that man because I was angry”) Sartre argues that we are actively in control of our emotions. But emotions need stimuli to occur, they do not just happen. We may be control of our emotions, but an event or situation is still the reason we feel emotions. As I will show in this piece of work, Sartre argues that we control our emotions, but only to a certain extent.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument of whether we humans are pre determined to turn out how we are and act the way we do or if we are our own decision makers and have the freedom to choose our paths in life is a long-standing controversy. The ideas of Sartre, Freud, and Darwin are each strong in their own manner, yet Sartre presents the best and most realistic argument as to how we choose our path; we are in control of the things we do and responsible for the decisions we make. Not only this, but also, our decisions have an effect on our peer’s choices, just as theirs affect ours. In this paper, I will argue that Jean-Paul Sartre makes the best argument of the three philosophers in saying we can choose our own path and direction in life because as humans we are consciously aware of what is going on around us and base our decisions on that.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Uncanny Valley

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages

    ‘There is an universal tendency among mankind to conceive all beings like themselves, and to transfer to every object, those qualities, with which they are familiarly acquainted, and of which they are intimately conscious. No wonder, then, that mankind, being placed in such an absolute ignorance of causes, and being at the same time so anxious concerning their future fortune, should immediately acknowledge a dependence on invisible powers, possessed of sentiment and intelligence. The unknown causes, which continually employ their thought,…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Souls

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jean Paul Sartre believed in existence proceeds essence. What this means is what you do is all up to your freewill. Your destiny is created by what you do in life. Miss Emily says, “That it might look as though you…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, I will argue Descartes’ argument, that it is possible to gain knowledge, is flawed and incorrect. First, I will set out Descartes’ premise for believing knowledge is possible. Next, I will reintroduce his ideas in order to point out flaws and show the weakness of his position. Then, I will provide a counter to my assertions. Finally, I will give my reasons for supporting the notion that it is not possible to gain knowledge.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    René Descartes and John Locke, both seventeenth century philosophers, are often seen as two of the first early modern philosophers. Both Descartes and Locke attempt to find answers to the same questions in metaphysics and epistemology; among these: What is knowledge? Is there certainty in knowledge? What roles do the mind and body play in the acquisition of knowledge? Descartes and Locke do not provide the same answers to these questions. In this paper the similarities and differences between the philosophies of Descartes and Locke will be addressed.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics