Preview

“With reference to the decisions of the Courts and Parliament discuss whether the government should change the law on assisted suicide and allow mercy killings in some circumstances.”

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1532 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“With reference to the decisions of the Courts and Parliament discuss whether the government should change the law on assisted suicide and allow mercy killings in some circumstances.”
“With reference to the decisions of the Courts and Parliament discuss whether the government should change the law on assisted suicide and allow mercy killings in some circumstances.”

Assisted suicide is a form of self-inflicted death in which a person voluntarily brings about his or her own death with the help of another, usually a physician or relative; however it is a very controversial topic. Currently assisted suicide is illegal in England under the terms of the SUICIDE ACT (1961). It states that aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring somebody in the act of suicide is punishable by up to 14 years imprisonment.
Involuntary euthanasia is also more commonly referred to as Mercy Killing, and it is the act of painlessly killing someone suffering from an incurable and painful disease or someone in an irreversible vegetative condition with very little quality of life.
Many cases have been brought to court involving assisted suicide and mercy killings. People suffering from degenerative or terminal illnesses usually go to court in order to win a legal battle allowing them to end their own, however these people are usually incapable of physically ending their own life, and therefore aim to win the right to allow a relative or physician to assist them without them facing any legal charges afterwards, as under current law, anyone who assists someone is committing an offence. Court cases that concern mercy killings/involuntary euthanasia are usually involving the family of a patient who is unable to state whether or not they wish to end their own life, but it is usually the family or a doctor who believe that a mercy killing would be in the patients best interests as their quality of life is minimal.
The outcomes of these cases have been mixed, and there is no continuity within the verdicts given, some have been granted the rights to allow assisted suicide and mercy killings whilst others have not.
After researching some of the most controversial and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The word Euthanasia derives from the Greek words Eu and Thanatos which means easy or good death. Euthanasia is is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma[1]. Euthanasia exists in various forms, each one specific in its criteria. Firstly there is active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves the use of direct action in order to end the patient’s life whilst passive euthanasia is the withholding of medical aid in order to allow the patient to die naturally such as not performing life-extending surgery or turning off a life support system. The next distinction is between Voluntary and Involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia involves the patient’s termination at their own request whilst involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient is unable to ably make a decision and therefore a suitable person makes the decision for them. Indirect euthanasia involves treating the patients pain but with the side effect of death, the primary intention is often used to justify the outcome. This is often referred to as the doctrine of double effect and in reality is not considered euthanasia given that the real purpose of the treatment is pain relief and death is merely seen as the side-affect. Finally there is assisted suicide which involves a patient incapable of committing suicide themselves asks for assistance in doing so. Euthanasia is a controversial topic that contradicts the age old moral injunction “thou shalt not kill”[2]. But similarly denying patient’s of this choice is defying medical practice cornerstones such as the patient’s autonomy and promoting their best interests. Different countries hold varying stances on Euthanasia but it is currently illegal in the UK. Most recently the case of Tony Nicklinson, a man totally paralysed by locked-in syndrome requesting euthanasia, has come to the forefront of the debate. Given the right to take his case to…

    • 5500 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major claim of this editorial, is that legalized doctor-assisted suicide is euthanasia. We are asking for the right to decide though the court system, if an individual’s life is valuable or not. Some may claim we are just hiding or heartless nature and corrupt moral standards to justify our actions.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    <br>Euthanasia is often confused with physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia is when one person does something that directly kills another. For example, a doctor gives a lethal injection to a patient. In assisted suicide, a non-suicidal person knowingly and intentionally provides the means or acts in some way to help a suicidal person kill himself or herself. For example, a doctor writes a prescription for poison, or someone hooks up a face mask and tubing to a canister of carbon monoxide and then instructs the suicidal person on how to push a lever so that she'll be gassed to death. For all practical purposes, any distinction between euthanasia and assisted suicide has been abandoned today.…

    • 2774 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to these tragic events Nicklinson’s fight for the ‘right to die’ is argued by the high court. Although, it may be his wish; but the court see his it as he is using euthanasia is taking advantage of his vulnerability.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is known as the practice of deliberately ending a life which releases an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. This mercy killing is often referred as an easy and painless death. This can be done from the request of a dying patient or that person’s legal representative.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living is more valuable than dying and threatening to diminish the value of life is dangerous. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of doctors intentionally ending a terminally ill patient’s life in what is purportedly a gentle and dignified manner. The term originated in ancient Greek and means “easy death.” Doctors perform euthanasia by administering lethal drugs or by withholding treatment that would prolong the patient’s life. Physician-assisted suicide is also a form of euthanasia, but the difference between the two methods is that in euthanasia, doctors end the patient’s life with lethal injections, whereas, in physician-assisted suicide, patients kill themselves with a lethal amount of drugs prescribed by the doctors.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia advocates Patients are constantly receiving criticism from those who believe that euthanasia is not ethical and should be illegal everywhere. Euthanasia can be defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The practice of euthanasia is illegal in most countries. Euthanasia can be either voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when the patient requests to die. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient is either unconscious or unable to make a choice regarding their death and an appropriate person makes this decision for them. Involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient wishes to live but is killed anyway and is considered murder. There are different…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eventually we all pass away; no one wants to think about it but in the end we have to go one of two ways, either painfully and unexpected, or comforted and prepared. Although assisted suicide is an “easy way out” every other option available in caregiving is reviewed and attempted before doctor assisted suicide is even consider. Patients should hold the right to avoid excruciating pain and suffering by having a timely and dignified death. As addressed by multiple court reviews, a mentally competent, terminally individual has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end their own intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Supporters of assisted suicide believe that this act benefit terminally ill patients by relieving their suffering. This is probably one of the reasons why Netherlands court determined that a physician is allowed to prevent severe and irreversible suffering, even if it reduces patient’s life (Bosshard et al, 2002). The act of assisted suicide or active euthanasia is allowed in Netherlands, Switzerland and Oregon under different conditions and legislations. The situation can be seen differently in places, where by moral and legal discourse; assisted suicide is interpreted as the freedom or right of the individual as in Switzerland and some states of US. From the ethical perspective, patient’s choice of suicide represents an expression of self- determination and while exercising self- determination people take responsibility of their lives and for the kind of person they become. They have a right to refuse the life- sustaining treatment if they don’t want to suffer anymore and according to law, physicians must respect their decisions to forgo life- sustaining treatment that are capable of making their end of life decisions. By refusing life- sustaining treatment, terminally ill people know that they are going to die soon and in order to avoid suffering or pain they ask physicians for assistance to end their…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in other parts of the world, assisted dying is legal. For example, in Switzerland, at special clinics such as ‘Dignitas’, people can go with loved ones to end their lives. What is unique about Swiss law is that non-Swiss citizens can go to Switzerland to end their lives, under the conditions that there is no ‘financial motive’ for any involved. In the Netherlands, it is legal for Dutch people to undertake assisted dying provided that they have a ‘reasonable understanding of their interests’; for example, under-18s are not considered competent to make this decision. Also, in the state of Oregon in the U.S., is it legal to request lethal medication.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, assisted suicide has become a rather controversial topic regarding whether or not a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. While some are against it due to moral beliefs, others support it as a result of their respect for those suffering. However, physicians remain divided on the issue, being torn on the difference between relief from dying and murder. After analyzing the issue in depth, it is clear that terminally ill patients should be granted the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce financial burdens placed upon their families, and preserve the right of individuals to determine their own fate when facing death.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sanction the taking of innocent human life is to contradict a primary purpose of law in an ordered society. A law or court decision allowing assisted suicide would demean the lives of vulnerable patients and expose them to exploitation by those who feel they are better off dead. Such a policy would corrupt the medical profession, whose ethical code calls on physicians to serve life and never to kill.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A common case associated with the Right to Die is the case of Karen Ann Quinlan. Ms. Quinlan was a twenty-one year-old living in New Jersey. She slipped into a coma after consuming too much alcohol and overdosing on drugs. Her parents wept as they thought their daughter was going to die. Ms. Quinlan was immediately put on a respirator and miraculously survived, although she was completely unresponsive, was fed through a tube, and could not survive without medicine. The Quinlan family noticed that their daughter was struggling and they requested for her daughter to be taken off life support and allowed to die. The hospital refused and an unsuccessful lawsuit followed. However, once turned to the New Jersey Supreme Court, the ruling was overturned. Strict guidelines were in place. The medical team agreed and took Ms. Quinlan off the feeding tube and respirator. Doctors kept a twenty-four seven watch on Miss Quinlan, feeding her and providing common needs, knowing that she still had some fight left in her. Miss Quinlan fought for ten years in pain until acute pneumonia ended her life. This case had a huge impact on all decisions for the Right to Die. Miss Quinlan’s suffering was cited as the reason the Right to Die should be available for adults that are going to die. Although Ms. Quinlan showed America that there is hope in surviving, it also showed America that…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appellants (M, N and L) appealed against a decision ([2012] EWHC 2381, [2012] 3 F.C.R. 233) concerning the illegality of assisted suicide and euthanasia. M, N and L wished to die but were incapable of ending their own lives without the assistance of a third party or euthanasia carried out by the third party. It was likely that those who provided such assistance would be guilty of assisted suicide under the Suicide Act 1961 s.2(1), whilst those who carried out euthanasia would be guilty of murder. After the decision in R. (on the application of Purdy) v DPP [2009] UKHL 45, [2010] 1 A.C. 345, the DPP had set out in a policy statement the factors to be taken into account when considering whether to prosecute assisted suicide cases. The court was required to determine whether (i) to grant a declaration, as sought by L, that necessity should be a defence to a charge of euthanasia and assisted suicide where certain conditions were met; (ii) the blanket legal prohibition on providing assistance to those wishing to die constituted a disproportionate interference with the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8; (iii) the DPP should set out in greater detail, as sought by M, how he would exercise his discretion to initiate prosecution in cases of assisted suicide in order to make the law more accessible and foreseeable.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She concludes by discussing the treatable depression and avoidable pressures that lead to the majority of assisted suicides. As the debate transitions into the question and answer portion, the panel first discusses the difference between a patient being taken off life support and a patient consuming lethal drugs. They also acknowledge the concept of a “slippery slope” and analyze whether assisted suicide is a gateway to euthanasia. Though both sides agree that an extensive psychological exam is a necessary prerequisite for assisted suicide, there is conflict over the effectiveness of current laws. It is clear that the anti-legalization debaters prioritize stopping pain by any means necessary, while the pro-legalization panel values the patient’s wishes. Finally, the debate proceeds to the closing statements. Peter Singer, advocating for the motion, reiterates that to have the option of aid in dying is something terminally ill patients deserve, because it is a person’s right to decide if life is worth living or…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays