No two people have the exact same definition of good or evil, and without a clear definition of what good and evil really is, it’s impossible to determine if human nature truly is good or bad. Every individual has a different set of morals and beliefs with hopes and dreams that differ from everyone else. How, then, does one determine a generalized statement of human nature when each human is different? For example, consider Republicans and Democrats – they each have very different ideals, and both think that the other is wrong. It’s impossible to determine which of the two is right because they are both right in their own mind. Now consider a serial killer – an “ordinary” citizen would abhor the thought of murdering other human beings, but in a serial killer’s mind, they are doing what they truly believe is right. The concepts of good and evil are fluid; opening fire on a group of civilians is atrocious under normal circumstances, yet during a time of war, it is considered routine. Humans cannot be defined as “good” or “bad” due to the inconsistency of their …show more content…
For the sake of argument, imagine that the refusal to uphold the articles addressed in this declaration is what defines an evil act. If one were to accept this, then one needs only to look into human history to see examples of the evil that humans are capable of. Human history is a story told through wars, famines, genocides, and indecency. Warlords and dictators have always been in power while others avert their eyes. However, for every example of the evil in human nature, there is an example of good; there is a Mother Teresa for every Saddam Hussein, or a Mahatma Gandhi for every Mao Zedong. Through the darkness of human history are examples of light that these good individuals bring with them that are proof of good residing in humans, too. Human nature is a collaboration of good and evil that have fused together to create an imperfect species that, as a whole, balances between its two