Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

WIIFM

Better Essays
2118 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
WIIFM
History 2
MANILA, Philippines Philippine President Benigno Aquino III vowed Wednesday his country will not back down from any challenge to its sovereignty and territory amid a sea dispute with China.
He said in a speech marking the 115th anniversary of the country's independence from Spain that the Philippines has not claimed territory that clearly belongs to another country but only asks that "our territory, rights and dignity be respected."
"Aggression does not run in our veins, but neither will we back down from any challenge," Aquino told government workers, diplomats and supporters at a public square named after revolutionary leader Andres Bonifacio, where he also led a flag-raising ceremony.
Aquino said in the next five years, 75 billion pesos ($1.74 billion) will be spent to modernize the armed forces.
He did not mention China by name, but the two countries have an ongoing territorial row in the disputed Spratly islands.
Last month, the Philippines protested the presence of a Chinese warship, two surveillance vessels and fishing boats off a shoal occupied by Filipino troops in the Spratlys in the latest territorial squabble between the two Asian countries.
Ayungin Shoal lies 196 kilometers (122 miles) from the southwestern Philippine province of Palawan. It is guarded by a Filipino marine unit based in a rusty warship that ran aground on a coral outcrop several years ago. The shoal is near Mischief Reef, which the Philippines had claimed but was occupied by China in 1995, sparking intense protests from Manila.
Chinese maritime surveillance ships have also taken control of Scarborough Shoal, which Beijing calls Huangyan Island, and have roped off the entrance to its vast fishing lagoon following a two-month standoff with Philippine government ships last year. The chain of reefs and rocks 230 kilometers (143 miles) west of the northwestern Philippine province of Zambales falls under its 200-nautical miles (370-kilometer) exclusive economic zone, Filipino officials say. Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan and Vietnam also claim parts of the Spratlys, a chain of islands, islets and reefs.
On Tuesday, some 30 Filipino protesters wearing colorful fish masks gathered outside China's consular office in Manila to demand a stop to Chinese intrusions into Philippine claimed islands in the Spratlys.
E-source: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/06/12/4100411/philippines-vows-to-defend-territory.html

History 2

MANILA, Philippines — Vice President Jejomar Binay led a flag raising ceremony at the Luneta Park as the country celebrated its 115th year of independence Wednesday.
The flag raising at the shrine of Dr. Jose Rizal was followed by a wreath laying ceremony. A 21-gun salute was also offered to the hero.

Binay was accompanied by Major General Essel Soriano, vice commander of Philippine Army.
Speaking to reporters, Binay said this day served as a time to remember the sacrifices made to attain independence.

Asked if he thought that the country was free, Binay said in Filipino: “It’s possible for us to deal with other nations, we can also offer our goodwill but this doesn’t mean that we’re no longer free.”

Among those gathered were representatives from the Veterans Federation of the Philippines, Knights of Rizal, MASON,Boys and Girls Scout of the Philippines, and Metropolitan Manila Development Authority.

The program that started at 8 a.m. followed the theme: Kalayaan 2013: Ambagan Tungo sa Malawakang Kaunlaran.

Guards wearing the historical gray Katipunero uniform lined up in front of the monument.
Security officers from the Manila Police District were also seen in the area.

Kenneth Montegrande, spokesman of the National Parks Development Committee, said among the programs lined up for this day’s celebration, are the showing of free movies under the theme “SineKlayaan”, a dramatization on Rizal’s execution, a job fair, Sky Diving Exhibition, Band Exhibition, and free medical and dental check-ups.

From 6 p.m. to 11 p.m., members of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, Philippine National Police, Philippine Coast Guard, and Bureau of Jail Management and Penology, on the other hand, will stage a “MusiKalayaan Concert” at the Quirino Grandstand in Luneta.

E-sources: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/424821/binay-leads-115th-independence-day-rites-in-luneta

History 2
Independence
By Conrado de Quiros
Philippine Daily Inquirer
9:37 pm | Tuesday, June 11th, 2013
Who’s the bigger hero, Jose Rizal or Andres Bonifacio?
We’ve expended no small amount of energy, or indeed passion, trying to answer that question, and will probably expend a little bit more of it over the next several months as we inch toward Bonifacio’s 150th birth anniversary in November. P-Noy’s Independence Day speech on Wednesday will highlight the drama, being held at the Liwasang Bonifacio and dwelling, if the press releases are to be believed, on Bonifacio’s greatness.
The question is not irrelevant, and is often fraught with meaning and implication. Such as during the 1960s and 1970s when the Left extoled the virtues of Bonifacio over Rizal and proposed to make him the national hero instead of Rizal. The argument being that Bonifacio acted while Rizal merely wrote, Bonifacio waged a revolution while Rizal merely campaigned for reform, Bonifacio represented freedom while Rizal represented only enlightenment. Indeed, the argument being that the only reason Rizal and not Bonifacio was the national hero was that Rizal was burgis while Bonifacio was proletarian, Rizal wielded the pen while Bonifacio wielded the bolo, Rizal was safe while Bonifacio remained dangerous.
Truly, the past is never past.
I did buy the argument in my activist days, but I’ve since thoroughly revised my opinion. Both in fact were revolutionaries through and through. Both in fact were dangerous in the extreme.
The fault lies in thinking that writing is not acting, ideas do not move the world, only actions do. Rizal wrote, and by doing so moved the world, and by doing so changed the world. By his work, indeed by what he was—writer, doctor, artist, scientist, historian, ethnographer, lover: a Renaissance man in every respect—he showed not just that the indio could be equal to his master but that he could be better than him. The Spaniards were right to find Rizal the most subversive person in the country. His very existence assailed them.
You need no further proof of it than that Bonifacio himself thought so. Rizal was his greatest influence along with Victor Hugo. He was what turned him into one of the world’s greatest revolutionaries.
Yes, the world’s. A thing grossly unappreciated, simply because unlike Mao and Ho and Mandela, he did not write as resolutely as he acted, he did not theorize as resolutely as he practiced. And, well, he did not live long enough to see the fruits of his labor. Or fight yet another tyrant from another shore.
But what Bonifacio did was spectacular, envisioning, founding, and launching the first plebeian, or proletarian, revolution in the colonies. The Latin American revolutions had come earlier, in the 1820s, but they had been bourgeois revolutions, led by the creoles and mestizos. Bonifacio’s revolution was not, it was organized by an indio, led by a working man who sold canes and fans, unleashed by someone who had fought adversity all his life but had sought salvation and liberation and freedom not just for himself but for his fellow indios. Until it was seized from him, plucked away from him, by an elite that had scoffed at it and blocked it but wanted it for itself when it began to show the promise of success.
I leave this country to (re)discover Bonifacio’s greatness over the next few months as scholars and commentators and public officials draw more attention to it. But though the question of whether Rizal or Bonifacio is the greater hero is not unimportant—and has at least the supreme merit of getting us to be more interested in the past; nothing like controversy or intrigue to do the trick—there’s one far more so.
That is the question of why after such an auspicious beginning, we’ve reached such a pathetic ending. Why after a grand and heroic time—having to debate who is the grander hero, Rizal or Bonifacio, is an embarrassment of riches—we’ve reached a miserable and pedestrian pass. Why after a time when we had the vision and resolve to make history, to try to change the world, we’ve reached a pass where we just want to make do, to get by as best we may in strange and hostile lands.
Of course we have another colonizer, the one that came after we came near to toppling the first, to thank for that. Who are of course the Americans, who seized Spain’s colonies toward the end of the 19th century, who insisted that the one country that had produced Rizal and Bonifacio, the enlightenment and the revolution in the very far East, was badly in need of civilizing. Who rooted out every seed and sapling and shoot of the Filipino’s pride, preventing him from flying his flag, from singing his songs, from remembering everything that came before that gave him dignity, that gave him character, that defined him.
And of course we have another despot, oppressor, an a–hole who came well after we had presumably gained our freedom, after we were presumably breathing the air of free men, who turned us into a nation of slaves again after vowing fervently to make this nation great again. Name that tune, or tyrant.
But in the end, we have ourselves to thank for it, in our unwillingness to be like Rizal and Bonifacio and fight against arguably prodigious adversity, and meet head-on a patently daunting challenge. In our refusal to be like Bernardo Carpio, pushing against the clashing rocks of forgetfulness and mediocrity, willing, bidding, flailing at ourselves to remember we truly were great once and can be so again. In our inability, like Theseus, to discover Ariadne’s thread, which is our thread to the past, which is our recollection of the past, a past as grand and glorious as they come in all its striving and for all its constantly being thwarted, and to find our way out of the Minotaur’s cave.
Our war for independence isn’t over. It’s raging in the mind.

E-source: http://opinion.inquirer.net/54419/independence

History 2
PUERTO PRINCESA CITY – Filipinos students usually learn about patriotism by studying the life of Jose Rizal or Andres Bonifacio’s struggle for independence against Spanish colonizers. But not in the Kalayaan Group of Islands (KIG) and other towns of Palawan province.
There, students are not just lectured about national heroes. They are also taught about freedom and patriotism through fresher lessons that are more fitting to the challenges faced by the country as it pushes its claim over portions of Spratlys, including KIG, which are also claimed by China and other Asian countries. At the start of classes on Monday, officers of the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ (AFP) Western Command (Wescom) joined school children all over the province in their flag ceremony. After leading the recitation of the “Panatang Makabayan” (Patriotic Oath), AFP officers imparted messages of peace and nationalism, including the importance of the Philippines’ claim over KIG. With a map of the West Philippine Sea, Major Oliver Banaria, commander of the 6th Civil Relations Group, showed the students of East Central School the islands that comprise Kalayaan, stressing the importance of engaging the youth in territorial issues concerning the West Philippine Sea.
“Mahalagang malaman ng mga kabataan, kasabay ng pagtuturo natin sa kanila ng pagiging makabayan in their formative years, 'yong kahalagahan ng claimnatin sa Kalayaan. Na atin 'yong Kalayaan at para sa kanila, sa susunod na henerasyon ng mga Pilipino kaya natin ipinaglalaban ang Kalayaan” Banaria told InterAksyon.com. [The youth should learn the importance of our claim in Kalayaan while we teach them to become nationalistic during their formative years. Kalayaan is ours and it’s for them, too, for the next generation of Filipinos, that’s why we are fighting for Kalayaan.] Wescom chief Major General Rustico Guerrero said AFP’s activity with the students was very relevant and timely.
“As our country faces challenging times, this activity fortifies our most potent weapon to overcome the odds –faith in God and love for our country. With these, we shall stand strong as a nation, from generation to generation,” Guerrero said.
The Philippine has been protesting what it calls the "provocative and illegal presence" of two Chinese surveillance vessels and a military ship within KIG’s Ayungin Reef. Manila called on Beijing to respect Philippine sovereignty over its waters. The Philippines said two Chinese maritime surveillance ships and a warship had been spotted off the reef. The Chinese ships appeared to have accompanied some 30 fishing vessels from China, which were scattered around Ayungin. By: Elmer Badilla, InterAksyon.com
June 4, 2013 6:56 AM
E-source: http://www.interaksyon.com/article/63247/in-palawan-student-lessons-on-patriotism-are-not-just-about-rizal-but-spratlys-too

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Guadalcanal is a large mountainous island with tropical rainforests and sandy beaches. It is a province of the Solomon Islands, an independent island state located north-east of Australia in the Pacific Ocean. Guadalcanal is known for its diving and snorkeling sites where the wreckage of ships and planes from the Battle of Guadalcanal. The Battle for Guadalcanal between American and Japanese troops was one of the most strategic battles of WWII (www.guadalcanal.com; www.history.com).…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | After the Spanish-American War, heated debates raged over the imperialism of annexing * THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I reflect on our own Declaration of Independence that states "Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." We went to the Philippines to protect them from Spain and now here we are doing what we were keeping Spain from doing to these people. I ask you...do we have their consent to annex them? Do they believe it is in their best interest to be annexed to our great country? And what measures are we taking to fund a continued military presence to care for these people? If the Filipinos are not in support of this annexation, they will most assuredly fight us that will result in unnecessary violence and bloodshed of both American soldiers and Filipinos, whether you think them civilized or uncivilized. This is hypocritical to what we ourselves claim in our ideals expressed in our Declaration of Independence...the right to self govern. With this move of annexation are we not acting on the grounds of Imperialism which goes against our belief as a Republic? Are we conquerors, or are we liberators? I believe we should allow Aguinaldo, who we brought there from exile, to set up their own government and create a strong partnership that is agreeable for both the Philippines and the United States with mutual prosperity. Let us be the inspiration and model of their new venture and not force it upon them. This move will be viewed by eyes of other countries; it will impact their perception of our United States and the freedoms our nation…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spanish American War Dbq

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine fighting for freedom against a country that won’t listen to you and treats you with cruelty. You don’t have much military power, so this other, more powerful country helps you gain independance. However, as soon as you win, the country that helps turns around and puts you in the same situation, just with them instead of the original country. This is what it was like in the Philippines! Before the Spanish-American war, the Philippines were a territory of Spain, along with some other countries like Cuba and Puerto Rico. Spain mistreated the people of these territories. They moved them into camps, that had shelters with no roofs. If they didn’t get there in time, they were executed. The United States stepped in and went to war with Spain for the independance of these territories. When we won the war, we got control of these…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Situated to the southeast of the Xisha (China), are composed of more than reefs and shoals.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Author’s Purpose: Beveridge’s purpose in saying this was to persuade his intended audience that we should continue to control the Philippines. He makes a claim that is is our right to be there, according to God, and that Americans need to civilize that savages that live there.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using the Julian Go reading as my resource, a group who share a similar history as Filipinos are Puerto Ricans. Go highlights that both Philippines and Puerto Rico were both colonized by the Spaniards and was also eventually colonized by the United States. Both share the same struggles under American colonization, including both being termed as “unincorporated territories”. However, despite being similar in ways of colonization, Go also points out that Philippines received the more “lower end of the deal.” The United States saw Puerto Rico as more “deserving” than the Philippines because, unlike the Philippines, Puerto Rico welcomed the United States and their ideas of…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Imperialism

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages

    ISSUE #1: Manifest Destiny. Is overseas expansion, and therefore control of the Philippines, part of the inevitable manifest destiny of the United…

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Navy has operated both aircraft and naval vessels proclaiming the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. It is clearly seen by the US combat ship and flight over the Chinese construction at Fiery Reef. Along with the freedom of navigation, the United States emphasizes on strengthening it allies. The United States has a treaty obligation to the Philippines. Being the world’s largest economy, the United States has real interests in maintaining open sea lanes, and being the world’s biggest naval power makes it assumes the role of policing them. Moreover, being the hegemon, it frequently acts as a…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    South Chain Sea Case Study

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Considering the comprehensive national strength(economic production, the size of military, technology, etc.), it can be concluded that Vietnam, Philippines are not likely to become peer competitors, in other words, opponents to China on China South Sea. Though it seems like China is taking on most of Asia when it comes to its territorial claims, China’s military prowess in the region outnumbers most of its neighbors by a long shot( Florcruz). The relations between them are analyzed step by step as follows. On the one hand, the Chinese government does not admit South China Sea being in question but it does welcome Vietnam, Philippines to solve misunderstandings by bilateral dialog and negotiation. The Chinese government strongly holds the opinion that the dispute of South China Sea were ridiculous because the largest portion of territory( including all islands that Vietnam, Philippines claim as well), defined by the "nine-dash line indisputably belongs to China. On the other hand, Vietnam says it has actively ruled over both the Paracels and the Spratlys; both Philippines and China claim to the Scarborough Shoal(Q&A: South China Sea dispute). Why do they claim overlapping territory simultaneously? Because they rely on different sources and evidence to make their claims reasonable or…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The irony of the 1898 Spanish-American war was that Americans fought partly to aid Cubans in the fight for Cuban sovereignty, and the United States ended up colonizing some territories they won from Spain, like the Philippines. Despite America’s previous claims of only supporting independence and democracy, the United States became an imperialist power and colonized the Philippines (Introduction to the Spanish-American war and the Filipino insurgency in the assignment sheet). This led to a Filipino insurgency, led by discontent Filipinos, who fought American troops through guerrilla warfare (Conlin 545). Conlin states that many Americans died fighting against a “popular revolution” in the Philippines for independence (Conlin 545). Years ago, Americans were fighting for Cuban independence. During the Filipino insurgency, the United States fought to suppress anger among the Filipinos against American colonization of the Philippines. Americans justified colonizing the Philippines by arguing that Anglo-Saxons were superior to the Filipinos, Filipinos were incapable of sustaining a sovereignty, and a colony in the Philippines would benefit the United States economically.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Philippines had been fighting for their independence years before we took them over. “When we made allies of the Filipinos and armed them against Spain…” (Document D, Speech, Bryan) How could we, after arming the Philippines against Spain, take them over? They fought for their independence and right when they thought they got it, we took it again. They fought for their right to govern themselves. We had no right to take them…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Territories in South China by the sea -> the incident earlier this year was, in Gen. Myers opinion, were just to exert influence. China used to have…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What has more than 750 reefs and islands, has been claimed by 5 different countries, and has been the center of political disputes since the 1900s? Answer: the Spratly Islands, located off the coast of the Philippines and Malaysia. This region has been claimed by both of these nations as well as China, Vietnam, Brunei and Taiwan. Despite the political dilemma synonymous with them, the general American public is mostly unaware that these islands exist.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Spratly

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Spratly Islands dispute can be looked at from a variety of angles. In terms of national security, these islands are important due to their location in the South China Sea, where many merchant ships pass through to deliver goods, people, and energy products to Asian-Pacific countries. By controlling these islands, the country in question would be able to ensure the safe passage of their goods.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics