Preview

Why the Articles Of Confederation Failed

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
535 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the Articles Of Confederation Failed
The Articles of Confederation was America’s first constitution. It was adopted in 1777 by congress because there was a need for unity among the new states that were created as a result of the American Revolution. It put the largest share of power to the individual thirteen states in which each of them held "its sovereignty, freedom, and independence." Though the Articles of Confederation was made to create a "firm league of friendship" between and among the 13 states, there were a lot of reasons why it didn’t fulfill this and initially failed. One of the biggest mistakes that the Articles of Confederation brought about that led to its failure was that it placed power in the hands of the states. The reason why the founding fathers did this was because colonists were wary of a strong central government due to the way they had to deal with the British crown. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress would make decisions, but they had no power to enforce it since the states had the final decision. This made governing the states ineffective because a lack of central government. From the absence of a powerful, national government emerged a series of limitations that made the Articles of Confederation futile. Another crucial reason why the Articles of Confederation failed was because the National Government relied heavily on states to fund financial resources. Only the states, not Congress, had the authority to impose taxes and raise revenue; that means that Congress had to request for funds from the states. Unfortunately, this money was oftentimes not raised by the states or given to the national government long after it was due. Without the money they needed from the states, Congress was left unable to pay America’s debts and fulfill other tasks. The Articles of Confederation plunged the National Government into a financial crisis and left a disorganized economy that lacked the ability to pay for itself. The Articles of Confederation failed for many

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws within it; it made the States more independent but the federal government have very limited control. They weren't allowed to make trade treaties, or allowed to tax which resulted in them not being able to pay their debts. The Constitution was made to tighten up the Articles and set a standard within the States. “ All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” (A-3) This is what caused a change, and tightened up the government. The government had 3 branches now, each with its own responsibilities and neither was more powerful than the other. The legislative had the power to create a new currency…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it provided an outline to how future government should be formed, The Articles of Confederation did not provide America with an effective government from 1781 to 1789. Nicknamed “The Articles of Confusion”, The Articles of Confederation lacked stability and the power to truly govern the states. Under the articles there was no executive branch and no way for the federal government to raise money.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with this was the amount of certainty on certain issues, which was virtually nonexistent. Since the federal government couldn't do much of anything, it was up to the states to decide, and what was good for one state wasn't necessarily good for all states, so nothing could build up and actually happen with that system. For example, document A describes the decision making on imposting trade, which wouldn't be fair because some states have trading as their only source of income. In this aspect, the Articles of Confederation did quite the opposite of making the government more effective; all they did was take away authority. The Articles not only took away authority, but made it nearly impossible to get anything completed, especially because all 13 states had to unanimously agree on the proposed bill, etc. Also, of the authorities that the federal government did have, there was no way for them to enforce…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Articles were the first constitutional agreement made between the 13 American states. They kept the United States together long enough to realize unity. Its goal was to establish a written document of the functions of the national government after declaring independence from Great Britain. The Articles of Confederation were not successful for many reasons. It established a weak central government with no president. The government was ran by the thirteen individual states themselves. They controlled their own foreign policy. Another reason the Articles of Confederation were not successful was because they gave the national government no power of direct taxation. This was a bad decision because governments get their money from taxes. Without taxes, the government did not have any money and would not be able to run…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people tend to think that the reign of the Articles of Confederation were a complete waste of almost ten years and to some extent, they are right. The confederation style of government has many weaknesses. The Articles of Confederation gave sovereign power to each of states to rule themselves that isn't always a bad thing but take into effect the states history, they couldn't agree on anything. It was hard for them to become unified while they were fighting for their independence in the American Revolution. After the states won their independence they had to set up a government, and of course they didn't want it to be anything like the British so the central government was severely lacking in power, among other things. Under the Articles of Confederation The Congress had no power to levy taxes or tariffs; that makes for a ruthless shortage of money the only way it could gain funds was ask the states for money most of those requests were ignored or only partially met. Speaking of money, the congress did have the right to print its own currency, but so did the states. "One ground of discontent in the army" was the slowness of congress to pay their…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation kept the central government weak due to the colonists’ fear of a tyrannical central government. Congress did not have the power to regulate international of interstate trade. This was a significant weakness. International trade is a crucial part to…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Articles of Confederation did have some achievements like bringing peace and unity, they were more ineffective than effective for providing a stable government for the United States. The Articles of Confederation were ineffective for these reasons. First, The Articles of Confederation did not allow Congress to impose a tax, so this prevented the new nation of the United States of America to have a strong economic system. Second, The Articles of Confederation prevented the Chief Executive (President) from having any power and thus also having no military. Lastly, The Articles of Confederation didn’t allow the United States to have very good foreign relations with any foreign nation since we were viewed as weak.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Articles of Confederation made ways to treat citizens fairly and drastically reduce taxing. Britain had imposed massive taxes on the colonies that did not involve them in any way, due to the fact that the taxes had to do with events happening in England and had no effect on the colonies. But as a territory of the British Empire they had to pay the British monarchy anyway. The newly independent states wanted to change this unfair form of taxing as much as possible, thus they created a law so Congress could not tax citizens directly and is so stated in Article nine in the Articles of Confederation. They had only the power to request money from the states. Also, people at the time had already helped with the expenses of the Revolutionary War and were in debt. They could not pay back taxes or debts to the government if they just collected money from them and left them with nothing. So the articles were made to not allow Congress to collect any debts from the states and this was also stated in…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout these few years, the lack of a central government seemed to be an overwhelming factor when it comes to the effectiveness of this document. A large fault in the Articles is the inability of Congress to create taxes and regulate trade. There is simply no way that a central government can survive without taxes. Also, since the government had no authority over the colonies, they could not force anyone to contribute to the overwhelming war debt caused by the American Revolution. And without their ability to control the colonies, there is no central government. Also, the difficulty to make amendments to the Articles made it almost impossible for anything new to be put into action. With so many different ideals coming from the different parts of the nation, the Articles lacked in that it called for a nine-state majority to make amendments. It seems nearly impractical to try and acquire nine completely different states to agree on one topic, seeing they came from different parts of the country, and thus, making Congress close to nothing. And finally, if the U.S. were to be attacked by Britain again at this time, there would be no way for them to defend themselves, seeing that Congress could only ask states for troops, but could not raise an army. This would have been catastrophic if another country had decided to attack the U.S. for any reason. To sum that up, the inability to create taxes and trade regulations, the difficulty to make amendments, and the inability to rise up an army contributed to the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Articles of Confederation provided the first “U.S. Constitution” in 1777, by the First Continental Congress. This agreement was drafted during the Revolutionary War between thirteen states in America thereby granting sovereign power to each individual state (Articles of Confederation, n.d.). Instead of separation of powers between an executive, legislative, and judicial branch of government, this agreement offered a committee of…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were very ineffective because it didn’t give the Federal government enough power, they couldn’t enact tariffs and each state did what was in the best interest of its own state not what was best for the country as a whole. The Articles of Confederation was more of a league of friendship than an actual government. The mere fact that it took four years to ratify should have warned the country of its shortcomings. It was very difficult to amend the Articles because a unanimous vote from each state. Under the Articles of Confederation, there wasn’t even a national currency.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of main reason is the fact that they gave way too much power to the state governments. States could issue their own paper money which would eventually ruin the economy. There was no National army or navy leaving the country basically defenseless in the event of war. States could also make their own laws without the requirement of permission from the central government. This meant that a state didn’t have to follow the national governments laws. The Articles of confederation were worthless in enforcing good interstate relations, congress wasn’t given the authority to regulate interstate trade. As a result states with commercial advantages abused their power and interstate trade wars were developed. The articles didn’t help with our image as a country either. Other countries and foreign nations didn’t want to trade or make deals with us because our national government appeared to be unstable and weak, which it was. They also led the national government to bankruptcy, states weren’t obligated to pay taxes and could offer money and make deals. The government was only losing money and running out of resources; bankruptcy was inevitable. Lastly a national court system was…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays