Preview

Why Should Countries Use Nuclear Energy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should Countries Use Nuclear Energy
Recent studies have shown, that it is possible that the demand for electricity could increase from 370 terawatt hours in 2010 to 470 terawatts hours by 2030 (Friends). In light of this, one of the many energy resources that countries will use to keep up with these demands is nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is the use of uranium that has been turned into fuel and put through reactors to generate energy, and is used to generate a large portion of the energy used around the world. But, nuclear energy is not as good as it sounds, countries should stop using nuclear energy and start using renewable energy because nuclear energy costs billions of dollars every year to build plants and maintain them, there is no where to deposit the nuclear waste, …show more content…
Nuclear energy creates waste from the uranium that is used, it cannot be thrown away and the waste goes through many things before it is even safe to store it. The process of waste is more frequent than some might think; every two years a third of the uranium core in the reactors must be replaced and since the waste cannot be deposited it must be placed in a dry cask, but before it is ready it must sit in a cooling tank for 5 years until it is cold enough to be placed in the cask (Stockton). This step that comes with the use of nuclear energy, is a process that would be unnecessary if countries were to start using renewable energy because the resources used can be deposited and are not harmful to the environment. Also, having to replace, cool, and dry caste waste brings in extra carbon dioxide into the atmosphere because more uranium must be mined, more the energy the plant is making is wasted on powering the cooling tanks for 5 years non stop, and also costing even more money buying or building the casts and to buy somewhere to store all of the casts after the cooled uranium is put into …show more content…
It has been shown, that the 99 reactors in the United states account for 60 percent of our carbon free electricity (Alexander). This is an important factor to many, especially knowing that the United States alone uses and creates a large portion of the electricity generated around the world. On the other hand, many find that carbon free energy does not actually exist. In fact, a large nuclear energy plant can make up to 250,000 tons of carbon dioxide every year, many steps in the process of creating nuclear energy like, mining uranium ore, refining and enriching fuel, building the plant, and operating it are all part of the release of large amounts of carbon dioxide (Clayton). Although, the carbon production from operating the plant is very little and is advertised as carbon free, many fail to inform people of the carbon production before the plant even starts running. For example, mining uranium ore, refining and enriching the fuel, as well as building the plants creates large amounts of carbon to be released into the atmosphere. Even though carbon free energy is most likely not possible right now, many of the renewable energy options only release small amounts of carbon into the air when they are being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear energy has persisted to be an especially controversial topic due to issues concerning safety, efficiency, and cost. The very word, “nuclear” prompts the public to think of nuclear bombs. However, it may be possible for nuclear energy to be a feasible substitute to our existing energy sources.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world where technology and advancements has flourished, majority comes to one main source to run on… Energy. There is several alternative methods on producing energy, some more efficient or safer than others. The most common and traditional source of energy in today's world is coal power, but other alternatives do exist such as that of natural gas, solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is the 3rd most common source of our energy. Nuclear energy was first introduced in 1954 in Russia with the first power plant. Nuclear energy provides about 20% of today's electricity and does provide a substantial amount of energy, but does provide threats of radioactivity.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear energy leads to an unsafe, unstable and unclean environment. The producing of nuclear energy can lead to both good and bad things, but two thing that come with producing nuclear energy are the high dangers and expenses. Many risks and high dangers of producing nuclear energy are any where from health issues to major meltdowns of nuclear plants. Expenses of nuclear energy plants are very expensive to build and to sustain them through the years. Renewable energy is a safer option for the environment and the economy, with no chances of major melt downs and expenses.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today there are so many countries and governments that have realized that nuclear energy is the only way to significantly decrease their emissions. The world economy is producing greenhouse emissions at the…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The chemical reaction that creates nuclear power is known as nuclear fission. When uranium is blasted with fast-moving atoms known as neutrinos, they become unstable and split, releasing more fast-moving neutrinos and energy in the form of radiation (Redd). When nuclear fission occurs, there are byproducts of the fuel known as fission products. Fission products are highly radioactive and will be such for thousands of years. The current method of disposal is storage in water to shield the outside world from the radiation until it decays enough to be stored deep within the Earth. Other methods include the recycling and transmutation of waste into other products and the incineration of waste within the Sun (Touran). Although it may seem that nuclear energy isn’t safe for the environment, it is exponentially cleaner than current fossil fuels. By 2013, it has on average prevented 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas and 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths (Hansen and Pushker). With the replacement of fossil fuels as an energy source, this number can only…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although using renewable energy sounds like a great idea, several people argue that renewables are not green, nor are they sustainable. The only way it’s even possible for renewable energy to contribute to production is by taking up vast amounts of land which in return will cause more damage. In order to truly go green, the best solution would be to use nuclear power instead. Not only does it generate large amounts of powers, it takes up a much smaller amount of land. Personally, I agree. This will help shrink our society’s energy system and reduce costs for everyone.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With all these pros, there are still cons about nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants generate large amounts of highly radioactive material. This is from the leftovers, after splitting the uranium atom. You can argue that nuclear waste is a bad thing, but if it is taken care of properly it is not so bad. The highly radioactive rods are kept in cooling pools of water, which not only cools the rods down, but…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Besides environment and reliability, nuclear energy has more efficiency than burning fossil fuels. It has high energy density viruses to fossil fuels (“Nuclear Energy”, n.d.). To illustrate, a gram of uranium releases an amount of energy much more than a gram of coal or oil; approximately eight thousand times(Parker, 2010). However, that is also excellent for the environment because if the electricity -which is produced by nuclear power- produced by using the coal, will generate 147 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (Nuclear Power Institute,…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Us Nuclar Power Plants

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Energy is a controversial topic in the United States and the rest of the world. More than half of the energy we have comes from coal burning power plants. President Obama is working along with government agencies to build more nuclear power plants in the United States. Nuclear power plants produce large quantities of energy creating no air pollution and very little water pollution in the form of thermal pollution. The United States should build more Nuclear power plants, they are good for the environment unlike coal burning power plants which are major producer of carbon dioxide and contributor of mercury in our waterways; they produce a lot of energy, they don’t produce any air pollution or greenhouse gases, and the little pollution they create can be safely stored and carefully contained.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays