Preview

Why Should Animal Testing Be Abolished?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should Animal Testing Be Abolished?
Animal testings should be abolished since they are another form of brutal animal abuse, aren’t accurate due to difference in human and animal DNAs and are no longer necessary with the presence of new technology resulting better outcomes. It is in fact one of the most misunderstood concepts in modern science. According to Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) the number has increased to more than 72% of the people opposing Animal Testing but some still support Animal Testing believing that it serves it’s main purpose and that it is beneficial enough to ignore the cruel act. But statistics and evidences prove this point of view very wrong.

Animal Testing labs are one of the blind spots of Animal Abuse, with no laws protecting
…show more content…
There are now options that are even more effective and efficient compared to Animal Testing. Mainly because Animal Testings rely on animals that are as mentioned previously, very different from humans. A few of the beneficial technologies are Silico Modeling and Chemosynthetic Livers. Silico Modeling is a computer simulation developed through decades of technology breakthroughs which has now reached the level of emulating biological reactions. They can be used instead of animals for drug developments, chemical testings and disease researches. Quoting cellular molecular biologist Amy Clippinger, from PETA “Computer models...have saved millions of animals from suffering in toxicity testing experiments”. Second example of new advancements in technology that should reduce the amount of Animal Testings is the Chemosynthetic Liver. Chief scientific officer of the Clinical Intelligence company Empiriko Mukund Chorghade created this chemical compound that creates accurate results with less confusion and economic waste. This piece of technology helps generates metabolic products that were only a gist in the past using Animal Testing are now explored with a new clarity. Mr. Chorghade says, “We can give you very accurate structural data, nothing is left to guess work.” There is already a successful sample trial made where this program identified a metabolite that …show more content…
Instead facilities made for testing purposes should use other options including Silico Modelings, Chemosynthetic Livers and Organs on Chips. There are endless possibilities of new advances in Science by walking out of our comfort zones or the methods we are used to and go for new innovations that are happening around

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, technology has replaced the need for almost all types of animal experimentation. These alternative testing methods are producing more efficient results and are eliminating the horrors and inhumanity associated with traditional animal testing. Many people are rejecting alternative methods because they are new and unorthodox. However, alternative methods of testing do not mean putting humans at risk. They do not mean putting a halt on medical progress. Rather, non-animal testing will greatly improve the quality and humaneness of our toxicity testing and drug…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, animal testing is erroneous because it does not contribute anything meaningfully to the world. When animals are tested often the results are irrelevant, due to the fact, animals have many differences from humans. Also, the animals endure poor conditions. Lastly, the animals’ lives are wasted by being tested on products that are not important. Testing animals is abusive and needs to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sally Porter

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States fir various types of testing. These animals are used for scientific and commercial testing to develop medical treatments, determine toxicity of medications and chemicals, check the safety of products destined for human use and other biomedical or healthcare purposes. This testing on animals is cruel, inhumane and should be banned. It should be banned because the animals are held and live in inhumane conditions, it is harmful and at times lethal to the animals and there are other research method available that do not require animal testing.…

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a cruel and ineffective medical practice that produces unreliable results that should be illegal and those laboratories should use safer alternatives that will provide more accurate results.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unethical Animal Testing

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Experiments on animals are cruel and expensive. New scientists are developing methods that replace animals. The tests use human cells and tissue (known as in-vitro methods), computer modeling techniques (known as in-silico methods), and studies with human volunteers. The new experiments take less time and money to complete.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For instance more than 90 percent of drugs and products that are approved fail when consumed by humans (Casey). This is because experiments done on animals have no relevance to human life at all. New technology like In Vitro has recently surfaced that could make the use of animals no more.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It might not be efficient at testing medicine because you will want to see how it affects human organs but you can also grow cells which is a lot more expensive but you can selectively choose what cells you want to grow like liver or muscle cells of anything. With this possibility the only reason to keep animal testing would be because of greed. “skin corrosivity and irritation can be easily measured using three-dimensional human skin equivalent systems such as EpiDerm and SkinEthic. Additional alternatives include EpiSkin (a model of reconstructed human epithelium) and a variety of sophisticated, computer-based Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models that predict skin corrosivity and irritation by means of correlating a new drug or chemical with its likely activity, properties, and effects with classification accuracy between 90 and 95 percent”(NEAVS,…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal testing has always been a dispute between people; some people think it’s morally wrong and some people think it helps with medical and scientific breakthroughs. Drugs that people use or cosmetics that are used could have been tested through animals before being stocked on shelves. About 800 animals are tested on before a drug is passed to clinical trials (“Is animal”). Many animals get tested on, but many like mice, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, dogs, cats, pigs, and some other animals get tested on. Animals can be used to find new advances in medical treatment and check safety for products, but these animals that get tested on can go through pain and death. Animal testing is wrong and should be stopped because…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Researchers need to test medicine using advanced technology not on animals. All researchers around the world need to find a safer more accurate way to test medication. If researchers keep using animals, their results will always be different for humans and they will never find a solution that will help people with their health. There are ways to test medication that are safer, faster, and cheaper than animal testing. If researchers use the technology animal testing will be eliminated from…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a very disagreeable process that should not be allowed. Animals should be treated with the same respect as humans. Animals have feelings and organs and bodies just like us. They feel every bit of pain they endure. Why should these innocent animals be tested its unethical, wasteful, and they have rights just like humans.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine walking into a small lab in United states. You hear Dogs howling and monkeys screaming of fear. You see mice scattering in circles in a small cage and rabbits hiding in a corner. You see chemicals and special tools laid all over tables. You can see This is what an animal testing lab would look like. Each year more than 100 million animals-including mice, rats frogs, pigs, birds, monkeys, fish, cats, rabbits and more die from animal testing. Although no one will want to test on a real, human body, people can test on other things. With it being 2017, we have a lot of technology, and engineers could make a new technology so scientists could use those and leave animals out of the picture.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Testing on animals is like testing on your baby sister, it is wrong and inhumane. “But precisely because our way of life depends on exploiting them, animals don’t really have any significant “rights” in America, although Congress passed the Humane Methods of Slaughter Action of 1958 (Motavalli 26).” Animals in America should have just as many rights as humans, the Human Methods of…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientist have found a way to collect better results by using human cells instead of animals’. Since the products are used on humans, why not use human cells? For example, in glass testing, studying cell cultures in a Petri dish, can produce better results than testing animals because human cells would be tested (Rogers). Using the Petri dish to better study human cells is worthwhile. Some scientists use chemicals when working with the animals, but in result the outcome is not as accurate as it can be if the scientists used human skin cells. Artificial human skin is made with sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells. This process gives more useful results than testing chemicals on animals (Rogers; Watts; Axonn News Agency). Lastly, evidence shows that the new form of testing can predict the toxicity levels of products without performing acts on the animals that can lead to injuries. Microfluidic chips, organs on a chip, which are lined with human cells and recreate the functions of human organs, are in very advanced stages of development. These computers will be able to predict the toxicity of substances without cruel testing on the animals (Watts). Many people may argue that as useful as it can be to study the cultural cells, it also takes away the opportunity to study the interrelated systems,…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abolish Animal Testing

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Animal testing is a hot topic now days. Though it may not be well known, animal protection did not start until the 1800’s. The United State Department of Agricultural (USDA) issued a law in 1966 to protect certain animals against animal cruelty and neglect. This law does not protect rodents, reptiles, and/or birds. While these animals are being tested on, no matter how painful the procedure is, the scientist does not have to give them pain relief (medication) of any sort. Animals are used for many different things such as; to test make up, medications, and many other human products. Using an animal as a test subject, and not giving them pain relief, is the same thing as starving or beating an animal. It is illegal to torture animals, punishable by law if caught torturing or purposefully neglecting ANY animal, but it is perfectly legal for scientist to use animals as test subjects and not give them any kind of medications to relieve the pain they have to endure. The law that the USDA passed should declare all animals/species will receive the appropriate form of medication in the instance that the test being preformed is harmful to the animal.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics