Preview

Why Is Napoleon War Important

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1048 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Napoleon War Important
The Napoleonic wars remains to be one of the most significant and influential periods in history, an era where the concept of the decisive battle the causes of which bear a great importance in the further evolution and later development of warfare and which resulted in a dramatic shift in the international relations in Europe. This essay will analyse the sole driving factor in the inception of the battles which is the factor of Napoleon’s unique and formidable personality. However, it could be argued that the underlying reasons behind this lie in forces beyond Bonaparte’s control. MAKE INTO ACTUAL SENTENCE Such factors include old regime rivalries, the hostile climate of warfare as brought about by the French revolution, which in turn left a foreign policy legacy with incomplete ambitions and forced Napoleon to carry it out. This essay will take a thematic approach rather than a chronology of battles. Context of French revolution napoleon’s
One explanation as to why Napoleon fought so many battles is that he did not have a coherent grand strategy compelled Napoleon to continuously fight battles as he had no concrete foreign policy objectives – rather, war was his objective. Those who affirm this view includes …show more content…
This is further evidence that it was Napoleon’s personality which catalysed a number of battles during this period. Therefore, Napoleonic foreign policy can be interpreted as being driven by an illogical lust to carry out an endless string of wars, the final aim being either an irrational quest of world domination or simply perpetuating war
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Annotated Bibliography On Jeremy Black
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography On Jeremy Black

    Philip Mansel is a historian educated at Eton College, where he was a King’s Scholar, and at Balliol College, Oxford, where he read Modern History and Modern Languages. Mansel argues Napoleon brought Europe into the pinnacle of monarchism. Mansel states the Napoleon’s act of overthrowing historic republics and installing family members on newly created thrones changed European politics and government. Mansel objectively dissects Napoleon’s policies without taking sides. He states Napoleon’s methods and significance, does not state whether the policies are right or wrong. This is a valuable source for illustrating Napoleon’s short term impact on government and politics in the Napoleonic Era.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Von Clausewitz: Similarities And Differences
    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Von Clausewitz: Similarities And Differences

    Jomini when describing the principles of war he makes the argument that “To throw by strategic movement the mass of an army, successively, upon the decisive point of a theater of war…” (Jomini, pg70). Clausewitz makes it clear that war is serious and therefore a country cannot limit their war effort saying, “He who uses his forces ruthlessly, shrinking from no amount of bloodshed must gain an advantage if his adversary does not do the same,” (Clausewitz pg 265). Both of these men learned many of ideas of military success came from the Napoleonic wars. The French under Napoleon’s regime shows the way in which a population that practices total war principles, an army in mass and ruthless no prisoners policy, would be able to defeat any army that does not also practice this same mentality. Napoleon incorporated both the ideas of strategic movement with those of principles of ruthless military campaign.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Response Final
    • 1102 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napoleon Response Final

    The are two sides to every story. The French Revolution brought significant change to France during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. It was a period of time that produced a remodeling of the French Government system, an Enlightened mindset, and the rise of a new prominent ruler, Napoleon Bonaparte. Emperor Napoleon, as he so deemed himself, initially took on his duties by trying to bring together what had been a much divided nation. He made concessions with both the left (the constitutionalists) and the right (the monarchists). His concessions earned him respect from many, however, as his power grew and grew, Napoleon developed a tendency to rely strongly on his military to gain power. His militaristic eagerness to monopolize Europe earned him much respect and praise from the French people, but very infrequently do we recognize those individuals that served in the military to carry through Napoleon’s aggressive orders. Those who fought for Napoleon’s success received very little in return; much to lack of motivation. Fortunately for the world, Jakob Walter’s story as a conscript for Napoleon’s Grand Army has been public for the world. His powerful accounts of the pitiful conditions that conscripts endured during their wartime travels would give many a different opinion of the “Great” Napoleon. As mentioned earlier, there are two sides to every story.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Betrayer Of The French Revolution
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Betrayer Of The French Revolution

    There has not been a man so widely interpreted as Napoleon in European history. His early heroic reputation is questioned because of other dictators who went down the same path as he did but for other reasons, such as Stalin and Mussolini. The French Revolution had three goals, liberty, equality, and fraternity, and to make it truly successful these goals must be achieved. Freeing the French, making them equal within themselves, and unifying them, is what Emperor Bonaparte strived for with the Napoleonic Code. Although most believe he did not acquire Liberty, they are content with his achievements. Napoleon not only finished the revolution, he finished with what everyone expected, the demise of the King and the equality among all people. Napoleon truly is "the debate…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Flyer project
    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page

    Flyer project

    When Napoleon started feeling really confident and powerful than ever, he kept wanting more. Napoleon caused much damaged to many, giving him the bad reputation that he began to gain, and mainly, his way on toward his downfall. First, is when he wanted to invade the UK and defeat the Royal Navy at sea, which he never accomplished. Then eventually he had the European nation under his thumb, which led to a very large debt. Food imports in Britain dropped, and mainly food prices increased. Second, Napoleon decided to take over and invade Russia, which was a big mistake because Russia defeated the French Army…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Was The Reason For Napoleon's Success
    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Was The Reason For Napoleon's Success

    Another major factor as to why the French force was successful during this time period was the quality of its soldiers, most important trait being the high moral and belief in the idea of both the French Republic and Napoleon. The command, control and organization of the army was a vital asset into explaining its’ success during this time. Societal factors are also apparent when evaluating the reasons for success of Napoleon’s force during these wars. Adoption of conscription and the development of the doctrine of total war would mean that war involved the entire of a nation’s society. The most important factor however would be the individual leadership qualities of Napoleon himself, being able to use the other factors together in order to obtain the victories during the first five coalition wars. Nevertheless French success can also be credited to the failure of the coalition powers in the majority of these factors and the lack their lack of military…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Napoleonic Art Analysis
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napoleonic Art Analysis

    Napoleon viewed himself as an ambitious and a strong leader. He represented himself as a supreme leader ready to conquer and achieve higher goals for himself and France. this essay explains about this Napoleonic Art. In which I would be describing about its setting, Napoleon’s clothing, actions, and items with symbolic meaning. Furthermore, who painted this painting, his expression, other people in the painting and interesting facts.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon's Domestic Achievements
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Napoleon's Domestic Achievements

    Throughout time, the history of Napoleon is retold over and over again. His conquests of Europe are legendary. He is considered one of the greatest military leaders, his victories are widely known, yet people seem to forget his losses. Napoleon had many domestic and diplomatic/military achievements, some were great and others were his worst blunders.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Napoleonic Decisive Battle Analysis
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Napoleonic Decisive Battle Analysis

    It took the USA 4 years to win the Civil War because of the changing nature of warfare. This meant that Napoleonic decisive battle could no longer be applied and so their strategy had to change. The changing nature of warfare was the most important factor in the war going on for as long as it did, making it more significant than the poor initial US strategy, the contributions of Lee, and the strengths of the CSA at the beginning of the war.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humanities Study Guide
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humanities Study Guide

    Napoleon's Empire: His influence…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte, a Man of War
    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte, a Man of War

    Napoleon Bonaparte rise to power was because of his strong army he formed and his strategy for winning wars however his fall came when he went to Russia intending to defeat them but lost. Napoleon’s policies were to ensure freedom and equality for the people and to give the people the education they needed.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    War of 1812
    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War of 1812

    Are you sitting comfortably? The constantly changing fashionable take on war of 1812 demonstrates the depth of the subject. Though war of 1812 is a favourite topic of discussion amongst monarchs, presidents and dictators, war of 1812 is not given the credit if deserves for inspiring many of the worlds famous painters. Crossing many cultural barriers it still draws remarks such as 'I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole' and 'i'd rather eat wasps' from the easily lead, trapped by their infamous history. Though I would rather be in bed I will now examine the primary causes of war of 1812.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Purchase
    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purchase

    Napoleon wanted to consolidate his resources so that he could focus on conquering England. Believing he lacked the troops and materials to wage an effective war, the French general wished…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Is Napoleon Bonaparte A Villain
    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages

    How Is Napoleon Bonaparte A Villain

    He wanted to be the new Alexander the Great and conquer the entire world like Alexander the Great, his exploits were blurred by the permanent frustration. Napoleon's work, which essentially freed the workforce, is the hallmark of the victory of the bourgeoisie class and it can be summarized in one of his statements: "If I had had time, would soon formed one people, each at travel everywhere, there would always be found in their common country.” This was his Unitarian vision of Europe, perhaps the major fascination exercised over Europe figure as diverse historic-graphical and cultural importance, ignoring its national peculiarities uniformity otherwise subject to imperialist aegis of…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why did it take so long for the nations of Europe to defeat Napoleon I?
    • 759 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why did it take so long for the nations of Europe to defeat Napoleon I?

    Napoleon had been working hard in building a powerful and great empire ever since the beginning of his rule as Emperor in 1804. Since before that time he had managed to expand French territory into Italy, he had annexed the Austrian Netherlands, The German States, the Batavian Republic, later on he annexed parts of Egypt, and Parts of Spain. It was because of this hugely successful foreign policy and France's revolutionary background that the Nations of Europe, particularly Britain, Austria and Russia, felt threatened. France was considered such a huge threat because of the revolution it had carried out and the changes it was imposing on the countries that Napoleon successfully annexed, it was a threat to the monarchy as a system, and because of that France was the number one enemy in Europe at the time.…

    • 759 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics