Preview

Why Is Louis Xiv The Greatest King

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
248 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Louis Xiv The Greatest King
Louis XIV of France is the one of the greatest kings in the world for diverse reasons.
The initial reason is that he is the Europe's longest reigning monarch. Accidentally, he became the king of France when he just turned into five. That innocent king was so young to rule the country at that time. So his mother served as his regent until he grew enough to undertake this immense duty. France was under his reign for 72 years after his death in 1715.
Aside from the first reason, he had contributed in several parts of France's regime. He wished his country was the center of Europe. The emperor started using an absolute monarchy in his country in order to suppress the groups of revolting noble. He also considered on agriculture by encouraging farmers
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolute Monarchs: Louis 14th And Peter The Great
    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolute Monarchs: Louis 14th And Peter The Great

    An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Louis Xiv So Difficult To Rule
    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is Louis Xiv So Difficult To Rule

    1 Sarah Seng History 130 Chapter 15 Summary April 23, 2018 This chapter beings with a tale about the Marquis of Canillac who did not have a good reputation in the land. Because of his reign, he was able to collect taxes on special occasions, but abused this privilege by collecting taxes annually. This ruler was influenced by Louis XIV and his extremely long reign.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Louis Xiv Effective
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is Louis Xiv Effective

    Want an effective leader? Then Louis XIV would not be a great choice. I believe he is an ineffective leader because of a few reasons; one, he lost all four wars that he placed wages on, leading France to bankruptcy. Two, he failed at his goal of becoming the master of Europe. And third, because protestants would not convert to Catholicism, he threatened to kick them out if they didn’t convert or execute them if they stayed, because they left, the businesses they owned and ran, left with them. In fact, I thought Louis XIV was effective at one point because he was very smart about something; he built Versailles and paid the nobles well to live…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Are The Similarities Between The Han And Ming Dynasty
    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Are The Similarities Between The Han And Ming Dynasty

    They also followed confucianism, which caused the dynasty to have good leadership and morals. Their economy was excellent, and farming was important. A strong military helped them beat…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What did Louis XIV hope to accomplish in his domestic and foreign policies?
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What did Louis XIV hope to accomplish in his domestic and foreign policies?

    Louis XIV strove vigorously for supremacy in foreign affairs. He was to use his foreign policy to establish a universal monarchy for himself or alternatively to use it to secure natural frontiers for France thus improving its defenses. He worked successfully to create an absolutist and centralized state. During his reign Louis was involved in four major wars, some of which Louis may be accountable as the provocateur; however, I believe that mainly his motives were purely defensive. The war of Devolution served as a pretext which nettled him part of Flanders, although the Dutch then moved against him with the Triple Alliance. Louis was determined to crush Holland and this began the third of the Dutch wars, which depleted his treasury. Louis proved an incredibly extravagant spender, dispensing huge sums of money to finance the royal court. The following ten years the king limited his policies to diplomacy. Louis continued the nobility's exemption from taxes but forced its member into financial dependence to the crown and the provincial nobles also lost political power. Louis does have a genuine concern for his country and despite his dubious methods he does manage to secure the territories that he wishes to secure. He curtailed local authorities and created specialized ministries. Louis's grandson retained the Spanish throne but the war of Spanish Succession left France in great debt and a weakened military. Louis used the bourgeoisie to build his centralized bureaucracy. He illustrated new administrative methods to make him more in control. Louis's general Colbert worked to improve the French economy. Colbert worked to create a favorable balance of trade and increase France's colonial holdings. He achieved a reputation for his work of improving the state of French manufacturing and bringing the economy back from the brink of bankruptcy. He reduced the national debt through more efficient taxation. His principal taxation devices included the aides, the douanes, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Louis Xiv Succeed By One King One Faith
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Louis Xiv Succeed By One King One Faith

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Qin Dynasty Research Paper
    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Qin Dynasty Research Paper

    In my mind, the Emperor lived as a model and many of its methods remained applied (without that we convince officially). For me, the authoritarian tendency, joined to the humanitarian government preached by Confucius (too utopian in its precepts), allowed a policy to become viable in a period marked by an unknown future. So at the end of his reign, the political philosophy was defined in its main lines. And this policy and these legacies prevailed in China until the dawn of XX e…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Louis XIV's reign
    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analyzing Louis XIV's reign

    Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Louis XIV, of France, in comparison with the Stuart Kings, of England.
    • 1005 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Louis XIV, of France, in comparison with the Stuart Kings, of England.

    William Jefferson Clinton was one of the greatest presidents to govern the United States as opposed to the Bush's. Clinton proved to the world our preeminence by way of control, economic growth, and policies ranging from Israel to social security. The Bush's proved to the world that they won the election. Louis XIV and the Stuart Kings also compare in similar ways. Louis XIV was a sound leader whose foresight and character led to the greatness of France, along with delegating authority to great economic and military leaders. The Stuart Kings possessed no foresight or character, many thought of them as stupid and stubborn, and the way they governed their country was reckless. Louis XIV prospered through absolute control, economic growth, and military reform. Where as, the Stuart Kings failure was due to no real control, economic turmoil, and civil war. The most important factor in the success of Louis XIV and the failure of the Stuart Kings was control.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The First Emperor Of China And Augustus Caesar
    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The First Emperor Of China And Augustus Caesar

    Augustus believed that power must be spread out and democracy should be the best form of government. He, “transferred the republic from my own control to the will of the senate and the Roman people” (Res Gestae 34). This gave the people more power to influence laws and made them feel more involved in Rome, in return his people were happier about how he ruled his kingdom. The First emperor of China was the only person who made decisions in china. Any rule or law passed was due to direct order from himself. This would often lead to misjudgment and unjust laws. “The First Emperor was greedy and short-sighted, confident in his own wisdom, never trusting his meritorious officials, never getting to know his people” (Sima Qian 8). He did not care about his people and would only look to better himself. This self-centered leadership resulted in hated for the emperor and many failed assassination attempts on…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap World History Chapter 8 Notes
    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ap World History Chapter 8 Notes

    Expeditions consumed the empire's surplus a. Raised taxes and confiscated land of some wealthy individuals b. Taxes and land confiscations discouraged investment in manufacture and trade 2. Social tensions, caused by class systems between the poor and rich 3. Problems of land distribution 4. The reign of Wang Mang (9-23 C.E.) a. Land reforms by the "socialist emperor" b. Overthrown by revolts, 23 C.E. Ian Cabalo October 2012 Period Two AP World History Unit 2: Chapter 8: The Unification of China…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Legalism Han Feizi: The Mandate Of Rule In China
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Legalism Han Feizi: The Mandate Of Rule In China

    Also the King was the son of Heaven according to China and as long as he governed his people well, Heaven gave him the right to rule. Unless he didn't govern well, the Heaven would send signs of its displeasure, such as earthquakes and floodsThis all made the Chinese leaders start to think and to ask questions about the best way to keep order in society. After a lot of thinking, they came…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty Legacy
    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Han Dynasty Legacy

    The early Han Dynasty was ruled by Liu Bang. The Han also saw extreme cultural developments with confucianism which was compressed which had been minimized by Qin Dynasty. The Han Dynasty had a centralized government which was highly liked and ruled with dignity for about 400 years, ruling less than the Qin Dynasty. Than Han Dynasty was truly for the people doing everything as a government to see their people prosper giving tax breaks, hosting events and also exceeding research of human care. Early Han rulers expanded their empire almost to the size of modern China. Chinese society had an exceptional foundation. The emperor was at the top and a large body of officials reached down to the village. Han government replaced emphasis on legalism with confucianism created the civil service system. The qualifications required scholars to take an exam to serve as government officials under the empire, based on confusion leader, who should be chosen based on their ability. Under Han rule, Chinese developed their first golden age, the Pax Sinica. Other achievements were advancing the production of paper, chinese became very wealthy through trade, developed a monopoly on the production of slope. A golden age where there is peace and prosperity meaning wealth. During golden ages, civilizations developed achievements and discoveries. During this period, Chinese invented many inventions. Chinese also improved farming by creating a new tubulated plow. This change is important because the number of Chinese people have grown greatly. The Han emperors told their people farming is important work.The Han people were very aggressive and usually having full control over the mining of salt and the making of…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Confucianism In The Han Dynasty
    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of Confucianism In The Han Dynasty

    He answered directly to Heaven and indirectly answerable to the his people. If the emperor and the government failed to do things responsibly, mistreated the people or abused power, their authority to rule could be withdrawn. Some of the signs that Heaven had withdrawn its royal mandate included natural disasters such as storms, floods, and earthquakes. It was reinforced by Confucianism and its teachings, a social, moral and philosophical code for many ages. Being simply a guide to personal behavior and success, and was a very effective government.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Male-Only Voting Rights In The United States
    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    Male-Only Voting Rights In The United States

    It did not put enough protection around the growth of the (related to kings, queens, emperors, etc.) (time when someone is president/being a president).…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics