Preview

Why Is Julius Caesar Not Perfect

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Julius Caesar Not Perfect
Shakespeare, who we know as one of the greatest play writers, has created plays that stand out but the one that seems to stand out the most is “Julius Caesar”. “Julius Caesar” takes place in the Roman ages when Rome was the most powerful empires in the world. Caesar, the leader of the Roman Empire, was at the prime of his ruling until a man named Cassius gathered a group of men. In that group it included Brutus who was one of Caesar’s main supporters. Cassius’s group got together and each stabbed Caesar. Shakespeare wrote this play because he wanted to show that anyone can turn against you and “stab” you in the back. Although you may be friends, you can’t always trust them; therefore, Shakespeare is showing us that humans are not perfect.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    JuliusCaesarEssayLogosPathosEthos
    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages

    JuliusCaesarEssayLogosPathosEthos

    William Shakespeare, a well known writer of plays, created several known plays such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet and Julius Caesar. In the tragic play of “Julius Caesar” , Julius Caesar was about to be crowned the King of Rome. However, Caesar’s conspirators, including his best friend Brutus, feared that Caesar would take advantage of his power and turn into a tyrant. Leading the conspirators to plan Caesar’s assassination before he was crowned king. Caesar was stabbed to death twenty-three times in the Roman Senate by the conspirators, including Brutus. Soon after, Caesar’s general and ally, Mark Antony, saw Caesar’s dead body and begged the conspirators to be able to die next to Caesar. Brutus denied his request. Antony shook Brutus’s hand with Caesar’s blood in order to join the conspirators and plan Caesar’s revenge. Both Brutus and Antony gave a speech in front of the plebeians of Rome in order to explain Caesar’s death. Both speeches impacted the audience of plebeians using logos, pathos, and ethos. However, between Brutus and Antony's speech, Antony gave a more effective speech because he proved that Caesar was not ambitious by rejecting the crown three times,had a greater emotional connection with his audience and he convinced the audience of plebeians that Brutus was no longer an honorable man.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis

    It portrays the 44 BC conspiracy against the Roman dictator Julius Caesar, his assassination and the defeat of the conspirators. Although the title of the play is Julius Caesar, Caesar is not the central character in its action; he appears in only three scenes, and is killed at the beginning of the third act. The protagonist of the play is Marcus Brutus, and the central psychological drama is his struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism, and friendship.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar Was A Good Ruler
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar Was A Good Ruler

    Ptolemy was a generous and a loving ruler. He was born on 62 BCE and he died 47 BCE. Ptolemy was married to Cleopatra VII, his older sister. He ruled during the Ptolemaic dynasty. During his ruling he went to war with Julius Caesar and his wife. He ruled over upper and lower egypt. He did not have any kids because he became pharaoh at age 9 and died at age 15 trying to flee the romans and drowned in the nile river.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tragic Heroes In Julius Caesar
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tragic Heroes In Julius Caesar

    There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad
    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved most of Caesar's qualities. He was a good and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a problem with Caesar and plotted to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil war between the Romans. This war may have been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had done things a little differently. Cassius would have made a better leader rather than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer like Caesar did.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Corrupt Nature Of Power In Julius Caesar
    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Corrupt Nature Of Power In Julius Caesar

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives
    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives

    Every text is constructed for a purpose; the composer is trying to convey and embed their agenda into the reader by persuading them to accept their perspective on key events, personalities and/or situations. Through the manipulation of various textual forms, structures and language composers persuade their audience to adopt their perspective. Composers often decide to present conflicting perspectives to truly engage their audience. By demonstrating the concept of conflicting perspectives the composer is able to glorify their perspective in contrast to another to enforce their agenda, they position the audience through language to side with them. The tight narrative “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare’s utilises the final days of Caesar’s…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Julius Caesar Bad
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Julius Caesar Bad

    Julius Caesar in the play "The tragedy of Julius Caesar" was a in line to be the next ruler of Ancient Rome. Caesar becomes drunk in power as most people would when there are roughly a million people adoring you. The people of Ancient Rome truly liked Caesar, in fact in Act 1 Scene 1, a commoner says "..we are taking holiday for Caesar's arrival.." In this act the reader gets a sense on how much the people like Caesar. However it is also shown to the reader how much noblemen do not like or trust Caesar to be a good leader. Throughout Act 1 and 2 Cassius is trying to convince Brutus, one of Caesar's good friends, to help them murder Caesar so he could take the crown. Brutus and his followers believe they are doing a service to the people. That in some way sacrificing Caesar is for the better good. However this being said Caesar's death was not a sacrifice it was a butchery, there is no need to go out and kill someone.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Power In Julius Caesar Essay
    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Power In Julius Caesar Essay

    Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives
    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    Traits that an individual personify do not make one to be perfect. Others can dream of such person, but everyone has flaws. Humans have flaws, as there is a need for heroes. An idealistic hero is best known as the Shakespearean tragic hero. A tragic hero has goals involving choices and be a man of great and admirable stature. During 44 BC, Julius Caesar ruled the Roman Republic into the powerful Roman Empire. Before Caesar’s rule, he left Rome for military services, and returned to rule Rome. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character Brutus is a tragic hero possessing the flaw of pride leading to his downfall.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws
    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    English - conflicting perspectives
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    English - conflicting perspectives

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Composition
    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar Composition

    Has someone close to you, a best friend, or a wingman ever betrayed you? That is what the play “Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare is all about. In the play Julius Caesar is the new ruler of Rome. Cassius, who is conspirator, does not want him to be ruler. So Cassius skillfully convinces Brutus that he would be a better ruler of Rome than Caesar. Cassius convinces Brutus by telling stories about Caesars personality flaws that make him a weak ruler and Brutus a better one.…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics