The fact that eugenics has historically been championed by privileged individuals to maintain their socio-economic dominance highlights the inherent bias within eugenics practices. This bias not only perpetuates existing inequalities, but also reinforces systemic barriers that prevent the underprivileged from accessing reproductive technologies. Thadani corroborates this assertion by highlighting the socioeconomic implications of designer baby technology, emphasizing how only affluent families can afford genetic alterations, thereby widening the gap between social classes. He then explains that this lack of accessibility will create a society divided between those who have had genetic modifications and those who have not (Thadani). By emphasizing that only affluent families can afford genetic alterations, Thadani calls attention to the widening gap between social classes perpetuated by such
The fact that eugenics has historically been championed by privileged individuals to maintain their socio-economic dominance highlights the inherent bias within eugenics practices. This bias not only perpetuates existing inequalities, but also reinforces systemic barriers that prevent the underprivileged from accessing reproductive technologies. Thadani corroborates this assertion by highlighting the socioeconomic implications of designer baby technology, emphasizing how only affluent families can afford genetic alterations, thereby widening the gap between social classes. He then explains that this lack of accessibility will create a society divided between those who have had genetic modifications and those who have not (Thadani). By emphasizing that only affluent families can afford genetic alterations, Thadani calls attention to the widening gap between social classes perpetuated by such