Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

Each year, more than 100 million animals die do to animal testing. (author, year) Every day in laboratories all over the United States animals are being tested on. The scientist use animals as test subjects because they believe it is the only way to test medications, soaps, and other products usually to meet for human uses. Animals are tested on to make sure products that humans use are safe but all products are not necessarily safe. After the animals are done being tested on they are put to death. In my opinion a Animal testing is wrong because we can now test products on alternative methods, animals make bad test subjects and do not ensure if a product is safe, and . Finally , animal testing in is is more expensive than alternative
These new methods include sophisticated tests using human cells and tissues. This method is called the vitro method. Harvard’s Wyss Institute has created “organs-on-chips” that contain human cells. The cells have been grown in a state of the art system that replicates the human organ system. The chips can be used instead of the animals while testing drugs and toxins. A variety of test using the the organ chips have ensure the safety of products for humans to use. Using these chips will allow us to test multiple products without the use of animals. Animal testing is not only cruel but sometimes the products tested on animals aren't safe for use on humans. Animals are used as “models” for researching human disease and as test subjects for humans too. The cellular, anatomical, and metabolic differences between humans and animals are very significant. This makes them bad test subjects. All the differences between humans and animals,the studying of disease on them can give us the wrong information. Making and developing cures for diseases can be wrong. Ninety percent of the drugs test on animals don't work for human