Preview

Why Hannibal Is To Blame

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
483 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Hannibal Is To Blame
I, Gaius Terentius Varro was made commander for this battle at Cannae and have failed miserably, us Romans entered the battle outnumbering Hannibal’s army and his allies, but left leaving many murdered Roman men behind on the battlefield including my colleague Lucius Aemilius Paullus. The Carthaginian general, Hannibal has completely annihilated us. He has outsmarted us Romans. But alas, this was not my fault, we were not meant to win, there were too many aspects of this battle that were not in our favor, things I could not have controlled. It started from the beginning, Hannibal arrived to Cannae before us, giving himself the upper hand to set up his army and take advantage of the Aufidus River which was the main source of water closest to …show more content…
Rome sent us into battle with about 80,000 men. Hannibal on the other hand, arrived at the battlefield with about 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry. Hannibal was very smart with how he planned out this battle. He managed to put us in a position where we were stuck, in a valley, with a river. We would not be able to escape, our mobility being restricted and especially because during the battle because Hannibal had his army lines facing north, while we faced the south and unfortunately in the valley, wind gusts blew our way resulting in dust and grit getting into many our men’s eyes. We went according to our usual formation, our light infantry toward the front, our heavy infantry behind the light infantry, and putting light and heavy cavalry on back wings. This formation failed us. Our usual tactic of placing a large amount of men on the field to overwhelm our enemy has failed as well. It is possible that Hannibal knew how we set up our battles and such, and he was able to devise a plan to outsmart us since this is the only way we were taught to set up and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hannibal was born in 247 B.C. and from an earlier age, he was taught by his father, who was also a Carthaginian general, to hate the Romans. Hannibal, at the age of 26, attacked Sagunto Spain with the army he was given. This was the invasion that started the second Punic War. Hannibal took an army of over 100,00 men with him and 37 elephants with him over the Pyrenees and Alps. This long journey covered over 1,000 miles. Hannibal…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman army before 264BC was a citizens’ army, comprised of farmers and the population, with very little to no full time soldiers. Every man was expected to provide his own gear, and as such it was very difficult to recruit the poor or slaves to fight, and when they were recruited, it was at the expense of the state. Another problem with a citizens’ army is that they are not full time soldiers, and many are often inexperienced in combat, and lacked the training necessary to be truly superior to any opponent.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire DBQ

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    To begin with, military weakness was a big factor in the fall of Rome. According to Document B, “...armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” This shows that the soldiers were very lethargic and couldn’t protect the empire effectively. They stopped doing their ground drills and never wore the breastplates. When war came to Rome they weren’t prepared to wear the armor, so instead they fought with…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eric merz

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome was affected negatively by the poor military strategy’s during its time in need. “Roman soldiers at the time did not wear breastplates and head armor, these soldiers often got shot down by archers” (doc B). I think the soldiers were lazy. They did not want to carry around all this heavy armor in the heat. Archers would always shoot down and defeat the Roman army. “The Huns exceeded any definition of savagery. They have compact sturdy limbs and think necks […]” (doc D). The Huns where the Romans enemy. They were savages and lived anywhere eating anything. The Romans stood no chance against this military brilliance. The Huns were ready to endure anything at the time, and the Roman soldiers were too lazy to wear armor.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The army had 125,000 soldiers, each highly trained in the advanced military tactics introduced by Julius Caesar. The barbarians could barely get through the shields of the army, that were locked together, to create almost a portable wall. Also, as the army were so powerful, they could be used to keep the citizens in line. As an intimidation factor, the army were strong, powerful and highly trained, so no citizens dared mess with them.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Tactics

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “All Gaul is divided into three parts, one of which the Belgae inhabit, the Aquitani another, those who in their own language are called Celts, in our Gauls, the third.” – Caesar. Taking place over a course of almost a decade, the Gallic Wars were fought throughout much of modern day Germany, France and Belgium. From 58 to 51 BC, Julius Caesar, the consul of Cisalpine Gaul, led his army in a series of campaigns demonstrating their formidable training and strategy as they attempted to conquer Gaul. Fighting against the native tribes, primarily the Belgae, the Aquitani and the Gauls, the Roman army was forced to utilize all of their discipline and technological skill as they fought the native tribes of Gaul. Caesar’s Gallic campaigns illustrate…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Attila and his troops were able to gather from 300,000-700,000 troops to join him at his side.[xviii] Their troops consisted of the Alans, the Burgundians, the Heruls, the Ostrogoths, the Riprarian Franks, the Sarmatians, the Suebi, and the Vandals. Unfortunately, the Romans created an alliance which was led by Flavius Aetius; these troops included the Celts, the Salian Franks and the Visigoths. This battle is known as the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains and is one of the most famous and decisive battles in all of world history. It all began on June 16, 452 on the plains between Troyes and Châlons and although it is memorable and important it was a very bloody and terrible battle where about 165,000 men are said to have died.[xix] “A small stream nearby filled with the blood of my brothers,” writes a soldier who survived.[xx] Attila was a very superstitious man and would not take any chances before each of his battles and decided to make sacrifices the morning before the battle. For this battle there was no exception. Attila understood that this would be a hard-fought battle and was not going to take any chances and let his opponents get the best of him and through is…

    • 3628 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This gave Rome the time to fortify what defences it had in the capital, making an irremovable stronghold for the Romans. This also allowed them to build new fortifications in the Alps and along the northern Italian frontier. This would prove problematic for Hannibal’s forces in their attempt to capture Rome and move through Italy swiftly. Though the ancients were not that good at siege operations, the equipment would have given Hannibal a shot at it. It would seem that the Carthaginian general needed the equipment if he was to stand a chance against the Roman defences, but alternatively, would have faced loosing his whole army in the Alps and Apennines if he had brought it.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romans underestimated the “danger, and the number of their enemies” they were in battles with, especially the Germanic tribes or the barbarians. The Barbarians were a warrior people and “pressed on the Roman empire with accumulated weight”; however, it was not because they were at war but for sport. Since fighting in the barbarian culture was something they did for fun, they would get in a lot of battles with the Romans to keep them entertained. This contributed to the fall of Rome because all the extensive military pressure from the barbarian would…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final question in need of asking is, was Hannibal ever close to completing his was Hannibal ever close to getting to Rome. The answer to that question is that Hannibal withdrew before he could attempt the final attack on Rome. As explained by Polybius,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal Because Hannibal was such a successful leader, his character was, and still is, debated over. By nature, the Romans, their allies, and even Hanno, a Carthaginian, disliked Hannibal because he brought fear and destruction to their peoples. On the other hand Carthage and its allies respected Hannibal because he brought expansion and wealth. Although both sides of the argument completely oppose each other, both have adequate reasoning.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the main reasons Rome fell was because of military weaknesses. The military was weak because of the army’s laziness. The excerpt from the ancient book ‘Concerning Military Matters’ by the historian Vegetius, states “Parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it...So our soldiers fought the Goths without any protection for chest ad head and were often beaten by archers.” Since the army was too weak to wear the armor,…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Gladiators

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome’s military might have been small but it was mighty, it had excellent military tactics and strong military generals. This contributes to why they kept on winning many battles. The fights that were won prisoners of war were taken. Many of the prisoners were then sold into the gladiatorial school and tried to earn their freedom, fighting in the gladiator games.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire Collaps

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the Roman Empire expanded, the ratio of land to officials became too great for the government to have enough control to keep everything how they wanted it to be. Soldiers/guards were stationed at the borders of the Empire, near the neighbouring Barbarian tribes. The guards paid the Barbarian chiefs if they agreed to become allies and help them out. By 300 AD the majority of the Roman army was comprised of barbarian trained soldiers who were much less effective than their superiors that Rome had in previous centuries, and had different beliefs and traditions to the Romans. Another problem was that many of the Roman citizens who were expected to enlist in the legions refused to do so and managed to find a way out of it. Some even forced their slaves to enlist, pretending to be them. As you can imagine, this made the new forces were very un-motivated, had low morale, didn't fight with courage and really, they couldn't care less about the development of Rome, after all they were only servants. Rome expanding wouldn’t benefit them in any way. These things put together made the battles against enemies very difficult for the Romans; Rome no longer had a firm grip or control over military situations. And due to this, over time the Empire became weaker, and easier to attack and bring down.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays