Horace Mann, the father of the common school movement developed a test to administer a group of students in 1800s. These tests made judgments about how students were doing at their current level and to see if they are ready to move up to a higher one. Testing during this era focused on memorization and oral tests such as oral spelling tests. The idea was to give each student equal opportunity in life. Students would have no distinction between the rich and the poor. Horace Mann believes in the equalization of all students and citizens through education. But with all his hard work he did not make much progress. Spring disputes, “In the simplest terms, the common school never became common to all students” (Spring, 87.) Common school ideologies argued that everyone would receive standardized equal …show more content…
The ETS created an increased importance of standardized testing in determining the status and income of Americans. In result of this new organization, the Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) is created. Standardized tests are used as an equalizer of opportunity. It is a tool of segregation that creates separate intelligence, socioeconomic status, wealth, and privilege. Spring argues, “Chauncey (President of ETS) hoped that the ETS would fulfill his dream by developing a series of multiple-choice mental tests that would determine everyone’s place in society. Though the ETS never developed a full range of mental tests to classify the American population, the SAT became a central gatekeeper for dividing the population by income and status” (Spring, pg 363.) TSAT tests are still administered for college entrance today. It is considered a step up from the IQ tests; they are supposed to only predict success rates in college. The ETS created a new idea of meritocracy based on testing. It was argued that the SAT continued to uphold the idea of everyone receiving an equal opportunity in college