Why Do We Need Police Brutality?
Police brutality is when an officer use of any force exceeding that reasonably necessary to accomplish its job. The police officers shouldn’t use so much force to the point of killing someone. When police brutality does happen the officers should be fully punished.
We are more now more aware of police brutality then back then since police brutality has always being happening. According to the police brutality infographic “Rapid growth in a video- enabled smartphones is largely responsible for the increase of police brutality, with more than 60% of Americans are now carrying a video enabled mobile devices”. Saying that we are now we are more aware of such a brutal crimes because we have a visual evidence of what is going.
In the article “why …show more content…
One officer says “feel that the only way a criminal would receive any punishment was to punish the individual him/herself” So he is telling us that any “criminal” should receive any kind of an abuse to be punish. I doesn’t matter who it is that is being arrested police have the right to any kind an abuse to do such anything to be punished. That is incorrect why would a police treat anybody in a way to harm when not needed. It’s a shame to see what police have done to innocent citizens. In the article “Why Are police so violent?” states the way police use “Broken windows” style of policing in which officers crack down aggressively on minor infractions”. Force shouldn’t be needed for minor infractions it’s a simple thing is just to arrest someone without causing any harm. In the “Police Brutality Infographic” shows us what police say towards police brutality “always following the rules is not compatible with getting the job done”. Why is it possible for this to be say by an officer who has to protect from bad when they’re the ones doing the opposite? In the article in “Truth of Consequence” “Police come up with the same narrative: I felt threatened, I felt afraid, the victim struggled with me, and he reached for my gun.” Which the jury would have never question because there is no such thing as evidence. That’s why is important for us to have set mind
We are more now more aware of police brutality then back then since police brutality has always being happening. According to the police brutality infographic “Rapid growth in a video- enabled smartphones is largely responsible for the increase of police brutality, with more than 60% of Americans are now carrying a video enabled mobile devices”. Saying that we are now we are more aware of such a brutal crimes because we have a visual evidence of what is going.
In the article “why …show more content…
One officer says “feel that the only way a criminal would receive any punishment was to punish the individual him/herself” So he is telling us that any “criminal” should receive any kind of an abuse to be punish. I doesn’t matter who it is that is being arrested police have the right to any kind an abuse to do such anything to be punished. That is incorrect why would a police treat anybody in a way to harm when not needed. It’s a shame to see what police have done to innocent citizens. In the article “Why Are police so violent?” states the way police use “Broken windows” style of policing in which officers crack down aggressively on minor infractions”. Force shouldn’t be needed for minor infractions it’s a simple thing is just to arrest someone without causing any harm. In the “Police Brutality Infographic” shows us what police say towards police brutality “always following the rules is not compatible with getting the job done”. Why is it possible for this to be say by an officer who has to protect from bad when they’re the ones doing the opposite? In the article in “Truth of Consequence” “Police come up with the same narrative: I felt threatened, I felt afraid, the victim struggled with me, and he reached for my gun.” Which the jury would have never question because there is no such thing as evidence. That’s why is important for us to have set mind