Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Why Did Revolution Break Out In February 1917

Satisfactory Essays
900 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Revolution Break Out In February 1917
Why Did Revolution Break Out In February 1917?

One of the reasons for the 1917 February Revolution was military defeats. In 1914, when Germany was fighting France and Britain in the first world war, the Russians invaded Eastern Germany with two large armies. However the Germans defeated them at the battles of Tannenburg and Masurian Lakes. Also in 1915, Germany turned completely against Russia and launched a series of offensives against the Russian army. By the end of 1915, the Russian forces had been completely driven out of Russian Poland. The Russians were beaten and large areas of Russian territory were overrun. In 1916, the Russians won against the Austrians and regained some territory but the German army attacked Russia in support of their Austrian ally and defeated Russia again. The effort and cost of the war meant terrible suffering for soldiers and civilians. Almost two million soldiers and civilians were killed. At this point during the war, the civilians and soldiers were looking for someone to blame, thus leading to the loss of faith in the Tsar as a leader. Without a trustworthy leader, the people of Russia started to riot and protest more, which eventually led to the outbreak of revolution.

Another reason for the outbreak of the February Revolution in 1917 was the leadership. In 1915, Tsar Nicholas II took personal control of the army. This was a bad decision because the Tsar knew little about the command and organisation of large military forces, thus leading to more defeats. Also, when the Tsar left, he left the Tsarina – Alexandra – and Rasputin in charge. Between 1915 and 1916, the Tsarina made constant ministerial changes and decisions that were influenced by Rasputin. This caused problems in Russia because Alexandra was a German, therefore the peasants and middle class people of Russia suspected her of being a German spy, deeming her untrustworthy. The organisation of the Russian army deteriorated and there were massive shortages of ammunitions, equipment, and medical supplies. Nicholas' decision to take personal charge meant that he was increasingly seen by the Russian people as having personal responsibility for the military disasters inflicted on Russia.

Furthermore, another cause for the outbreak of revolution in February 1917 was Russia's economic problems that were growing steadily worse. By the beginning of 1917, Russia was facing economic collapse. This was because the Russian industry moved into crisis during the war. Raw materials from overseas could no longer reach Russia. The shortages of raw materials and finished goods grew worse. This meant that the army faced major shortages of supplies and weapons. There were also problems with agriculture. Millions of peasant farmers were conscripted into the army thus leading to a very serious shortage of manpower on farms and fall in production. By 1916 there serious food shortages in the city shops and the price of basic foods was rapidly increasing. This eventually led to inflation, meaning that the value of rouble (the basic monetary unit of Russia) had fallen which led to soaring prices. This made it increasingly difficult for the peasants/poorer people to buy food. Transport also added to this problem. The undeveloped Russian railway system now had to cope with the pressures of moving large quantities of troops and supplies to the battlefronts, therefore making it more difficult to keep the cities supplied with food. With all of the food shortages and the lack of supplies for Russia, people (women especially for them and their children) started to protest and riot, demanding more food. This gradually led up to the outbreak of the February revolution.

Additionally, another reason for the outbreak of the revolution was that in February 1917 rioting began in the capital city of Petrograd (St. Petersburg) as crowds attacked bakeries in the desperate search for bread. In the following days, strikes and demonstrations took places and even some soldiers began to join in the protests. When Nicholas II was informed of these events, he dismissed it as a “hooligan movement” which would soon be over. This showed that the Tsar was still unable to be an authoritative figure. In his own capital city, an independent soviet of workers and soldiers was formed that rebelliously refused to acknowledge the authority of the Tsar. Nicholas made an attempt to return from the war front to the capital and reclaim his authority but this was met with total failure. Isolated and powerless without the support of his army, his reign as Tsar was over, thus leading to his abdication.

The social, economic and political impacts of the revolution left Russia without a leader and with many shortages of important supplies such as food. Therefore living conditions in Russia at this time were very difficult for most people. These difficulties led to a series of strikes, mutinies, demonstrations and riots throughout Russia.

Of all of these reasons for the outbreak of the 1917 February Revolution, the most important one is Russia's economic problems and the lack of an authoritative figure. This is because the lack of good transport and industry meant that there was a very short supply of food and ammunition that was needed. The inflation and lack of agricultural workers enhanced these bad living conditions. Without an authoritative figure making decisions that are both reasonable and beneficial for the people of Russia, these economic problems are thus made more serious and vital for living conditions in Russia.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1905, Nicholas made himself Commander of the Russian Military and left Petrograd for his new military headquarters on the war front. Because he had left, the Tsarina Alexandra was left to rule. Her most trusted advisor was a faith healer called Grigori Rasputin. Because of him, Alexandra became very paranoid and appointed and dismissed government officials at her own personal choice. Russia had 4 different Prime Ministers who were appointed in 16 months and their policies all varied from repressive to oppressive. Rasputin was murdered in 1916 by some of his opponents, and Alexandra who was left alone to rule tightened her grip on authority over the Russian people.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By 1917, the Russian economy was in poor shape and near complete destruction because of the war effort. Food shortages were rampant which brought about civil unrest.…

    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The immense cost of the war led to dramatic price inflation in Russia; by the end of 1916 were four times those of 1914. Wages rose more slowly than prices, and this lag contributed to the revival of strikes in the capital at the end of 1916. Food supply was an additional problem, which led to an outbreak out of rioting and strikes in Petrograd and spread to other parts of Russia. This caused the first revolution of 1917, where on March 15th the Tsar was forced to abdicate from power and authority passed to a provisional government, made up of members of the Duma.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nicholas’ autocratic method of ruling blinded him from the growing needs of Russia, and enforced a level of oppression which only heightened the discontent which led to the March Revolution in 1917. The diplomatic and military failures at war highlighted and showcased these flaws in Nicholas’s autocracy. If Nicholas had been more willing and able to adapt and reform, he could have ensured a gradual transition from an autocratic nation to a constitutional democratic nation, where the Romanov dynasty still existed to this…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1917 most Russians had lost faith in the leadership of Tsar Nicholas II. The first part of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was Russia's terrible involvement in World War I (1914-1918). Militarily, imperial Russia was no match for industrialized Germany, and the Russian death toll was greater than those sustained by any nation in any previous war. ("History.com"). The February Revolution started March 8, 1917 when rioters rioted for bread took to the streets in the Russian capital of Saint Petersburg. Troops were sent to Saint Petersburg to stop the riots; they opened fire and killed the people. In response to the way the riots were being handled Tsar Nicholas II gave up the throne on March 15. The October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution was led by Vladimir Lenin who launched a nearly bloodless battle against the ad hoc government ("History."). The Bolsheviks and their allies occupied government buildings and other strategic locations in Saint Petersburg, and soon formed a new government with Lenin as its head; he became the virtual dictator of the first Marxist state in the world.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II responsible for the outbreak of the Russian Revolution in 1917…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the factors mentioned above were reason for the revolt that took place at the end of February in 1917, however, many of the factors were similar to the conditions and causes of the revolt in 1905 which raises the question: why was the revolution of 1917 successful? One reason is that WWI worked as a catalyst, which facilitated the success of the revolution by assisting each factor in aligning at the same time and place. WWI was not the only catalyst as the idea of liberal and free conscience was the second key which shaped the success of this particular revolt. The police, distraught and overcome with grief and guilt for their actions the day before when they were ordered to fire on innocent, peaceful masses, turned their weapons over and joined forces with the rebel forces. This forced Nicholas to call to the front to send back patriot soldiers in order to help stabilize the home front, who had not idea what was happening at home but it was too…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soon after becoming Tsar he would ask Alix for support instead of trusting the “bureaucrats and sycophants” (Atchison). Nicholis would shy away and find himself lonely throughout his reign (Atchison). Nicholas II knew that his time as Tsar would be short lived and his people had grown tired and angry with him. He believed the only reason Russia was still holding “at the seams” was because of the monarchy (Atchison). This led to the Revolution in February of 1917 which was an “uproar” (Biography).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the breakdown of social order was instigated by the leadership of Nicholas II. The Tsars’ archaic policy’s led to the persecution of racial minorities and oppression of the working class, which held Russia’s population majority and contributed to over half the nations’ income. Nicolas II was very easily influenced, which led to him being easily persuaded by his advisors and wife. His wife, Tsarina Alexander was a very strong believer of the autocratic system and believed that power should not be shared. The Tsarina was very politically strong-minded, however she was ill-informed. The Tsar often relied on his advisors to help make decisions, as he himself had not been exposed to the harsh reality of life in Russia. His lack of determination and his political naiveté led him into his decision to be the front command for the Russian troops in WWI, which would eventually prove fatal, as behind him, he left his ill-equip wife to lead with the highly influential Rasputin with her. The support from Nobles and army generals began to diminish, as they saw…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war temporarily brought an end to the industrial unrest in Russia that started in 1904. However, later it returned. The war also brought Nicholas II political benefits. Russia stood behind him. Well, they stood behind him until things got increasingly difficult and downright unpleasant. The war was not going the direction that Nicholas II had expected. In 1915, Nicholas II was so dissatisfied with the Army’s conduct of war, that…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In World War I, Rasputin’s influence over Russian politics was demonstrated with his ability to appoint his friends to high government positions regardless of their incompetence. When Tsar Nicholas II left for the front line in 1915, Tsarina Alexandra took responsibility for domestic affairs with Rasputin as her advisor. Rasputin saw this as an opportunity to control and destabilise government by replacing senior ministers with his benefactors, whom he could manipulate.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays