Preview

Why Did Britain Justified The Expulsion Of The Acadians?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Britain Justified The Expulsion Of The Acadians?
On, the 11th of April of 1713 through a series of agreements Britain and France concluded the War of Spanish Succession by signing the Treaty of Utrecht. Amongst many of the agreements in the treaty, France seceded the territory where Acadia, present day Nova Scotia, to the British. Following the acquirement of Acadia, Britain had to decide the course of action it wanted to take in regards to the Acadians. Would they allow them to continue with their day to day lives? Did they pose a threat? The British attempted to get the Acadians to sign on oath of allegiance to the British Crown. However, when the Acadians refused to sign the oath. Consequently, the British responded with the deportation of a large number of Acadians. From 1755 to 1762 approximately 12,000 Acadians from were removed from their homes. The British justified the expulsion of the Acadians because of their disloyalty. This paper will argue, however, that the expulsion was less of a response to disloyalty and more of a means for Britain to assert their dominance in the BNA.
Amongst many of the possible reasons why the British decided to expel the Acadians from Nova Scotia, previous, and ongoing, tensions between France and England came into play. It is important to take into account the international conflict in which both
…show more content…
Such measures were taken due to the fear of an unstable state. It was believed that the presence of different religious/social groups within a territory could pose a threat to the stability of for the state. In his paper A.J.B. Johnson explains how governments saw other religious groups in their territory as unstable. This concept, however, with the encounter of the Acadians and the British. Events such like this one had been occuring in Europe since the 16th and 17th century. For

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ch 24 Study Guide Copy

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    10. What caused the disintegration of the Dutch overseas empire and what lands did the British gain as a result? p.641…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An account of a voyage and of an arrival of four Mississippi Savages to France was translated by Mercure de France. This account, written by Ellis and Steen is significant because of the profound circumstances in which France and the rest of Europe were in during this time period. France’s strategy towards the Natives in North America, were much different from the strategies Spain and the English were employing. The French wanted to bring these Natives to their land to amaze them with beauty and to proclaim the power and greatness of their king.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. After defeating the French in North America in 1763, the British faced the related problems of continued westward expansion by its settlers and paying for governing the colonies (taxation). What did the British government do in response to these problems and how did they contribute to colonists’ resentment of the British government and eventual…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The era of late 1700’s was a period of great change in North America. After the French and Indian war ended in 1963, Great Britain’s control of North America’s east coast caused more interaction between the American colonies and Canada, which was a French colony prior to the war. In 1774, the Continental Congress wrote to the inhabitants of Quebec in an appeal which was entitled, “Appeal to the Inhabitants of Quebec.” In this appeal, the American colonists expressed their great joy that Quebec was now a part of the English colonies, and the main thesis of this appeal was that the inhabitants of Quebec had earned the right to have the same rights as the colonies under a just form of government, and that the best way for them to achieve that was by joining the American colonies. These ideas that the colonists had were very persuasive, and they provided a…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Britain had to do this to help loyal Canada on the northern frontiers and unite the Indians against Americans. The American authority also did not take any drastic action against British presence at the beginning because they better realized that if England had not been war-weary, she might have crushed the colonial armies. According to Vergennes, the French minister, ‘ . . You will notice that the English buy the peace more than they make it. Their concessions, in fact, as much as to the boundaries as to the fisheries and loyalists, exceed all that I should have thought possible.’ However, it was neither England’s unexpected generosity nor Shelburne’s foolishly ‘the dishonorable surrender’ as his critiques claimed. In fact, Shelburne wanted to shake off ‘the white men’s burden’ and desired to establish profitable commercial relationship and keep the United States away from French post-war influence as well as to avert future friction with the United States. What Shelburne aimed was to win over his three European foes i.e. France, Spain and Netherlands by reducing America from the ranks of enemy. Thus, he tried to lure Americans into a loose tie with the British Empire. This trend of Anglo-American relationship developed afterwards and stretched to the present though some bitter incidents occurred between…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Red King's Rebellion fought more than three hundred years ago between the Algonquian peoples and New England settlers was in per-capita terms the bloodiest war in our nation's history. Before the conflict ended, over 9,000 people were dead (two-thirds of them Native Americans), and homelessness, starvation, and economic hardship plagued the descendants of both races for generations to come. In this fascinating book, Russell Bourne examines the epic struggle from both sides, seeking to explain how the biracial harmony that once reigned--when the Plymouth Colony's neighboring Wampanoag’s, under the stately Massasoit (King…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ninth important topic is the resettlement of the African American Loyalists. In 1783 after England and the United States signed the Treaty of Paris, Britain was faced with resettling the former slaves who sided with them in the war. They did not want to return them to their former owners nor did they want to keep them fearing they would be more of a liability than an asset. They were sent to Nova Scotia in Canada. This is important because although the Britain no longer wanted the African American’s they did not want to return them…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Why did the Puritans leave England? A. ? They wanted more money B. :-)…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is important to point out that English settlers were a definite majority of those in North America during the entire eighteenth century. However, the proportion declined from about twenty to one in 1700 to only about three to one by 1775. So a good essay should point out that the significance of non-English groups was increasing. The next task is to select three groups from the list and describe the influence of each. Of the non-English settlers, the largest group consisted of Africans, most of whom were enslaved and forced to immigrate. The…

    • 11070 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Wampanoags and the English were allies prior to King Philip’s War (Hewitt and Lawson, 53). In fact, the Wampanoags helped the pilgrims colonize Plymouth, Massachusetts. Over time, English settlements encroached on Indian land. This eventually became the primary cause of the Wampanoag’s rebellion. The Grand Sachem of the Wampanoag Confederacy was Metacom and he did not trust the colonists because he felt that they were at fault for his father’s and brother’s deaths. He was also upset because the colonists charged and killed people of his tribe under their judicial system (Hewitt and Lawson, 58). When John Sassato, a Christian Indian messenger, was murdered, three Wampanoag indians were sentenced to execution by the Plymouth Colony jury. Metacom and his tribe were outraged at their mistreatment by the colonists. Disease was another factor that caused Indian resentment because they were not immune to various deadly diseases that were introduced by the settlers. The Wampanoags were unhappy for various other reasons as well, such as because the English intruded on their hunting grounds, herded cattle on their lands, destroyed their crops, and many indians were used as slaves. Another reason the indians complained about the settlers was because the settlers tried to convert them to Christianity (Hewitt and Lawson, 60).…

    • 297 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The years of the early eighteenth century were a period of “salutary neglect.” This was a time of peace or was actually a period of time-out in which both England and France used in the years until 1739 to strengthen their war-making capacity. Though this was known as a period of “salutary neglect”, in reality it was an era when King and Parliament increased their control over colonial…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1763 marked the end of French and Indian war and caused a great celebration and pride in the American colonies. But, in next twelve years, the same pride was altered by at bitter and violent conflict with the mother country. The injustices of the mother country finally led the American colonists to declare independence and wage war against it. American colonies were justified for waging war and breaking away from Britain because they were defending themselves against a series of measures Parliament wished to impose on their communities without their consent.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foreign support was vital to the Jacobites in both the rebellions of 1715 and 1745-46. Many British Jacobites based their participation in the rebellions on the arrival of foreign assistance. The French support for the rebellion of 1715 was hampered by the death of Louis XIV in 1714. The Duke of Orleans succeeded Louis XIV and with the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht still standing and his own designs on becoming heir-apparent the Duke needed peace and an understanding with Britain.1 France, in both the ‘15 and the ‘45 was always faced with more demands on its strengths than it could possibly meet. Only if the French strategists could see the exiled house of Stuart as a priority would support be forthcoming. James ordered his followers and sympathizers to do all they could to involve France and England, hoping for an intervention.2 The Spanish participated and aided the Jacobites during the latter stages of the 1715 rising. In late December a shipment of £15,000 of Spanish gold was despatched, but with luck not on the rebels side it was wrecked on the beach at St Andrews Bay.3 Similarly in the 1745-46 rising the French ship “Le Prince Charles” carrying funds was intercepted by the Royal Navy forcing Charles Edward into an early and fateful battle in April 1746.4 The lack of financial aid sounded the death knell to both rebellions. In the ‘45 it is thought that Louis XV had left his decision to commit himself to the cause far too late, holding back to find out how serious the rebellion in Scotland was.5 This unfortunate lack of foreign assistance was a key factor in the failure of the rebellions.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the British defeated the French, the British claimed control over all of the French owned land in North America. When that happened the British troops occupied previously owned French forts in Ohio country and the Great Lakes region. When the French became alliances with some of the Native American tribes British policies soured everything from then on.…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I was a Acadian back in the 1755’s to the 1763’s I would take the oath of allegiance. My first, reason of why I would take the oath of allegiance is that if I didn’t take the oath I would be tortured and even be killed. By that I mean if didn’t take the oath of allegiance I would be tortured like would not get food or water and then eventually would be killed by the British. Also instead of being tortured in such bad ways I rather take the oath. Even though that isn’t fair because everybody's rights should matter. My second, reason of why I should take the oath of allegiance is that if I didn’t my house, land and everything else that belonged to me would have been set on fire. The reason behind the British doing this would be so I wouldn’t…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays