Like every biography, it has to show a story that benefits the person being written on, how they progressed through struggles, followed their own ideas, and won out in the end long after their death, but Gaustad did more than that. Gaustad was not afraid, early on, to show how Williams's ignorance and stubbornness caused him the exile. He was not afraid to show that Williams did in fact say he could be wrong on some of his accounts, that he wasn't perfect. Gaustad wrote on how Williams's feelings toward the government were sometimes flawed, that the government and church could not just be separated immediately like Williams pushed for, but that over time it could be
Like every biography, it has to show a story that benefits the person being written on, how they progressed through struggles, followed their own ideas, and won out in the end long after their death, but Gaustad did more than that. Gaustad was not afraid, early on, to show how Williams's ignorance and stubbornness caused him the exile. He was not afraid to show that Williams did in fact say he could be wrong on some of his accounts, that he wasn't perfect. Gaustad wrote on how Williams's feelings toward the government were sometimes flawed, that the government and church could not just be separated immediately like Williams pushed for, but that over time it could be