The problem was without reliable ships to navigate the ocean; it was more trouble than it was worth for most nations to send their navies out into the blue. However, with the reformations of ships’ speed, ability to navigate, and increased durability, nations began using the oceans for commerce and exploration. Now, all nations had their eyes fixed on controlling the sea. Almost instantly, there was growing government interest in control of specific sites and control of violence at sea along with the use of privately owned ships for acts of war. When nations came into contests to control the sea, it led to war on the water. Though, the Renaissance was a period of great success for Europeans at sea around the world, it was a time of warfare at sea as well. Naval escapades during the sixteenth century were the catalyst of naval warfare of the future. As the Renaissance progressed nations moved towards nation-run navies. Naval warfare was slower to take off compared to land …show more content…
Turning gunpowder into artillery or into firearms was an expensive hobby. Those who could not create gunpowder for themselves were forced to purchase some form of it or risk falling behind the military world. Once inventors were able to produce extensive uses for gunpowder, powerful nations and emperors began paying for vast amounts of cannon fire, gunpowder, muskets, bayonets, and all the means to maintain and repair these assets. Being that the rich employed the inventors, the rich took credit for the inventions! This meant that if someone wanted to buy the new musket, they had to buy it from the nation or emperor, not the inventor! With the growing advantage gunpowder gave the rich, other nations committed large amounts of cash to firearms. This created a cycle, in which the stronger nations would supply themselves, off of the money of the poorer nations, who were barley able to keep up. Central governments of large states could afford artillery trains and large armies. The artillery trains counter-acted centrifugal forces and enabled the central governments to increase their control over outlying areas of their realms, or to expand at the expense of their weaker neighbors. This increased their tax revenues, enabling them to support bigger artillery trains and armies, enabling them to increase their centralization of control and their tax revenues still further, and so on. The inability of the