Preview

What Is Unjustified Morality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Unjustified Morality
There are two types of morality, justified and unjustified. Justified morality can usually stand on its own. It does not require intense reasoning because it is common sense. For example, “Do not kill” and “Do not steal” are justified moral commands because if you kill or steal, you are bringing evil upon someone else and that is immoral. Unjustified morals are harder to find reason for because they are “unjustifiable” in nature. An example of an unjustifiable moral is “Do not have sexual relations out of wedlock.” For this example, and for many other instances of unjustified morality, it is difficult to explain why doing the act is immoral. It becomes difficult to answer the question “Why shouldn’t I do this in order to remain moral?” Or, …show more content…
One could answer the question posed by saying, “It is immoral to have sex out of wedlock because God commanded us not to, and He knows all that you do; and for committing that act, He will smite you!” Or at least that reasoning would suffice the curiosity of the selfish person. They still will not understand the intrinsic harm of the action (because there is none), but their self-interest (fear of God’s wrath) will keep them from committing this ‘immoral’ act. For the less selfish person, one could ‘justify’ the immorality of the act by saying, “This act is a sin against God; it hurts him.” This type of reasoning appeals to the less-selfish person, provided that he or she has love for God. Whether you are reasoning with a selfish or un-selfish person, the use of God and Religion to ‘justify’ these issues is only pertinent when dealing with a God-fearing, moral being. A person who does not believe in God still will not see any harm in committing these ‘immoral’ acts because the religious reasoning behind them does not apply to him/her. The rational, atheistic being will see the reasons justifying the immorality of the action as irrational, whereas the rational, religious being sees those reasons as rational because they are relevant to his/her values and beliefs. Therefore Religion assists in ‘justifying’ the unjustified morals to religious people, but has no use to non-religious moral

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Phil 1600 Ch 3 Questions

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This means that if one doesn’t obey the authority he will get punished. So moral decisions are made to avoid punishment.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated in the Divine Command Theory (DCT) of Moral Wrongness, an act is wrong if and only if it violates a command of God. However, there are many oppositions to this theory, the most famous being the Euthyphro problem. The Euthyphro problem is known as a dilemma argument, meaning the structure is set up as follows; either God’s commands are arbitrary or God’s commands are based simply on his knowledge of right and wrong. This dilemma argument is formulated in such a way that if you believe either statement and its following conclusion to be true, the DCT is then inherently false. For example, if the former is true, then God has no moral authority and if the latter is true, morality is independent of God, both cases dispelling the theory.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of this dilemma, philosophers have tried to create a secular ethic in order to avoid it. But, according to Kai Nielsen, “Religious morality… may have its difficulties, but secular morality, religious apologists argue, has still greater difficulties.” He then explains that without some great consequence, or without any bigger purpose for living morally, then there would be no reason to live morally, or to even define what morality consists…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality, according to Merriam-Webster, is, “beliefs about what is right behavior and what is wrong behavior.” When showing civil disobedience, one may use morality to justify why whatever is done, happens. King uses morality to justify his being thrown in jail by telling his clergymen that it is because he was protesting the unfair treatment of African Americans not just in Birmingham, but all over the nation. Thoreau uses morality in his civil disobedience by saying it was done out of his morals of believing that the poll tax for war was wrong. Both of these authors were okay with the fact that the outcome might not be what they wanted, but they were not doing anything…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is a belief or set of beliefs about what it right behavior and what is wrong behavior. What is acceptable by society, and the degree of ‘rightness’ and ‘wrongness’, varies among different individuals.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People are extremely motivated by self-interest, even as societies have evolved and grown larger. While the more intertwined societies did lead to a greater need for cooperation in order to live as peacefully as possible, the need to follow the rules of that society can still be ignored when self-interests are present. The need to live by a set of moral rules is well explained by connecting God and morality. As God holds a person accountable, following the moral rules is now is that person’s interest. So even while the person may act according to society, the actions are still explained by the incentives and sanctions placed by God with the promise of Heaven and the threat of Hell, respectively. However, the Divine Command Theory falls short by basing morality solely on God’s commands. Morality then seems subject to God’s whims, which makes morality arbitrary. The opposing view counters strongly with the existence of morals within atheists. For if morals are based only on God’s will, then atheists must be godless brutes lacking any semblance to a moral compass. The morality of atheists is clearly evident, yet the argument failed to establish a reason for morals other acknowledging damage done to the…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, plenty of people who don't believe in God still make judgments of right and wrong, and think no one should kill another for his wallet even if he can be sure to get away with it. Second, if God exists, and forbids what's wrong, that still isn't what makes it wrong. Murder is wrong in itself, and that's why God forbids it (if He does.) God couldn't make just any old thing wrong-like putting on your left sock before you’re right-simply by prohibiting it. If God would punish you for doing that it would be inadvisable to do it, but it wouldn't be wrong. Third, fear of punishment and hope of reward, and even love of God, seem not to be the right motives for morality. If you think it's wrong to kill, cheat, or steal, you should want to avoid doing such things because they are bad things to do to the victims, not just because you fear the consequences for yourself, or because you don't want to offend your Creator.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apol 104 Worldview

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Question of Morality is, what is right or wrong based upon God’s scripture in the biblical worldview? Psalm 4, tells us “lift up the light of your countenance upon us, Lord” implying that what is good and bad will be impressed upon us. Genesis 3, shares with us Adam’s poor moral behavior of eating the forbidden fruit.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Euthyphro Dilemma

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Religion and morality have been seen as inseparable since the advent of Western thought (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-morality/) - religion's fundamental characters being frequently ethical in nature, and morality often viewed as a derivative of religion. However, the relationship is not as clear cut as many people would like you to believe. A very old and important dilemma facing this relationship is the Euthyphro dilemma, discussed in Plato’s Euthyphro. In it, Socrates and Euthyphro argue about the nature of morality outside of a court. Socrates is being prosecuted for impiety, while Euthyphro is charging his father with murder. Although charging your father, even for murder, is frowned upon in Ancient Greek culture, Euthyphro justifies it by claiming that this is similar to what the Gods have been reported to have done, and therefore it is alright. After multiple definitions of holiness and piety, Socrates brings up the Euthyphro dilemma , which when adapted to a monotheistic context where God is an all-powerful, all-knowing being (which I will be using), goes:…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is defined as the ability to know right from wrong, and good from bad in our society today and also the societies of the past. Morality is influenced by your family, your religion, and your society. We will be looking at Asia, Africa and the Americas and how their morality was affected by family, religion, and the society.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the distinction between a just law and an unjust law? To me the answer is evident, and I have a hard time believing that anyone couldn’t easily know the distinction or disagree with the distinction that Martin Luther King Jr. makes during his “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” That “a just law is a man-made code that’s squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law” (533). At its very basic definition, just laws protect the people and unjust laws hurt the people.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immorality In The Crucible

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Immorality exists everywhere, but distinguishing between morality and immorality causes problems. As one mistakes very dark gray as black, well disguised immorality can appear like morality. Some people know that something is immoral and these people will typically either continue to do it or refuse to participate. On the contrary, many other people will not know and will either get pulled onto the stronger side or try to stay neutral. Overall, immorality causes a society to collapse, either because it divides the people or unites them under the immorality. A divided society will collapse because of disputes and the people will not work together to keep the society how it needs to be, but a society that unites on…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you sin, there are consequences for immoral actions. Sin is a corruption, a pollution, a rotting of the soul. There is no debate if something is wrong or not; if it’s wrong, it’s absolutely wrong. Lying is never okay in any situation because lying is a sin, and sin causes corruption. There are no “little” sins, no “worse” sins, no “minor” sins; all sin is equally disgusting, repulsive, and destructive to a person’s soul. In this way, my viewed differ from utilitarianism. This view does have the sense of “do what makes you or the most people happy”, whereas my beliefs are “do what makes God happy”. God is not necessarily a popular topic in today’s society and obeying Him often leads to ridicule and persecution, even among my so called “friends”, so this belief of mine does not make those around me happy, but if my actions make God happy, that’s all I care about. Also, this theory does not take into account “individual integrity and personal rights” (DeLeece, Retrieved 2017), whereas Christianity does respect the rights of others. You have free will. You have the right to sin and do the wrong thing if you want to, but there will be consequences. You have the right to deny God if you want to, but there will be consequences. And, as utilitarianism would consider “executing an innocent person” in order to bring happiness to the greatest number of people, Christianity would never punish someone for a crime they didn’t commit nor consider the happiness of the crowd more important than what’s…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Divine Command Theory of ethics, morality comes directly from the word of God- in other words, all that God commands is moral and all that He prohibits is immoral. Although upon first glance this is a conveniently absolute code to adhere to, a number of flaws and fundamental logical fallacies in the argument for DCT render God’s word insufficient as a means to determine right and wrong.…

    • 919 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deciding if an action is moral can vary greatly depending on which theory is applied in order to make a decision. A Divine Command Theorist would evaluate morality by consulting religious or sacred texts and by possibility consulting a religious authority on said texts. Through this approach the Divine Command Theorist would be looking for guidance from the “word of God” on the matter. A Natural Law Theorist on the other hand would attempt to decide if an action is moral by deciding the action's purpose and how it fits with the natural working order of the world, this idea is often coupled with the influence of religion as it's ideas are incorporated into many religions like Christianity. They would try through their version of science to…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics